92515545

Identify and explain two reasons for an increase in cohabitation [17] One reason is changing social perceptions. Religion regarded cohabitation since ‘living in sin’, but today there is much less shame attached with it. Barlow et approach found raising acceptance of cohabitation.

This kind of shows that the change in religions social frame of mind, cohabitation is definitely accepted even more, leading to an increase in cohabitation. Some individuals prefer take pleasure in that focuses of on intimacy, closeness and feelings rather than the duties of relationship.

Giddens states that there has been a tendency towards confluent love. This kind of love focuses on the closeness, closeness and emotion of a relationship, rather than the feelings of obligation and duty that may be in vows at matrimony. When a relationship no longer has confluent take pleasure in, the relationship is likely to end. This kind of shows that monogamy may start getting replaced by serial monogamy, in which mélange is most fitted to. However , the ONS identified that 60% of cohabiting couples is going to eventually end in marriage demonstrating that monogamy can often substitute serial monogamy.

There is fewer pressure to adhere to traditional norms and values. Beck and Beck-Gernshiem argue that individualism has resulted in changing attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage. There is much less pressure to follow the best practice rules and beliefs around like and associations set simply by family, religion or culture. This demonstrates the change in attitudes has led to people making their own decision about whether they marry or perhaps cohabitate. The acceptance of sex exterior marriage made it much more likely that mélange will occur.

Allan and Crow argue that effective contraception has made that possible for partners to cohabit without anxiety about pregnancy. This kind of alongside the acceptance of sex just before marriage means cohabitation without marriage is likely to occur. This shows that the change in social attitudes to sex outside of marriage has led to an increase in mélange. Another reason may be the decline in the popularity of matrimony. The drawbacks that come with matrimony often have a negative impact from marital life.

McRae discovered cohabitation had been chosen above marriage because marriage was seen as restricting personal liberty and independence, offering not any advantages above cohabitation. This shows that more people began a cohabiting relationship rather than a marriage, bringing about a fall in matrimony, but an increase in mélange. Some people think it is better to have an overabundance sexual associates than to get married. Patricia Morgan states that mélange is part of a having to worry trend by which marriage is going out of fashion and the family is in decline.

It is just a sign associated with an increasing trend to have more sexual lovers and change them frequently than to agree to stable married relationships. This kind of shows that mélange is becoming widely used than marriage because people start to want more one partner for life. Mélange is a substitute for marriage Chandler argues mélange is a comparatively stable substitute for marriage and the length of time couples spend collectively is growing. This shows that it is a very good alternative to marriage, but with even more freedom.

However , the New Right claim that cohabitation is less stable than marriage and can lead to negative effects. Fear of divorce could lead to more people cohabitating, rather than having a wedding. The ONS showed that 45% of marriages ended in divorce, which could lead to persons not wanting to get married and finding to cohabit instead. This kind of shows that the fear of divorce can turn people away from relationship and looking at cohabitation, which will declines the popularity of relationship and improves cohabitation.

Related article: “My Ideal Wife

Tweet