Ambiguity plus the undermining from the feminine

Poetry

The message of “Leda and the Swan” is often interpreted in drastically various ways due to the unconformity of the text. Much of this kind of ambiguity can be attributed to deliberate contradiction by the author, Bill Butler Yeats. This conundrum emphasizes the nature of sexism, pertaining to sexism can often be portrayed as being a misdirected watch of the patient. Several of the next critics provide differing understanding of the composition, portraying the ambiguous nature of the text and therefore the greater theme of sexism in the poem’s various supplications of a forced sexual encounter. Johnsen summarizes the poem as such, “Textual/Sexual politics hardly ever had a better example than ‘Leda and the Swan’ a sonnet describing rape as a welcome indication of a better future” (Johnsen 80). Johnsen interprets the poem’s ambiguity as indication that Leda welcomes the rape as being a positive example. Along related lines, Mckenna states, “The final form of the composition… reaffirms the tragic implications of Leda’s rape but also states her potential for self- awareness” (Mckenna 425). Like Johnsen, Mckenna wants that Leda is better through the experience, nevertheless Mckenna as well argues that the consequences with the rape (the destruction of Troy), will be what is tragic. Barnwell states differently, stating, “Often browse as a rape-poem, ‘Leda plus the Swan’ presents perhaps the clearest example of the ultimate importance of Yeat’s copulation ‘personae’ who work and are put to work in various ways to learn certain lessons” (Barnwell 63). Barnwell thus states that the poem’s center on rasurado and halving of textual content offers differing possibilities concerning who is really the victim. Leda and Zeus could both equally be victims, or neither. Lastly, Neigh argues, “When I take Yeatss sonnet personally and pursue my identifications with the text… My spouse and i identify with Leda and her experience of sexist victimization” (146). Neigh may differ drastically coming from both Barnwell and Johnsen in that your woman interprets Leda as the only victim. Empson contributes this to the following, [Ambiguity] occurs when a declaration says nothing…so that the reader is forced to invent statements of his own and they are prone to conflict with one another” (Empson 176). Each critic has significant and effective evidence because of their argument, however all understand the poem’s depiction of a forced sexual encounter in quite different techniques. Arguably, it is intentional conundrum in “Leda and the Swan” that creates ambiguity, building a larger theme of sexism due to the undermining with the oppression with the women.

In Yeats description of your sexual face, there is probably an unavoidable ambiguity because of the nature of poetry on its own, creating a contrary effort to depict a forced lovemaking encounter clearly. The result of this kind of ambiguity creates an shorting of the feminine, a theme of sexism. Holden describes the somewhat inevitable undermining the following, “Poetry which in turn attempts to explain in concrete floor detail sexual activity will usually fail and conceivable offend” (83). As Holden describes, a great artists effort to reflect a sexual encounter without it staying interpreted in differing ways is relatively inevitable. Holden explains that due to lovemaking encounter like a form of total knowledge, even poetry is definitely unequal in approaching this with charge, instead, it might simply point toward an idea of lovemaking encounter. (84). This thought can be seen in “Leda and the Swan, ” where an performers depictions of any forced intimate encounter becomes muddled due to inevitable levels found in great poetry. Barnwell notes this:

“Leda” is actually a deep and provocative dramatization in the ambiguities of sexual face for Yeats, and concerns as well as answers the major premise in his structure of thought: the idea of a great order inside the universe that supports, guides, and states all of mans endeavors in numerous ways. (62)

Barnwell argues that sexual encounters are by nature ambiguous, and “Leda and the Swan, ” the ambiguity acts as a problem to sexism whether or not men are led and therefore excused for their activities because of a greater scheme. Scott describes numerous interpretations of your forced sex encounter in art as such, “Whether their deliberate or perhaps not, people can is to do fail to start to see the oppression of women because they fail to observe macroscopically and so fail to start to see the various components of the situation because systematically related in much larger schemes” (16). In “Leda and Swan” and shorting of the feminine is created through the highly ambiguous nature in the poem, which can be attributed to the contradictory nature of ambiguous poetry plus the absoluteness of sexual encounter.

