CHAPTER IV Presentation of Data, Software Merchandise Analysis and Implementation The Existing System Leader 0 Manual Process Supervisor Day of ExamSchedule Time Term Rooms Teachers Themes Sections Number 4. 1 Process of the Manual Scheduling The figure shows the existing system of NODRIZA Computer School Lipa. The administrator will gather the information needed for the manual means of Scheduling.
Following gathering your data the officer will physically do the routine. The Proposed System 0 Computerized Arranging Dean Administrator File MaintenanceSchedule Schedule Supervision Figure some. Process of the Proposed System The number shows this article of the proposed system. As soon as the user entered to the program, the system is able to accommodate the File Routine service, Schedule Administration, Schedule Browser and Studies. Prospective Customer The Manager will become the primary end user of the proposed system. The main user features access to every one of the features of the system which includes file maintenance, plan managing, plan browsing and generating reports. The primary end user can add, edit, update and delete distinct transactions of all the features stated previously.
The user as well allows to print each of the reports that was manufactured by the system. Aspects of the Suggested System In Software Product Analysis in Chapter III, the proponents discussed the several possible application that can be used for making the suggested study. Of most those application, the proponents decided to chose the SQL server 2008 for database, and Visual Standard. Net june 2006 as the programming dialect. The proponents prefer to use the SQL Machine 2008 more than other sources it provides much faster Full-Text Search capability and much faster control once SQL Server 2008 features are being used.
In addition , SQL Server 08 provides for better storage of information and crawls including strained indexes, large tables, rare columns, and page level compression. Regarding programming terminology use, the proponents employed Visual Simple. Net 2005 because the Visual Basic. Net is one of the many popular dialects used in the application development market. VB. Net provides maintained code performance that operates under the Common Language Runtime (CLR), causing robust, steady and safeguarded applications. VB. NET is definitely free threading against the
VB single-threaded flat feature. All features of the. NET framework are readily available in VB. NET. VB. NET is totally object oriented. This is a major addition that VB6 and other previous releases did not have. Protection has become better quality in VB. NET. Program Design DFD (Data Flow Diagram) can be used by the proponents to show the graphical portrayal of the movement of data through the system. Also this is used in visualizing of data processing. The framework is the summary of DFD of the existing and recommended Data Flow Diagram (DFD).
This is the widely used system building tools, especially for the functional system in where the features are vital important and even more complex compared to the data that system manipulates. The framework is the synopsis of the Info Flow Diagram (DFD) of proposed system. The DFD (Data Circulation Diagram) is shown in figure 5. 1 Info Flow Plan of the Recommended System Level 0 1 . 0 Training course Year Section Rooms Subject matter Teacher several. 0 Make Reports installment payments on your 0 Process Schedule intended for Term Dean Administrator Processed Schedule Plan Figure some. 3 Level 0 of Data Flow Diagram Figure some. 3 displays the review process as a whole.
It begins from the Admin, the user, with corresponding data that goes to different menus offered by the system. These are basically the principal inputs to be processed by system which will creates reviews. This diagram is mainly the representation in the software developed. Level you of Method 1: Document Maintenance 1 ) 1 Add Course Dean | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 . 2 Add Year | | | | | | | | | | | 1 . several Add Bedrooms | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 . four Add Themes | | | | | | | 1 ) 5 Add Teachers 1 ) 6 Put Section Physique 4. 5 Level one particular of Data Stream Diagram The diagram Level 1 shows the procedure of accessing the file repair.
