53516061

You read ‘Hcm Chapter 15 11 12’ in category ‘Essay examples’ Can switch on and off at will. Counterfactual thinking emotionally changing a few aspect of yesteryear as a way of imagining what might have been. Aiyah why never get gold but i acquired silver

Thought suppression Attempt to avoid contemplating something we might prefer to neglect. Like former mate gf, stomachache etc . Monitoring process , automatic component, searches for evidence that the undesirable thought is around to intrude the consciousness. Then the working process , controlled component comes into play. The effortful try to distract yourself by finding something else to think of. When one is lacking in energy or preoccupied (under intellectual load), the operating method lets the intruding believed go uncontrolled leading to hyperaccessibility , the unwanted thought occurs with high frequency The ore you desperately try not to think of something, the more that intrudes. Overconfidence barrier Persons usually have excessive confidence in the accuracy of judgments (sure pass! sure this sure that) break this obstacle by addressing overconfidence directly, giving probability of them staying wrong educate people straight some basic statistical and methodological principles to understand how to explanation correctly, and hoping they may apply these principles PHASE 4 Interpersonal Perception examine of how we form impressions of and make inferences about others non-verbal interaction how persons communicate deliberately or inadvertently without words. ody dialect, touch and so forth Mirror neurons brain cell that react when we carry out an action and once we see someone else perform similar action. When folks yawn, we all yawn. quickly and involuntarily. Encode Exhibit non-verbal patterns like grinning Decode To interpret this is of nonverbal behavior. was the smile legitimate or cynical 6 major emotions that may be recognised cross-culturally happiness, unhappiness, fear, anger, surprise, outrage. Maybe contempt and take great pride in. Affect combines one section of the face signs up one emotion while one more part registers a ifferent emotion. mixture of anger and disgust. This makes decoding occasionally inaccurate Display rules particular to each culture, and determine the type of feelings people will need to show. Emblems gestures with clear, well understood meanings , central finger, gangsta Implicit character theory Form of schema utilized to group several personality traits jointly. Someone who is usually kind is likewise generous Relying on schemas may well lead us to make wrong assumptions, might even resort to sterotype One culture’s implicit persona theory could be different from another.

America provides “Artistic personality” but China have no schizzo for that. Attribution theory the way we infer reasons for people’s tendencies Internal don Attribute a behavior to someone’s personal traits don’t give money cos selfish Exterior attribution Feature behavior to a situation away from person’s qualities didn’t give money cos coach was approaching Covariation model To form a rational and logical attribution by what caused a behavior, all of us note the pattern involving the presence or perhaps absence of feasible causal elements and set up behavior takes place. why she dont give me? performed she value to lend myself? does the girl lend to others? ” Consensus information degree to which other folks behave the same way towards the same stimulus as me (low consensus: boss only yells at me) Distinctiveness information how the actor responds to other stimuli (low distinctiveness: boss yells at others too) Uniformity information consistency with which the observed behavior between same actor and same stimulus occur over time and scenario (high consistency: boss yells at me everytime this individual sees me) When the above info combine into a routine, attribution is created.

Internal don , consensus and distinctiveness low, consistency high External attribution , consensus, distinctiveness, consistency substantial Situational attribution , assumes something unusual because persistence low. People rely even more on persistence and distinctiveness info and fewer on opinion info. Correspondence bias Inclination to infer that peoples’ behavior compares to their composition and personality. I lay on reserved seats because i actually am disrespectful Perceptual salience seeming significance of information this is the focus of householder’s attention. If we can’t start to see the situation, we ignore their importance. e pay attention to persons instead (easier to see than the situation) and tend to think that they trigger their own patterns. Two step process of making attributions 1 . Internally attribute. (quickly and spontaneously) 2 . Then adapt this attribution by taking into consideration the situation the person was in. Although often , we all don’t adapt enough, so when we are sidetracked or preoccupied, we by pass this step, producing an extreme inner attribution. (requires effort and conscious attention) if we consciously slow down and think carefully, and if we’re enthusiastic to reach an exact judgment, all of us will go the second step.

