Argument analysis applied to homeland security

Excerpt by Essay:

Privacy, Protection, Whistleblowing

[Surveillance is a important evil to avoid terrorist attacks from taking place. ]A [For example, the trick “PRISM” hard work saved Ny City’s subways from a 2009 terrorist plot led by a young Afghan-American, Najibullah Zazi. ]

A = Primary Argument

Cctv surveillance is a necessary evil to avoid terrorist problems

B sama dengan Level

The key PRISM work saved New York City’s subways in 2009 by a terrorist plot.

State B. can be Level you and facilitates Argument A, which is the primary argument.

[Surveillance violates the right to privacy by citizens throughout the world. ]A [Of course, residents already discharge their private data to federal government and companies alike, whether it be the duty office, well being services or banks. ]B [However, in all of the those cases, we can opt for ourselves which information is definitely shared, therefore our privateness is not violated, while the government cctv surveillance schemes clean up information without our explicit permission. ]C

C = Key Argument

Decide for ourselves what information to talk about + authorities surveillance sweeps without direct permission.

W = Level 1

Surveillance violates the right to privacy by citizens.

A = Level 1

Individuals release exclusive date to government and companies.

C is the main discussion. The main discussion shows that both Claim A and Declare B. arise independently concurrently. Neither Claim is dependent one the other side of the coin, neither Claim restricts or facilitates the other Claim. Consequently, both Promises are Level 1 .

[Surveillance on the scale revealed simply by Snowden should be stopped. ]A [Surveillance should be stopped as it can be abused by authorities to get back at its critics. ]W [Given the past track record of U. S. Government, this is simply not entirely unlikely. For example: ]C [Firstly, the department of Homeland Reliability did carry out in the past incorrect surveillance of protesters linked to Occupy Wall Street. ]M [Also, the Justice Department’s inspector general discovered that the F. B. My spouse and i. monitored a political group because of its anti-war views. ]E [Finally, a former C. My spouse and i. A. official says the fact that agency accumulated information about a prominent warfare critic in order to discredit him. ]Farrenheit [Then again, potential abuse could possibly stifle virtually any government effort. ]G

G sama dengan Level one particular

Potential misuse would probably stop government effort

B = Level you

Surveillance can be abused to get back for critics.

A = Key Argument

Cctv surveillance on the “Snowden scale” should be stopped.

C = Level 2

There is a government reputation abuse.

Farrenheit = Level 3

CIA gathered info to discredit a visible war vit.

E sama dengan Level a few

FBI supervised anti-war politics group.

D = Level 3

Inappropriate surveillance of Occupy protestors by HS.

There are 3 Level several Claims: Declare D, Assert E, and Claim Farreneheit. All three Level 3 Claims support the extent 2 Declare C. simply because provide an example of the more general Claim C. There are two Level two Claims: Assert B.

Tweet