In his 1932 content, “An Interpretation of Blake’s “‘A Work Image, ‘” Stephen Larrabee views the entire poem like a direct contrast to the “humanitarian idealism” (307) of “The Divine Photo, ” with all the author producing direct line-by-line comparisons from the two. Certainly not until late 1950s, however , will do a critic truly examine Blake’s “virtues of delight. ” In his The Piper & the Bard: A Study of William Blake, Robert Gleckner records the emotional roots of each of those virtues, while asserting that Mercy, Pity, and Peace will be each part of, but distinctive from, the fourth and finest virtue – Love.
Gleckner finally affirms the “human form divine” as a composite resin of all of the several virtues. Gleckner returns around 1962 with a comparability between “The Divine Image” and “The Human Abstract. ” While primarily worried about “The Human being Abstract, ” Gleckner will position the unity of humanity and divinity in the four virtues of “The Divine Image” against the get caught in fragmentation of the later composition.
Gleckner also dismisses “A Divine Picture, ” the poem occasionally compared with “The Divine Graphic, ” like a work with no subtlety of theme.
Another comparability between “The Divine Image” and “The Human Abstract” occurs in Harold Bloom’s 1963 text message, Blake’s Apocalypse: A Study in Poetic Argument. Here, Full bloom asserts the deliberate incompleteness of “The Divine Image” by arguing that its God is a “monster of abstractions, formed out of the supposedly human element in each of Innocence’s four prime virtues” (41). Full bloom continues simply by exploring the modifications in our virtues from poem for the other, finally exposing these people as “founded upon the exploiting selfishness of natural man” (143). “The Keen Image” obtains due important recognition the first time in 1964, when Elizabeth. D. Hirsch asserts the centrality of the poem to the Songs of Innocence along with Experience by proposing as its theme the divinity of humanity as well as the humanity of divinity.
Hirsch theorizes that Blake’s range of virtues reveals his identity with The almighty the Kid (the New Testament God) over Goodness the Father (the Old Testament God). In the 1967 discourse on the Music of Purity and of Experience, Sir Geoffrey Keynes issues himself generally with the platter of “The Divine Graphic. ” Keynes first affirms the concept of the the poem as “the identification of man with God” (Plate 18), and he then carries on by fighting that the decor on the plate – “a strange flame-like growth, half vegetable and half fire” (Plate 18) – is short for human your life. Meanwhile, David J. Cruz returns to a comparison among “The Divine Image” and “A Work Image” within a 1967 article entitled, correctly enough, “Blake’s ‘The Work Image. ‘” According to Smith, the less definite “A” in the title “A Divine Image” allows him to compare that poem’s remotely located God with all the immanent Our god of “The Divine Graphic. “
Johnson continues by simply placing the graceful speaker of “The Work Image” in a state of innocence, as a result explaining the “simplistic” oneness of the benefits in the poem. John Holloway enters the critical dialogue concerning “The Divine Image” in his late 1960s text, Blake: The Lyric Poetry. In the rather direct, new-critical browsing of Blake’s poems, Holloway compares the diction and meter of “The Keen Image” with this of church hymns of the period. Holloway claims that the poem contains no experienced quality because it is too perfectly constructed – and because that neat construction invites a retort by the reader. Gerade Bass’s 1970 article, “Songs of Innocence and of Encounter: The Thrust of Design and style, ” is made up of a narrow discussion of the relationship between the reversed “S” contour of the flame-plant in the dish of “The Divine Image” and Blake’s dramatization in the “two in contrast states” of humanity. Robert Gleckner comes back to the crucial conversation in 1977 along with his note relating to “Blake plus the Four Children of The almighty. “
In this brief content, Gleckner states that the whodunit of the 4 Daughters of God can be a supply for Blake’s four virtues in “The Divine Graphic. ” Gleckner continues by simply positing that Blake’s replacement of two of the “daughters” – Truth and Justice – with the benefits of Pity and Take pleasure in might reveal his affirmations of the unanimity of divinity and humankind, for Truth and Proper rights may be viewed as Old Legs moral virtues that are bypassed by the New Testament Christ. Zachary Head approaches home plate of “The Divine Image” from a unique angle if he asserts in 1981 the plate reinforces the poem’s theme (God as both equally transcendent and immanent) by positioning a Christ figure at the plate’s bottom (Earth) and perfect little angels figures with the plate’s top (Heaven). Innovator argues which the abstract top quality of the composition reflects Blake’s dilemma in working with the qualities of an subjective God. Heather Glen’s comprehensive examination of “The Divine Image” in her 1983 operate, Vision and Disenchantment: Blake’s Songs and Wordsworth’s Musical Ballads, posits Blake’s composition as a great “exploration in the dynamics of prayer” (150) by evaluating it with Alexander Pope’s “The Common Prayer. “
Glen illustrates the commonalities between the composition of “The Divine Image” and the structure of a medical experiment. The girl then demonstrates that the composition moves from the abstraction with the four benefits to their agreement in the individual form keen. Finally, Glen reveals the two-edged characteristics of the benefits of Whim and Shame by quarrelling that each includes a presumption of inequality within alone (an disagreement somewhat a lot like that made by Bloom in Blake’s Apocalypse). Stanley Gardner briefly paperwork the plate of “The Divine Image” in his 1986 text, Blake’s Chasteness and Experience Retraced.
Gardner asserts that the design of the plate deals with the “ideal of reconciliation created from the fulfillment of Christian compassion” (54). David Lindsay lohan also issues himself with the abstract benefits of “The Divine Image” in his 1989 work, Examining Blake’s Music. Lindsay demonstrates the transforming power that “The Human Abstract” has upon the benefits of “The Divine Image” by saying that the idolatry of the principles of shame and mercy “propagates the suffering on what its idols thrive” (80).
Finally (and perhaps fittingly), E. L. Thompson positions “The Divine Image” as the “axle upon which the Songs of Innocence turn” (146) in the 1993 text message, Witness against the Beast: Bill Blake and the Moral Law. Thompson continues by revealing the “egalitarian humanism” (153) that underlies “The Divine Image. ” According to Thompson, the poem worries not work humanity, yet human divinity. Thompson really does assert (like Hirsch) that Blake emphasizes the mankind of The almighty the Child over the divinity of Our god the Father, yet he concludes by demonstrating that the poet does not increase Christ that beats all others of the meaningful creation that shares in the same keen essence.
1