Actor/observer difference trend to see other people’s behavior while caused by individuality but to discover one’s own behavior while caused by scenarios Because of perceptual salience , notice other peoples behavior more than the situation. recognize our own scenario more than our behavior. Precisely what is most salient to me? i don’t often look inward. I appear outward and for that reason my circumstance more than myself. Because of information availability. I am aware more about myself so have more regularity and distinctiveness information about personally. and therefore OUTWARDLY ATTRIBUTE. Self-serving attribution endency to take credit for my personal success simply by internal attribution, but pin the consequence on others or situation pertaining to failure. Actually just want to preserve self-esteem in so doing. We as well just desire others to believe well of us. Due to the form of information open to people, I am aware i failed to score well for the test because it is unfair. I know i actually am wise. but my personal teacher feels i was stupid. Several info. Protective attributions details for patterns that protect us by vulnerability and mortality thoughts believing that bad items only eventually bad persons. or port diseases eventually us and that we take steps to deny the fact. Belief in a just world) In countries with intense rich and poor, simply world morals are more common, compared with countries with more evenly distributed wealth. Self-serving bias common in many european societies nevertheless less in Asian cultures where principles of modesty and harmony is appreciated (china, asia etc) Individualistic cultures , look exterior themselves to explain failure Collectivistic cultures , look inward to explain failure, garnering compassion and consideration which tones up harmony between people PHASE 5 Self-concept knowledge about who also we are Self-awareness act of thinking about ourself

Cocktail party impact , in a crowded area yu capture someone declare ur name with picky attention. after hearing very own name in irrelevant stream, percentage of errors pertaining to the relevant stream increased spotlight effect , mistaken impressino that ppl are seeing u in fact only 23% Self-awareness and self-concept combine to create identity. As kids, we have tangible self-concepts, referring to clear-cut visible characteristics like age, sex, hobbies. As adults, we emphasise emotional states and considerations of how others judge us 3rd party view of self Defining oneself regarding one’s personal internal thoughts, feelings, and actions.

Interdependent view of self Determining oneself with regards to relationships with others and recognising that behavior is generally determined by believed, feelings, and actions of others. Westerns take more to independent sense of self than Cookware culture. Females have more relational interdependence , focusing even more on associations. More likely to discuss emotions than men Mankind has collective interdependence , focusing on memberships in larger teams. Like sporting activities teams Self-awareness theory when folks focus attention on themselves, they examine and review behavior to internal criteria and beliefs. hen folks are self-aware, that reminds them of a perception of right and wrong and are less likely to go overboard. East asians likely to include outside perspective of personal (how others see them). Western have insider perspective (individualistic) Causal theories Hypotheses about what influences feelings and behavior like “absence makes the heart increase fonder” Reason-generated attitude transform attitude modify resulting from taking into consideration the reasons for the attitudes. you assume your attitude matches the reasons which might be plausible and simple to verbalise. break up because she chews gum fully.

Self-perception theory when our feelings and attitudes will be uncertain, we all infer the feelings by watching our patterns and the circumstance which this occurs. We infer only if we are not sure how we experience. And we evaluate whether each of our behavior genuinely reflects how we feel or perhaps because it is the specific situation that produced us take action that way. not sure if i just like classical music. but we listen to ninety two. 4 willingly. therefore i must love time-honored music. if gf listens to korean song but not me who tuned in, then i am unlikely to summarize that i pay attention because i prefer it Inbuilt motivation esire to engage in an activity because i enjoy this Extrinsic motivation desire to employ because of the benefits that come with that According to self-perception theory, If i had been initially intrinsically motivated, but was instead paid out to do it, the motivation will certainly slowly change to extrinsic and i’ll eventually lose genuine interest for this. Over-justification result results when i view my own behavior as caused by extrinsic reasons, producing me underestimate the level to which the behavior is due to intrinsic factors Task-contingent rewards rewards pertaining to doing a activity regardless of results

Performance-contingent rewards rewards from how well i execute a task two factor theory of sentiment idea that psychological experience is because of a 2-step self-perception method in which i first knowledge physiological arousal then search for an appropriate justification for it. Misattribution of arousal making wrong inferences by what is triggering them to go through the way they do standing on a swaying link and receiving a request to carry out a survey coming from a chiobu. your first heightened heartrate due to the frightening bridge is misattributed to u preference the girl Appraisal theories of emotion

