Answer ohio art company s decision essay

Most of you would well in questions 3 and 4, so here I post simply sample answers to inquiries 1(a) & (b) and 2:

1(a) & 1(b): Question about whether going production to China is moral; Question on the economic and social costs and benefits associated with such a move.

Sample Answer (A)

Note: this kind of student gained high degrees for looking at the issue by multiple points of views, for taking a look at the benefits and costs to all major stakeholders, and for acknowledging that going productions international is a controversial topic.

Excellent use of information to support his or her claim.

1 . Whether or not Ohio Art Industry’s decision to shift creation offshore was ethically incorrect is a controversial topic. In strictly organization terms, Ohio Art Business (OAC) did not break any laws or perform a great illicit take action; OAC’s decision to just offshore was one that had nothing else options ” if the organization did not find ways to lower production costs, the company could have eventually removed bankrupt.

If production had not been shifted, OAC could have been unable to lower production costs, and will therefore struggle to generate enough profits to stay business. In any event, OAC employees would have suffered job deficits. Furthermore, OAC’s decision gained shareholders, which is one component of judging an ethical decision; there are no standards that prohibit off shoring. Yet , OAC’s requirements to their employees will be something that must be considered as very well. The company, which is perceived as children, should not only abandon the employees; it this sense, the company contains moral commitments and career practices which usually complicate problem of whether outsourcing techniques is ethical.

Sample Solution (B)

Note: This college student combined 1(a) and 1(b) but made it perfectly crystal clear. Again, the student considered the issue of integrity from multiple perspectives, and weighed the rewards and costs to various stakeholders and clearly defined what criteria (s)he followed.

1 . Problem asked is the one regarding social responsibilities of corporations. Even so, before making an ethical reasoning, one has to look at the decision coming from at least three points of views: economic, interpersonal and macro-level. On the one hand, it is possible to present a lot of economic rewards for both the ALL OF US and Cina. American buyers gained lower prices (an embrace wealth) and poor Chinese language villagers were able to move from the impoverished countryside and start a fresh life in cities[1]. Furthermore, Ohia Art did not go broke, which means that the company and its owners are still a source of earnings for the federal and state government.

Concerning social costs (here the social responsibility of an employer comes into discussion), the final of a manufacturing plant resulted in the collapse of the local community. Furthermore, 100 workers lost their particular jobs which number is definitely big whenever we take into account that Bryan has only 8, 1000 inhabitants. This sort of a execute of a organization can be considered a violation of ethical obligations springing in the position in the company. Nevertheless, the company would not make any kind of abrupt improvements. Moving out of Bryan was gradual and most workers were probably capable of finding new jobs[2]. In addition, even though the company does have cultural obligations, the Friedman Règle is at least partly relevant: a company must seek profits in order to endure. Summing up, in order for the choice to be ethical, the company should certainly seek revenue, but also minimise sociable and this is what Ohio Fine art surely performed.

Question 2: Whether it is honest for Kentkucky Art to continue employing Kinki

Answer A

Note: This kind of student acknowledges that there are a large number of ethical specifications, not all that lead to similar conclusion. S(he) clearly reveals how the same set of details can lead to divergent conclusions.

This issue can be analysed from multiple perspectives. From your cultural relativist point of view, the simple fact that the Chinese authorities switch a window blind eye to such procedures means that the company should do similar. According to the righteous moralist perspective, the company should desist working together because this would be making use of double criteria. The supporters of the naïve immoralist opinions would claim that since the Oriental businessmen have problems with property legal rights or keeping the RMB undervalued, western companies should not adhere to ethical standards in China. Nevertheless, because the view that human legal rights are undeniable rights of every human being has become widespread (judging on the number of NGOs and governments supporting such a view), it appears to be fair to imagine human rights are a standard of what constitutes organization ethics. Out of this follows that the Ohio Skill should abstain cooperating with Kin Ki, because the builder violates standard rights from the workers because enshrined in the United Nations General Declaration of Human Legal rights (e. g. the right to only and favourable remuneration).

Answer B

Note: Very thoughtful research that thinks the different monetary situations in different countries.

Assuming that the disappointing working conditions of Kin Ki personnel is true, it appears unethical for Ohio Skill Company to stay manufacturing with Kin Ki. Again the clear line between precisely what is ethical and acceptable is usually hazy. However , Ohio Fine art Company properly secured a contract on the grounds that employment procedures were suitable, and human rights had been enforced. The living conditions of Kin Ki employees are far from respectable living conditions ” employees will be exploited, job long hours, paid out below standard requirement, and live in impoverished conditions. In addition, it seems as if labor unions are implicitly banned (though not formally stated). The question of “how very much divergence is definitely acceptable between living conditions involving the U. H and Cina still is out there, however , it would appear that basic man living conditions will be being denied at Kin Ki. “”””””””

[1] In general, outsourcing appears to be a general pattern of globalisation. The trademark labour is among the greatest innovations of humankind and now it really is rapidly growing into the international area. Because the Ricardian model of transact predicts, the division of work will advantage all sides over the years [2] The other query is whether the corporation should provide their workers with a schooling so that they can get new careers, or if training programs should be financed by the express as in a Dutch-Danish flexicurity model. I would say that a company having economical problems (which is the reason for outsourcing) should not be forced to incur even more costs.

1

Tweet