In 400 BC, Hippocrates, a health care provider and a really acute observer, claimed that different persona types result from the balance of bodily ﬂuids. The conditions he created are still occasionally used today in talking about personality. Phlegmatic (or calm) people were thought to have a greater concentration of phlegm; sanguine (or optimistic) people experienced more blood vessels; melancholic (or depressed) persons had excessive levels of dark bile; and irritable persons had high levels of yellow-colored bile.
Hippocrates’ views regarding the biological basis of individuality are echoed in modern-day theories that link arsenic intoxication brain chemicals such as noradrenaline and serotonin to feelings and behaviour.
But how do we deﬁne ‘personality’? Within psychology two typical deﬁnitions are usually used:
Personality can be described as dynamic business, inside the person, of psychophysical systems that create the person’s attribute patterns of behaviour, feelings and thoughts. G. Watts. Allport, 1961 More or less stable, inside factors… make one individual’s behaviour steady from one time for you to another, and different from the behavior other people might manifest in comparable conditions.
The two deﬁnitions emphasize that persona is an indoor process that guides behavior. Gordon Allport (1961) makes the point that personality is definitely psychophysical, this means both physical and psychological. Recent studies have shown that biological and genetic trends do have an effect on character. Child (1968) makes the stage that character is stable – at least relatively stable. We do not transform dramatically from week to week
we can predict how our friends will certainly behave, and expect these to behave in a recognizably similar way from day to another. Child (1968) includes persistence (within an individual) and difference (between individuals) in the deﬁnition, and Allport (1961) refers to attribute patterns of behaviour inside an individual. They are also important things to consider. So individuality is what makes the actions, feelings and thoughts consistent (or relatively consistent), and it is as well what makes all of us different from one other.
PSYCHOANALYTIC HYPOTHESES –
FREUD AND BEYOND
By the our childhood of the twentieth century, Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) acquired begun to publish about psychoanalysis, which he described as ‘a theory from the mind or personality, a method of investigation of unconscious process, and a procedure for treatment’ (1923/62).
Central to a psychoanalytic
unconscious mental processes proapproach is the concept of cesses inside the mind that individuals are not unconscious mental processes normally aware of
– the idea that unconscious motivations and needs have a role in determining our conduct. This approach also emphasizes the irrational facets of human actions and shows aggressive and sexual demands as creating a major effect on personality.
Just how do personality advocates deﬁne persona?
Why are both persistence and big difference important concepts for the personality psychologist? Why is the unconscious essential in Freud’s theory of personality? About what ways would Freud link personality expansion to physical development? According to Eysenck, what are the three primary proportions of persona? What are the best Five?
What is more important in determining behaviour – anybody or the condition? Is extraversion related to brain-wave activity?
Are similar (monozygotic) twins more comparable in character than non-identical (dizygotic) mixed twins? Is each of our personality an impact of how we all interpret the earth, or does it cause that? Does the method we perceive stress figure out how we manage it? How can internalized specifications affect each of our behaviour?
EVEN MORE READING
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, Meters. F. (1996). Perspectives in Personality. 3 rd edn. Needham Heights, MOTHER: Allyn and Bacon. Divides personality into different points of views and features a considerable amount of materials on self-regulation. Mischel, Watts. (1999). Summary of Personality. 6th edn. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. A fascinating introduction to individuality research.
Pervin, L. A. (1996). The Science of Individuality. New York: Ruben Wiley & Sons. A readable and reasonably comprehensive account of individuality research. Peterson, C., Maier, S. Farrenheit., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1993). Learned Confusion: A Theory for age Personal Control. New York: Oxford University Press.
The history and development of discovered helplessness theory.
Plomin, R. (1994). Genetics and Experience: The Interplay Among Nature and Nurture. London, uk: Sage. Looks at the function of both equally nature and nurture inside the
progress individual differences. Plomin, 3rd there�s r., DeFries, T. C., McClearn, G. Electronic., & Rutter, M. (1997). Behavioral Genes. 3rd edn. New York: Freeman. Introduces the ﬁeld of behavioural inherited genes, including hereditary factors in ability and disability, personality and psychopathology. Contributing publisher:
Diane Meters. Houston
PSY_C14. qxd 1/2/05 3: 42 pm Web page 313