The circumstance that I would consider would be in an electioneering period, to determine the demand for presidential elections within a presented county and also understanding the existing difference involving the presidential individuals. This will also include focus on the underlying area under that the election may be lost or won through understanding the existing difference involving the presidential individuals within the region.
What is your approximate of the human population size?
The approximate of the population size will focus on the current citizens whom are eligible to vote in the county simply because they have direct influence beneath which they could have a clear concentrate and understanding under which it would be feasible to have an impact on the leads to the usa president elections (Sedgwick, 2012).
What sample size will you employ? Why?
The sample size that would be included in this circumstance would be 25% of the total population size. This is because it could be able to offer a clear understanding under which will it would be better to develop a greater representation of data that would be crucial in understanding the particular people are considering regarding the best candidate. Major on 25% of the total population size represents a larger focus and understanding about best estimation that will give a better conjecture of the ultimate findings (Bella et. approach., 2005).
How will you collect information to your sample? Illustrate your method.
The info collection in such a case will be gathered through concentrate on survey which will be conducted in a random manner through concentrate on the inclusion strategy in which all the participants who will be regarded as will be authorized voters. The survey approach is much much easier and expense effectively as more people can be utilized and provide all their honest judgment regarding the ideal presidential candidate and the existing difference between your frontrunners.
What confidence percentage will you employ? Why?
In order to find the most accurate outcomes bet upon confidence period model, Let me use 00% confidence period where the just error that is certainly considered in this instance is 1% that means which the confidence period that will be regarded as will be highly accurate. A significantly reduced percentage of error will make a key focus under which in turn it would be easier to make prediction on whose is likely to be chosen (Bella ou. al., 2005).
Results
The assurance interval evaluation was conducted where it was identified that at 99% confidence level, the main candidate would score among 49 and 57% exactly where 49% is the lower limit while 58% is the upper limit.