The emotion depends upon what way you interpret or explain the big event, in the absense of internal arousal. You need to go mediterranean sea sch. your friend gets in instead. you feel endangered and therefore moody. Fixed mindset we have a set volume of an ability that cannot change. set intelligence, athletic ability and so forth likely to surrender after challenges. less likely to hone abilities Growth attitude abilities are malleable characteristics that can progress and grow. view challenges as in order to improve Sociable comparison theory learn about very own abilities and attitudes by simply comparing with others

Down social comparability compare with somebody lousier to feel better about myself Upward interpersonal comparison match up against someone preferable to have a goal to strive towards Social tuning groups of friends or people using similar behaviour through social influence Self-regulatory resource unit stats that individuals must have a good amount of energy while we are trying to control our activities. Suggests that the degree of glucose inside the bloodstream is spent once we exert self-control Impression administration attempt to get others to view me the way i want to be seen. Facebook

Ingratiation using flattery or praise to make personally likeable to a different, often a higher-status person (ANGKAT) self-handicapping people create road blocks and reasons for themselves so if they certainly poorly on a task, people avoid blaming themselves. Self-handicap by creating obstacles that reduce the chance they will be successful on a job. So in the event they fail, they pin the consequence on on these obstacles instead of lack of ability. Contains drugs, alcoholic beverages, failure to organize Also simply by devising ready-made excuses in case they fail. Test anxiety, moods, symptoms, events through the past.

We may evntually imagine the justifications and apply less work in future. Persons dislike other folks who self-handicap so they will run the risk of informal calamité. Eastern ethnicities like to preserve face more than western cultures, and have a far more independent watch of themselves than ang moh. PART 6 Intellectual dissonance the impression of discomfort when you keep 2 or even more inconsistent intuition. caused by a task that is usually against a person’s usual, typically positive self-conception reduce cacophonie by: changing behavior (stop smoking) changing dissonant c?ur (nah.. igs don’t trigger cancer) adding new cognitions (my grand daddy smoke a great deal also hardly ever kena) people experiencing cacophonie deny or perhaps distort actuality to reduce this. Impact prejudice when people consider how they can react to long term negative incidents, they overestimate the depth of duration of their negative emotional reactions. Like overestimate emo-time when u break up The need to keep self-esteem prospects us to rationalise the behavior, which may not always be rational considering. Post-decisional cacophonie when following making a decision you believe more within your choice and devaluate the rejected decision. he crucial and more hard to revoke your decision, the greater the dissonance. eg which car to by vs which in turn cup irrevocability of a decision always raises dissonance plus the motivation to reduce it. lowballing technique , initially quotation low price, following customer makes a decision to buy, claim it was a blunder, actual price are higher. often customer is going to still buy. Because there is currently a dedication of forms. Decision to behave immorally Cheating , if u didnt view the chem conventional paper you didn’t have got into SMU Dissonance theory says i will justify the action by simply minimising the negative areas of the action i chose.. e. changing my attitude regarding cheating that it must be not so bad and everyone would it. In terms of personal values: the cheat and non-cheat in the beginning starts perfectly attitude. following one decides their path, the frame of mind towards cheating diverges greatly as a consequence of activities, moving towards one intense (from the not bad versus it’s bad diverge to cheating is not a big deal. vs expel cheaters! ) Approval of efforts tendency for individuals to increase their liking for something they will worked hard to attain. the tougher the initiation, the more we such as the group (go OCS i love it and so much)

External justification cause of dissonant personal behavior that resides outside of the individual, to be able to receive a significant reward or perhaps avoid severe punishment good friend altered an ugly gown so now simply cannot return. as she previously changed that, just tell her u love it. you don’t want to harm her by saying it sucks. Inside justification lowering of cacophonie by changing something about one self like frame of mind. when simply cannot find exterior justification, will attempt to find internal. if the same friend is very abundant and buying another dress isn’t a problem, your external justifying reasons for lying to her can be minimal. to you experience inner justification, by simply noticing good quality things about the gown. eventually, you can expect to like the fugly dress. This really is counterattitudinal advocacy , takes place when we claim to have an thoughts and opinions that varies from our the case beliefs. once we do this with little external justification, and even more internal justific, we will believe is actually more and more such as the lie we all told. Hypocrisy induction sexual arousal levels of dissonance by making transactions that counter-top peoples’ manners and then reminding them in the inconsistency among what they advocated and their behavor.