The diagram shows tips on how to add, change, update and delete a data. It provides space for the user to input new data for the database. Level 2 Process 2: Plan Management | | | | | | 2 . 1| | | | 2 . 2| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DEAN| | Institution Year| | | | Filled up| | | | | | Saved| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fill up| Schedule| | Update| | | D6 Schedule| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | schedule| | | | schedule| | | | | | | | Section| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Subject matter List| form| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Room| | | | | | | Updated| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Day| | | | | | | Schedule| | | | | Time| Schedule| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | installment payments on your 3| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Schedule| | | | Printing Report| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | STUDENTS| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Figure 4. 5 Level 2 of Data Flow Picture The diagram Level a couple of shows the method of accessing the Routine Management. The consumer will fill up the routine form. Following making the schedule, the consumer can also print out the record. Level 3 Process three or more: Generate Reports| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | D7| Schedule| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Saved Schedule| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Section Schedule| | | | | | | three or more. 2| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | three or more. 1| | | | | | | | | | | | DEAN| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Make Schedule| | | | | Make Room| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Section Reports| | | | | | Schedule Reports| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Room Schedule| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Schedule| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pupils Figure four. 6 Level 3 of Data Flow Picture The picture Level 5 shows the related procedures that the system supplies under the statement button. That shows the section routine and place schedule reviews. System Evaluation Report The respondents with this study responded so well over the survey process. The advocates got an excellent approval of improving the existing system in the proposed one particular project. Portion I. 1 ) Suitability The system’s physical appearance is suitable for it is use Stand 4. you Suitability
Suitability| Number| of| | Percentage of| Angle| size| intended for Pie| | | Respondents| | respondents evaluating| Chart| | | | | | | | the suitability of the| | | | | | | | | system| | | | 4″Strongly Agree| 200| | | 200/229 by 100 = 87%| 87% of 360 = 320| 3| ” Agree| 29| | | 29/229 x 100 sama dengan 13%| 13% of 360 = 40| 2| ” Disagree| 0| | | 0| 0| | | 1| ” Strongly| 0| | | 0| 0| | | Disagree| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Suitability| | | | | | | | | 13%| | | | | | | | | | | Strongly Agree| | | | | | | | | | Agree| | | | | | | | | | 87%| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Figure 4. 1 Quiche Chart to get System Appropriateness
Figure 5. 1 implies that 87% or perhaps 200 in the respondents highly agreed that the system is suitable and 13% or 30 of the respondents agreed in the suitability in the system. installment payments on your Interoperability The system’s ICONs are all doing work Table 4. 2 Interoperability Interoperability| Number| of| Percentage of| Angle| size| to get Pie| | | Respondents| respondents evaluating| Chart| | | | | | | the interoperability of the| | | | | | | | system| | | | 4″Strongly Agree| 199| | 199/229 back button 100 = 87%|??? of 360 = 313| 3| ” Agree| 30| | 30/229 x 95 = 13%| 13% of 360 sama dengan 47| 2| ” Disagree| 0| | 0| 0| | | | ” Strongly| 0| | 0| 0| | | Disagree| | | | | | | Interoperability 13% Strongly Acknowledge Agree 87% Figure four. 2 Cake Chart to get System Interoperability Figure some. 2 demonstrates 87% or 199 from the respondents highly agreed the system is doing work and 13% or 30 with the respondents agreed in the interoperability of the system. 