The theme of assault in “Leda and the Swan” is contrasted with the concept of the erotica, creating an ambiguity that muddles the oppression of Leda, and so can be interpreted as being a larger representation of sexism. The poem depicts a rape picture, and unintentionally or otherwise, allows for a more plausible outlook on the depiction of sexual physical violence, seen in the poems lusty diction and ambiguity to victimization. This can be seen in lines like the next, “The feathered glory coming from her loosening thighs” (Yeats 6). There is also a sort of paradox discovered in “Leda and the Swan, ” in which a readers work to understand any instance of rape tradition which Jeff identifies while, “the myth of an unrestrainable male libido serves to make sure male sexual right of access to women by delivering it like a natural want, thus enforcing the requirement of ladies sexual availability” is mingled with enthusiasm and the sexual (340). Leda’s rape by Zeus depicts this circumstance, Zeus’ fascination to Leda led to his forceful and “indifferent” acquiring of her in order to fulfill his unrestrainable needs (Yeats 15). This aggression is usually juxtaposed simply by images of sexual intercourse that question if Leda’s afeitado endows her with some kind of power or perhaps knowledge. “Did she put on his knowledge with his electrical power? ” (14). An idea of misdirection is portrayed in “Leda and the Swan, inch where a violent action is usually heavily contrasted by sensual descriptions. This kind of duality of violence as well as the erotic creates an unconformity that represents issues around sexism, where victim can often be marginalized as a result of misdirection of attention.

The style of the poem, specifically point of view and structure, shows intentional contradictions that create unconformity and challenge the girly. The point of view in “Leda as well as the Swan” encourages ambiguity having its duality of perspective. Neigh states, “The detached third person narrator ironically attracts rather than discourages identification, as the narrator gives no direction” (148). Neigh argues the fact that reader is forced to identify for differing occasions with both the swan and Leda. This kind of contradiction in perspective undermines the position of Leda and represents a larger theme of sexism. In addition , both views, the swan and Leda, shift feelings that are contradictory to one another. “A noteworthy stage is the transformed moods of both Swan and Leda. At the beginning of the poem, Swan was excited, while Leda was terrified and weak. At the end with the poem, Leda is caught up in Swan’s passion, whilst Swan becomes indifferent” (Modern English Literary works 11). Furthermore, the composition is breathless in its structure, with the initially stanza itself composed of several lines and only one sentence. The 1st three words and phrases of “A sudden strike, ” followed by a colon, creates a quickness as almost all following lines are a supplication, a list, to the declaration “a immediate blow”(1). In addition , commas will be interspersed to boost the fluidity of the stanza. This breathlessness created by just the initial stanza demonstrates a passion that is certainly contradictory of any rape picture and of Leda’s fear. A sense of indecision is just as well made as the following stanza beings a list of questions the teacher asks the class. “How may those afraid vague fingertips push/ The feathered glory from her loosening legs? / And how can body system, laid because white rush/ But go through the strange cardiovascular system beating wherever it is placed? “(5-8). While the narrator poses these questions, it creates an ambiguity as to victimization, and ultimately undermines Leda and her circumstance. The passionate and breathless structure in the poem, when depicting a forced sex encounter, adds to the ambiguity in regards to what level it really is indeed compelled. The third stanza, like the initial, is one full sentence. This quickness is followed through by last stanza, which parallels the composition of the second stanza in its listing of rhetorical questions, ultimately closing the composition with a issue, “Did the lady put on his knowledge together with his power/ Before the indifferent beak could permit her drop? ” (14-15). By ending with a problem, the entirety of the poem is given an indecisive air. By portraying ambiguity in point of view and structure, the poem provides an impressive larger concept of the sexism in its undermining of Leda and her situation as a afeitado victim.

