89855298

The theory of Opportunity-Reduction supports Neighborhood View program. This theory presumes that the initiative of potential crime victims or the people could help reducing the risk of criminals’ attack (Kilpatrick, 2004). The Opportunity-Reduction style involves 4 categories including (1) increasing perceived work, (2) elevating perceived risks, (3) minimizing anticipated benefits, and (4) inducing guilt or shame (or eliminating excuses, Clarke, 1997) (Clarke and Homel, 1997).

The last category which is inducing guilt or perhaps shame was eventually disregarded in the function of Wortley (2002) since the strategies below this category usually do not involve the reduction of criminal’s possibility to attack but rather it promotes and gives the offender even more chances of undertaking illegal activities (Wortley, 1997, 1998). Rather than inducing remorse or waste, Wortley eliminates it with precipitation-control. Appropriately, this can be more beneficial in lowering permissibility pertaining to potential offenders or criminals. Wortley (2002) also gives another category which is elevating anticipated punishments which is based upon the learning theory that opinions anticipated benefits can lessen crimes.

This is certainly an effective mean of conquering crime complications and it is also applicable in real prison management (Severson, 2004). Opportunity-Reduction approach likewise supports Neighborhood Watch courses through crime prevention and self-defense online classes available for community police and citizens along with focusing on quality lifestyle by citizen participation (Kilpatrick, 2004, Whittemore, 1989, Baker, Wolfer, & Zezza, 1999).

The Canterchase residents will be able to create relationships, support and collaborate with each other. They need to speak effectively by reporting or sharing information, use protection or alert devices, employ detectors or watchdogs. They must also apply problem-oriented policing in order to discuss the nature of challenges, assign people in acquiring their tasks on criminal offense reduction and solving crime-related problems. Tactics like the SARA or scanning, analysis, response, and examination (Baker, Wolfer, & Zezza, 1999, Wolfer, Zezza, 2001) are useful in community policing and criminal offense prevention.

Recommendations

Baker, To. E., Wolfer, L., & Zezza, Ur. (1999) “Problem-Solving Policing Getting rid of Hot Spots.  The F Law Enforcement Bulletin 68(11).

Clarke, R. Sixth is v. (ed. ) (1997) Situational Crime Reduction: Successful Circumstance Studies 2nd ed. Albany, NY: Harrow & Heston.

Kilpatrick, G. G. (2004) Interpersonal Physical violence and Public Policy: What about the Patients?. Journal of Law, Remedies & Integrity 32(1), 73+.

Whittemore, M. S. (1989) Appendix C the Success of Community Crime Avoidance. Canadian Record of Criminology 31(4), 489.

Wortley, 3rd there’s r. (1997) Reconsidering the role of chance in situational crime reduction. In G. Newman, R. V. Clarke and S. G. Shohan (eds. ), Rational Choice and Situational Crime Avoidance, Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing, pp. 65″82.

Wortley, R. (1998) A two-stage model of situational crime prevention. Studies upon Crime and Crime Elimination 7, pp. 173″88.

Wortley, R. (2002) Situational Prison Control: Criminal offense Prevention in Correctional Institutions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge College or university Press.

Tweet