3. Complying The system facilitates the overall performance they need. Table 4. several Compliance Compliance| Number| of| Percentage of| Angle| size| for Pie| | | Respondents| respondents evaluating| Chart| | | | | | | the compliance of the| | | | | | | | system| | | | “Strongly Agree| 198| | 198/229 x 100 = 86%| 86% of 360 = 310| 3| ” Agree| 31| | 31/229 times 100 = 14%| 14% of 360 = 50| 2| ” Disagree| 0| | 0| 0| | | 1| ” Strongly| 0| | 0| 0| | | Disagree| | | | | | | Conformity 14% Firmly Agree Acknowledge 86% Number 4. a few Pie Graph for Program Compliance Physique 4. several shows that 86% or 198 of the respondents strongly arranged that the system supports the system they need and 14% or perhaps 31 of the respondents arranged in the compliance of the system. Part II 2 . System’s Usability The machine is easy to work with and find their way Table four. 4 Understandability
Understandability| Number| of| Percentage of| Angle| size| pertaining to Pie| | | Respondents| respondents evaluating| Chart| | | | | | | the understandability of| | | | | | | | the system| | | | 4″Strongly Agree| 229| | 229/229 back button 100 sama dengan 100%| totally of 360 = 360| 3| ” Agree| 0| | 0| 0| | | 2| ” Disagree| 0| | 0| 0| | | 1| ” Strongly| 0| | 0| 0| | | Disagree| | | | | | | Understandability Strongly Agree fully Figure four. 4 Pie Chart for System Understandability Figure 5. 4 demonstrates 100% or 229 in the respondents firmly agreed that the system is clear and understandable.. Learnability The device is easy to use and get around Table four. 5 Learnability Learnability| Number| of| Percentage of| Angle| size| to get Pie| | | Respondents| respondents evaluating| Chart| | | | | | | the learnability of the| | | | | | | | system| | | | 4″Strongly Agree| 198| | 198/229 times 100 = 86%| 86% of 360 = 310| 3| ” Agree| 31| | 31/229 x 75 = 14%| 14% of 360 sama dengan 50| 2| ” Disagree| 0| | 0| 0| | | 1| ” Strongly| 0| | 0| 0| | | Disagree| | | | | | | Learnability 14% Strongly Consent Agree 86% Figure 5. 5 Quiche Chart pertaining to System Learnability Figure 4. shows that 86% or 198 of the respondents strongly agreed that the product is easy to use and navigate and 14% or perhaps 31 in the respondents agreed in the navigation of the system. Part III ” System’s Reliability 1 ) Accuracy The system gives an accurate output. Stand 4. six Accuracy Accuracy| Number| of| Percentage of| Angle| size| for Pie| | | Respondents| participants evaluating| Chart| | | | | | | the precision of the| | | | | | | | system| | | | 4″Strongly Agree| 200| | 200/229 x 75 = 87%| 87% of 360 = 313| 3| ” Agree| 29| | 29/229 back button 100 sama dengan 13%| 13% of 360 = 47| 2| ” Disagree| 0| | 0| 0| | | | ” Strongly| 0| | 0| 0| | | Disagree| | | | | | | Accuracy 13% Firmly Agree Agree 87% Number 4. 6th Pie Chart for System Accuracy Physique 4. 6 shows that 87% or two hundred of the respondents strongly decided that the system gives appropriate output and 13% or 29 of the respondents agreed in the accuracy and reliability of the system. 2 . Restoration The system provides ability to recover form failure. Table four. 7 Recovery Recovery| Number| of| Percentage of| Angle| size| to get Pie| | | Respondents| respondents evaluating| Chart| | | | | | | the recovery of the| | | | | | | system| | | | 4″Strongly Agree| 198| | 198/229 x 100 = 86%| 86% of 360 sama dengan 310| 3| ” Agree| 31| | 31/229 times 100 sama dengan 14%| 14% of 360 = 50| 2| ” Disagree| 0| | 0| 0| | | 1| ” Strongly| 0| | 0| 0| | | Disagree| | | | | | | Restoration 14% Strongly Agree Concur 86% Physique 4. six Pie Graph for Program Accuracy Figure 4. 7 shows that 86% or 198 of the respondents strongly agreed that the system has ability to recover contact form failure and 14% or perhaps 31 of the respondents decided in the recovery of the system. Part IV ” Anatomy’s Efficiency 1 . Resource Behavior