Diction in “Leda and the Swan” contributes to the intentional double entendre, and the greater theme of sexism, in that the photographs created will be dual and contradictory in meaning. In the text, key phrases and words and phrases given such as “her legs caressed/ By the dark chain, ” “Breast upon his breast, inches “terrified hazy fingers” and”burning” offer double entendre that muddle and undermine the rape (2-3, some, 5, 10). “Her legs caressed” presents a romantic, almost tender significance, but is definitely followed by this line “By the darker webs” (2-3). This eerie contradiction produces an unconformity as to the characteristics of the sexual encounter. “Breast upon his breast, inches in its significance of femininity, seems to suggest the masculine is not present (4). Neigh publishes articles, “The picture of ‘breast after breast’ advises the possibility of a great erasure of the masculine altogether” (148). This kind of image produces additional double entendre for the text, in its not enough distinction of gender, puzzling and even shorting what it is to get feminine. The phrase “terrified vague fingers” creates contradiction with “terrified” and “vague, ” with all the former suggesting that Leda is, in a nutshell, highly worried, while “vague” suggests a far more passive mood on her part (5). The confusion, like previous phrases, undermines her position as a rape victim. Additionally , the term “burning” is highly ambiguous for the reason that it implies sexual interest and break down (10). Neigh argues, “‘Burning’ clearly share sexual desire, which usually thwarts the interpretation of rape in the poem” (148). As with other phrases, the author’s selected diction and creation of ambiguous photos undermines Leda’s situation and creates misunderstandings as to her situation. Zeus’ transformation to a swan depicts a conjunction and contradiction of both the masculine plus the feminine, rewarding the poem’s ambiguity and larger representation of sexism. Neigh argues, “With the swan’s indistinguishable gender, these vagueness encourage viewers to identify both with a raped human as well as the pleasure of a rapist”(148). With Zeus taking the form of a feminine creature, however with his actions highly hostile, there is an ambiguity developed as to what is feminine or masculine. The ambiguity in imagery hence portrays a larger theme of sexism in which a rape scene is definitely portrayed while both a rape field and a positive sexual encounter.

The mythological basis of the composition is contradictory as well in the ambiguity in the long-lasting effects of Zeus’ rape. Yeats states this, “A shiver in the loins engenders there/ The damaged wall, the burning roofing and tower/ And Agamemnon dead” (9-11). This foreshadowing of Leda and Zeus’ posterity is usually interpreted in differing ways, and shows whether Zeus’ act is seen as a punishment or since “the idea of a perfect order in the whole world that facilitates, guides, and affirms every one of man’s endeavors in various ways” (Barnwell 62). Helen, given birth to by Leda and Zeus, brings destruction and decimation to the property. “This action of physical violence exerted by simply god on the human causes the break down of Troy” (Rezaei 2). However , mythological history also offers the model that Zeus’s act created new beginnings. “Thus Zeus’ act in raping Leda meant quick a new chapter in the good the Greek. In other words, is it doesn’t beginning of any new civilization” (Modern The english language Literature 11). This double entendre of result undermines Leda’s position as a rape sufferer in that her suffering is usually interpreted to be part of a grander plan, or even as necessary.

The ambiguity of victimization in “Leda as well as the Swan” shows a larger theme of sexism through which societal tendencies dismiss objectification of women in support of erotic imagery, or tend not to focus on the rape sufferer and instead turn attention to additional aspects of effects. The poem harbours unique and deliberate contradictions that undermine beauty and represent sexism. “For Yeats, Zeuss violence shows his divinity and Ledas morality, his freedom, her bondage, violence father Appreciate and Battle with her. All things are by simply antithesis” (Johnsen 85). With this use of contradiction and halving, a variety of interpretations can be asserted, however , almost all interpretations in order to show just how Leda’s rasurado, significant in representing intimate violence, may be marginalized through poetry and analysis on its own.

Works Offered

Barnwell, W. C. The Rapist in Leda and the Swan. South Ocean Bulletin, volume. 42, no . 1, 1977, pp. 62-68.

Empson, William. Eight types of ambiguity. Vol. 645. Arbitrary House, 2004.

Holden, Jonathan. “Sex and Poetry. ” Harvard Review, number 9, 95, pp. 83–87.

Johnsen, William. Textual/Sexual Politics in Yeats’s ‘Leda and the Swan. ‘. Yeats and Postmodernism, 1991, pp. 80-89.

McKenna, Bernard. Violence, Transcendence, and Level of resistance in the Manuscripts of Yeatss Leda and the Swan. Philological Quarterly, vol. 90, number 4, 2011, pp. 425.

Neigh, Janet. “Reading from the Drop: Poetics of Identification and Yeatss ‘Leda and the Swan. ‘” Record of Modern Literature, vol. twenty nine, no . 4, 2006, pp. 145–160.

Rezaei, Hassan, and Mehdi Azari Samani. A Study of WB Yeats’s “Leda and the Swan” through the Perspective of Hallidays Systemic Functional Grammar.

Scott, Bonnie Kime, et ‘s., eds. Females in Traditions: An Intersectional Anthology pertaining to Gender and Womens Research. John Wiley Sons, 2016.

Yeats, W. W. 2 . Leda and the Swan. Modern English Literature, 1935, pp. almost eight.

Yeats, William Butler. Leda and the Swan. The Literature Network, 2017.

Tweet