26085951

Development

Based on the Social Learning Theory, our moral behavior is shaped by the reinforcement and punishment stimuli through the process of learning. It means that if a child was punished in past times for a particular behavior and it is faced with such a situation again, he/she is going to avoid this behavior. As a social staying, a person lives in a group or maybe a community and “tends to do actions and behave within a manner favorable to community approval.

The greatest criticism on this theory is that “it would not provide a correct overall individuality assessment. “It focuses even more on the elements perceived as adverse by the student ” it does not account for what may be deemed positive.  (Social Learning Theory)

According to Kohlberg’s theory of ethical development, “there are 6 identifiable phases of moral development which could be classified in to three amounts. (Kohlberg’s levels of moral development) The pre-conventional level. In stage one particular, “people respond according to socially appropriate norms as they are told for this by a few authority figure. “This behavior is motivated by the danger or putting on punishment.  Stage a couple of “is seen as a view that right tendencies means operating in their own greatest interests. (Barger, Robert In. A

Overview Of Lawrence Kohlberg’s Phases Of Moral Development) The conventional level. In stage 3 people “seek acceptance from other people’. Stage 5 is “oriented to remaining by the law and addressing the obligations of duty. (Barger, Robert N. A) The post-conventional level. Stage 5 is usually “an comprehension of social mutuality and an authentic interest in the welfare more.  Level 6 is usually “based in respect pertaining to universal rules and the requirements of specific conscience.  (Barger, Robert N. A) It appears that persons rarely reach stage 6 of this version and Kohlberg “had difficulty finding members who work with it. (Kohlberg’s stages of ethical development)

“One criticism of Kohlberg’s theory is that it emphasizes rights to the exclusion of other values and “may not adequately addresses the quarrels of people who benefit other meaningful aspects of actions.  Jean Gilligan provides argued that the theory is definitely “male-centric and “did not really adequately describe the concerns of women. (Kohlberg’s periods of moral development) Kohlberg stated hissix periods are cultural-universal. Simpson (1974) argues that “Kohlberg’s interview employs analytic and assumptive modes of thought and language just like “justice, equal rights and reciprocity at if you are a00 of abstraction which are not valued by many people cultures. According to Bergling (1981), Kohlberg’s stages you ” four are “empirically supported in western developing countries but findings from the Bahamas and British Honduras fail to support even a level 4. (Ma, King Keung Problems Inside the Cross-Cultural Study Of Moral Wisdom Development)

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

1. Barger, Robert In. A Summary Of Lawrence Kohlberg’s Phases Of Moral Advancement, (August, twenty three 2005)
2. Kohlberg’s stages of ethical development, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohlberg’s_stages_of_moral_development (August, twenty three 2005)
3. Ma, King Keung Problems Inside the Cross-Cultural Examine Of Moral Common sense Development
4. http://66.249.93.104/searchq=cache:LAHMEA0UqdAJ:sunzi1.lib.hku.hk/hkjo/view/33/3300251.pdf+weak+points+in+Kohlberg%60s+moral+development+theory+,hl=uk (August, 3 2005)
5. Interpersonal Learning Theory, http://www.termpapergenie.com/SocialLearningTheory.html (August, 24 2005)

Tweet