This goal is to lead individuals to even more responsible patterns counterattitudinal advocacy example. those who are made conscious of their hypocrisy between the claims they make and the initial values begin to practice what they preach. Insufficient treatment dissonance once individuals shortage sufficient exterior justification for achieveing resisted a desired activity or subject, usually resulting in devaluing the forbidden activity or object. insufficient treatment causes inadequate external reason, which makes 1 internally rationalize. eg. child bully. n punishment is definitely harsh , sufficient external justification (i dont beat him cos teacher is going to cane). if punishment is usually mild, (why am i certainly not beating him up? ) the anstoß will stay away from beating, although he desires to. but this individual lacks full justification for not beating, therefore he will decrease dissonance by simply convincing himself that he does not really want to beat up the guy. Little reward or perhaps mild treatment leads to internal justification -, self-persuasion -, lasting change. Self-persuasion reliable form of frame of mind change that results from endeavors at self-justification. ore everlasting that immediate attempts in persuasion by others mainly because persuasion takes place internally. Bill franklin result when we execute a favour to get a person we do not like, we will end up choice the person more. How do u hate your victims? persuade yourself that the ppl u killed are less than individual convince your self they earned to be injure similar to nazis convincing themselves jews happen to be subhuman Dissonance-reducing behavior significantly less prevalent in collectivist civilizations on the surface area. Also may be that self-justification occurs in collectivistic communities in more public ways. In japan, dissonance reduced after saying a boring task is interesting.

Additionally , if a jap observes a person this individual knows and likes saying the which the boring activity is interesting, he himself will knowledge dissonance and change attitudes. PART 8 Conformity Changing your behavior as a result of real or imagined influences of others Informational social affect influence of others leads us to adjust because we see them being a source of facts to guide patterns. We believe that others’ presentation of an ambiguous situation is more accurate than ours, and definitely will help us choose an appropriate course of action. ladies learning what an attractive body is from relatives, friends and media. en’s body has to be muscular (mens health, gyms etc) Exclusive acceptance adapt behavior of others because honestly believe that the other people will be correct Community compliance adapt to behavior of others without actually believing what they do is correct. to prevent looking foolish or foolish. By planning to get things right, you are more susceptible to informational sociable influence. In low importance conditions , conform to other folks less than in high importance conditions. (same answers pertaining to CAT and AS midterm) The greater important the choice is to us, the more we will count on others for information.

Contagion quick spread of emotions or perhaps behavior by using a crowd for example mass panic of warfare of the planets Mass psychogenic illness event of identical physical symptoms with no regarded physical cause in a group of people. begins with one or some reporting physical symptoms, then simply others who observe these sick and tired people were more likely to fall sick and tired too. Advertising also disseminates mass psychogenic illness quickly. maybe H1N1 swine influenza n sars. Ambiguous situation The more unclear you will be, the more u will rely on others. Turmoil situation we see how others respond and do likewise (stampedes) When other folks are specialists he more expertise a person has, he will become a valuable guide in an ambiguous situation Interpersonal norms rules for suitable behaviors, principles and beliefs deviants can be ridiculed, punished, rejected Normative social influence when affect of others potential clients us to conform to become liked and accepted by them. (all the 369 tattoos in forehead) results in public compliance and not automatically private acceptance we tend to wear what’s trendy but do u really believe that pad caps will be that nice? women’s attempts to create great body that u learned through informational influence. males go fitness center Asch line (long series study) onformity occured due to fear of staying the lone dissenter we conform pertaining to normative factors because we all dont desire social disapproval even from complete strangers. also, all of us feel pain and pressure when we operate for philosophy and not in favor of the group What if you resist ordre social effect? group will attempt to align you with their philosophy by increased communication through teasing and long conversations if most fails, then simply start to claim negative points and take away from me personally Cultural definitions of appealing body alterations throughout the years. last period, fat lady was appealing, because looks healthy and fertile.