The system offers an optimum usage of the resources. Stand 4. eight Resource Habit Resource| Number| of| Percentage of| Angle| size| to get Pie| Behavior| Respondents| respondents evaluating| Chart| | | | | | | the source behavior of| | | | | | | | the system| | | | 4″Strongly Agree| 195| | 195/229 back button 100 sama dengan 85%| 85% of 360 = 306| 3| ” Agree| 34| | 34/229 x 100 = 15%| 15% of 360 = 54| 2| ” Disagree| 0| | 0| 0| | | 1| ” Strongly| 0| | 0| 0| | | Disagree| | | | | | | Resource Behavior 15% Firmly Agree Consent 85% Determine 4. 8 Pie Graph for Program Resource Behavior Figure some. shows that 85% or 195 of the participants strongly arranged that the program provides an the best possible utilization of the resources and 15% or 34 of the participants agreed in the resource habit of the program. 2 . Period Behavior The system responses in time or since needed. Stand 4. 9 Time Habit Time Behavior| Number| of| Percentage of| Angle| size| for Pie| | | Respondents| respondents evaluating| Chart| | | | | | | the time habit of the| | | | | | | | system| | | | 4″Strongly Agree| 201| | 201/229 x 75 = 88%| 88% of 360 = 317| 3| ” Agree| 28| | 28/229 by 100 sama dengan 12%| 12% of 360 = 43| 2| ” Disagree| 0| | 0| 0| | | | ” Strongly| 0| | 0| 0| | | Disagree| | | | | | | Period Behavior 12% Strongly Concur Agree 88% Figure four. 9 Pie Chart pertaining to System Period Behavior Physique 4. on the lookout for shows that 88% or 201 of the participants strongly decided that the system responses punctually or since needed and 12% or 29 from the respondents decided in the period behavior of the system. System Evaluation intended for AMACC ” Lipa Campus Students 1 ) System’s Efficiency Table some. 10 Anatomy’s Functionality Criteria| Strongly| Agree| Disagree| Strongly| Weighted| Rank| | Agree| | | Disagree| Mean| | Suitability| 200| 29| 0| 0| 3. 7| 1| Interoperability| 199| 30| 0| 0| 3. 87| 1| Compliance| 198| 31| 0| 0| 3. 87| 2| 2 . System’s Simplicity Table four. 11 Anatomy’s Usability Criteria| Strongly| Agree| Disagree| Strongly| Weighted| Rank| | Agree| | | Disagree| Mean| | Understandability| 229| 0| 0| 0| 4| 1| Learnability| 198| 31| 0| 0| three or more. 86| 2| 3. Anatomy’s Reliability Stand 4. 12 System’s Dependability Criteria| Strongly| Agree| Disagree| Strongly| Weighted| Rank| | Agree| | | Disagree| Mean| | Accuracy| 200| 29| 0| 0| three or more. 87| 1| Recovery| 198| 31| 0| 0| a few. 86| 2| 4. Anatomy’s Efficiency Table 4. 12
System’s Efficiency Criteria| Strongly| Agree| Disagree| Strongly| Weighted| Rank| | Agree| | | Disagree| Mean| | Resource Behavior| 195| 34| 0| 0| 3. 85| 2| Period Behavior| 201| 28| 0| 0| three or more. 88| 1| Over-all System Evaluation of AMACC ” Lipa Campus Students Stand 4. 13 Over-all Program Evaluation of AMACC ” Lipa Grounds Students Criteria| Strongly| Agree| Disagree| Strongly| Weighted| Rank| | Agree| | | Disagree| Mean| | Functionality| 199| 28| 0| 0| 3. 88| 1| Usability| 142| 31| 0| 0| 3. 82| 2| Reliability| 199| 30| 0| 0| 3. 87| 1| Efficiency| 198| 31| 0| 0| 3. 6| 3| Stand 4. 21 Verbal Interpretation of Analysis Result Option| Scale| Verbal Interpretation| 4| 3. 40 ” four. 00| Highly Agree| 3| 2 . 55 ” several. 54| Agree| 2| 1 . 55 ” 2 . 54| Disagree| 1| 1 . 00 ” 1 . 54| Firmly Disagree| | Table 5. 27| | Interpretation of Over-all Analysis of AMACC ” Lipa Campus Student| | | | | Criteria| Weighted Mean| Verbal| Rank| | | Interpretation| | Functionality| 3. 88| Strongly Agree| 1| Usability| 3. 82| Strongly Agree| 2| Reliability| 3. 87| Strongly Agree| 1| Efficiency| 3. 86| Strongly Agree| 3| Average| | Firmly Agree| |
How do we help?
We have compiled for you lists of the best essay topics, as well as examples of written papers. Our service helps students of High School, University, College