Today, models almost all so slim. Jap traditions places superb emphasis on conformity than american culture. Normative pressure being skinny is more for Japs than americans Social influence theory probability that i reply to social influence by other folks depends on durability: how important to me is the group? immediacy: just how close may be the group to my opinion in space and period during the attempt to influence me personally? number: how many people in the group? conformity raises as the factors over increase. Group size and social effect Conformity improved when zero of group increased. over and above 3 persons, conformity does not increase very much.

Groups we all identify highly with and we like is going to exert more normative influence on all of us. Conforming to a group earns idiosyncracy credits (can sometimes deviate via group norms without sanction) When no person else inside the group believes the same as you, normative cultural influence is a highest. You tend to adapt them. When you have you ally, pressure to adjust greatly lessens. (12 upset men example) when group’s culture is usually collectivistic, individuals are highly contouring because of factors like co-operation and commitment. Conformity in collective nationalities is a valued trait. but also in western it is a negative characteristic.

Hunting/Fishing culture (western) beliefs assertiveness and independence. Farming (eastern) ideals value supportive, conformity. Fraction influence case where community of group members affect behavior of majority. through consistency. retain expressing precisely the same view, and different members of minority need to agree with each other. majority eventually takes see. minorities exert influence through informational means, not normative. Majorities get hold of public conformity through normative influence Hispanics obtain exclusive acceptance through informational affect. 12 angry men best example. Injunctive norms eoples’ perceptions of what behaviors happen to be approved or perhaps disapproved by simply others. Stimulate behavior through punishment or perhaps rewards. Littering is incorrect. “DO CERTAINLY NOT LITTER” more powerful in the face although promote normative conformity. (public compliance) Detailed norms perceptions of how people actually respond in presented situations, irrespective of whether behavior is approved by others or not. Motivate behavior by informing people about what works well or adaptable behavior. Littering is wrong (injunctive). Sometimes where people are likely to litter (Descriptive norms) “LITTERING CAN BE NOT WHAT PEOPLE DO HERE”

Less powerful in the face yet promote informational influence. makes positive transform. Boomerang result by giving a great “average” as a norm, people who usually did less than the average might conclude increasing the experience to meet the “average”, therefore defeating the objective of decreasing the undesirable habit. For example alcohol drinking. “descriptive norm & injunctive norm” mixed text messages will have a good effect on scaling down undesirable patterns. “you applied this much energy. On average, people use back button amount of one’s a day (descriptive , what society does).

You used X+2 strength &gt,: ( (the face showing disapproval is injunctive , precisely what is viewed as wrong. ) Behavior to specialist behavior of soldiers built killing appear like the right issue (informational influence) and troops wanted to prevent rejection by others (normative influence) my own lai town massacre. Milgram’s studies Power say “it is essential you continue” hard to say no to insistent authority Ordre influence , acting on their very own influence to become accepted by others If the authority remaining the room not enough informational effect When specialist was substituted by a regular person this individual lacks knowledge, no motivation to follow

Significance of authority numbers when 2 authority statistics disagreed about whether to stay the study, thereby creating ambigous definition of the situation, 100% of the participants halted conforming. Other reasons we comply with Conforming to the wrong norm Once u follow 1 norm, it is hard to switch before your done. (slowly understanding that providing electric shock absorbers was not very good but still continued) Difficult to abandon the “obey authority” norm in Milgram because: test was active, preventing reflection on the circumstance. of self-justification. Initial arrangement to do test created internal pressure to obey subsequently.

As individuals delivered each shock, that they justified in their heads, and successive ladder made it hard to decide when to stop (215 and 230 volts little different) of loss of personal responsibility. Experimenters are responsible for end results, and i also am “just following orders” Unethical studies have Deception hiding accurate purpose of the analysis No the case informed permission not advised of the full details of study Psychological distress Not really told that were there right to pull away Inflicted information when the research ended, some learnt reasons for having themselves that they can didnt accept beforehand (like obey instructions to hurt someone)