Carl jung s archetypes essay

Abstract Carl Jung was your illegitimate boy of a poet. Jung’s psychological voyage in the psychological unfamiliar began early on in his life; he became aware of two separate areas of his Self. This encounter drew him into the discipline of psychiatry, dealing with very subjective phenomena. Following relationship shock, with Freud, Jung began a dangerous and painful trip into the subconscious, he conveyed and named his archetypes, possible alternative personalities. This kind of experience brought Jung to a new perception of individualization; this would be the birth of his theory that the mind include conscious and unconscious amounts.

Indentifying the potential source of the various Archetypes or mental disorders that haunted Jung’s in his efforts, will be the aim of this exploration paper. Carl Jung’s Collective Unconscious Archetypes Jana T. Lucas, Liberty University Carl Jung was born the illegitimate son of your German poet person. Jung was always, a great emotional and sensitive child, (Feist & Feist, s. 99). Before the age of five Jung commenced differentiating among two various aspects of his personality, which usually he defined as No .

1 & No . installment payments on your Jung presumed that Number 2 was an old deceased man, (reincarnation concept), (Jung, 1961, g. 68). Jung wrote that No .

1 personality, appeared more dominating and steadily repressed intuitive premonitions brought on by the useless old man, referred to as personality No . 1 . Jung’s professional curiosity were in archeology, (Feist & Feist p. 100), but because of his personal mental experiences in the unknown, his curiosity received him more into the normal and religious sciences than that of psychology. Jung’s protector family freely professed and practiced inside the field of occult sensation, this curious Jung enough to explore individuals avenues expertly. All these contributing factors led Jung to pick a profession in Psychiatry.

Jung was especially interested in this kind of field as a result of relationship psychiatry has within the subjective phenomena (Singer, 1994, Feist & Feist, g. 100).

Carl Jung became mesmerized with Freud, a relationship started that would include long- long lasting and serious emotional significance on Jung. According to Feist & Feist, Freud identified with Jung being a potential, competent successor (Feist & Feist, p. 101), Jung viewed Freud in a more intimate method, leaving him crushed when the relationship finished due to professional indifferences and potentially ethnicity charged associations initiated by Jung, according to Bergmann.

In the words of Bergmann, “The fact that Freud failed to understand, was generalized by simply Jung in the theory that Jews are not able to understand the Aryan mentality. In terms of Freud is concerned, it appeared that this individual succeeded in assisting to bring about his most severe nightmare. Freud had grand anticipation that Jung will succeed him as president of the Worldwide because he planned to avoid labels psychoanalysis a Jewish remedy (Bergmann, p. 252). In the words of Feist, (McGuire, 1974, l. 95) Jung wrote to Freud and confessed his “crush, using undeniable, sensual undertones.

Jung further described that this individual believed these feelings as the result of sexual abuse he had endured being a teen, by simply someone Jung had loved and dependable. For the next a few years Jung might slip into a situation of major depression, described simply by Marvin Goldwert (1992) as a period of time he would he choose to identify like a “creative illness, this knowledge would have Jung throughout the underground of his individual unconscious mind (Feist & Feist, l. 102).

Even though dangerous and painful, the method would have Jung to a place in which he would be able to become acquainted with his own unconscious and demons that hauntedhim since childhood, that he would not understand (Feist & Feist, P. 103). Prolonged experience in this mental state could enabled Jung to explore deeper into the unconscious, these claims could have been interpreted in today’s specifications as a potential form of Self-hypnosis. The psychological states that Jung proven were symptomatic of manners that are typically identified with all the state of hypnosis.

Jung claimed to work with this process as a method to explore his collective subconscious. In the words and phrases of Tressoldi and Prete, “self hypnosis is seen as a self or outside inspired instructions to leave your body and allow your head togo to the place the place that the target was presented, this is exactly what Jung was attempting to attain when he started to be aware of the archetypes, (alternate personalities), (Jung 1961). Jung termed this personal mental inner voyage as “the process of division (Feist & Feist s. 106).

Jung believed this type of personality success of “individualization, was found in the group unconscious and made up the deep structures in the psyche, “Archetypes, (alternate personalities) are overpowered, oppressed in the collective unconscious, and are thebuilding prevents behind an individual’s religious and mythological perception system, they are the basis of the thinking operations (Feist & Feist, l. 104).

The cause of these archetype entities would be a controversial topic within the groups of Theorist throughout period, each has become relabeled, inhibited, accepted and revoked quite a few times due to Jung’s lack of investigative research (Feist & Feist, s. 23), his theories will be based mostly on personal experiences.

Jung believed there have been many archetypes, and they dwelled within the collective unconscious, of all people. Jung’s theory is that archetypes happen to be theproduct of ancient or perhaps archaic pictures accumulated coming from past and present life experience, (Feist & Feist, p. 106). Jung place himself in an mental state that resembled a form of depressive disorder or could possibly be thought of as a type of self-hypnosis, as mentioned earlier. A few believe this was in hard work to cope with his unresolved psychological issues that haunted him as childhood. Jung referred to this state as “living inside the collective unconscious, or “creative illness, (McIntosh, p. 136).

Theorist including Bakhtin known it as the “boundaries of consciousness, both Jung andMcIntosh is likely to refer to the state as “emergent consciousness, because that could only enter into existence because space between self and the other (McIntosh, p. 140). In the words of Feist, “The personal unconscious sees all overpowered, oppressed, forgotten, or perhaps subliminally perceived experiences of just one particular individual. (Feist & Feist, l. 104)

Each of the experiences being a baby, which include impulses and inherited activities are kept in the personal unconscious and are one of a kind to each individual. The primary component of the personal unconscious was branded by Jung as things. (Jung, 1931/1960b). Jung assumed not all theseemotions and concepts were completely conscious, yet partly stemmed from the collective unconscious (Feist & Feist, p. 104).

According to McIntosh, “Jung thought the function in the unconscious is to construct compensatory, perspectives towards the biases that will be held by consciousness, including partial or perhaps defective perceptions. The aim of this technique is in the end the division of the spirit in relation to the self. What is repressed, ignored or neglected by the mindful is paid out for by unconscious, in fact it is the opportunity that this will provide towards the integration of the psyche that is sought through it. (McIntosh, p.

136). Jung thought the communautaire unconscious accocunts for the profound structures from the psyche, “Archetypes, are repressed in the collective unconscious, and therefore are the building blocks behind an individual’s religious and mythological belief system, these are the basis of our pondering processes (Feist & Feist, p. 104). Archetypes think within the group unconscious, and are the product of ancient or archaic images accumulated from past and present lifestyle experiences, (I. e. handed down ancestry reincarnated experiences) (Feist & Feist, p. 106).

Jean Knox describes Jung’s alternate personalities or organizations as, “Archetypes are oftenthought of because pre-formed inborn packets of images and dream waiting to pop out like butterflies from a chrysalis given the best environmental trigger (Knox, J. 2004, pg. 3). Sabrina. Speilrein, referred to archetypes while the setting of intelligence found in dreams, myths, and fairytales, as well as the delusional thinking about schizophrenics (Skea, B. 2006. Pg. 535).

Brian Skea described archetypes as an island of unconscious thoughts and emotions remerging from a sea of consciousness as symbols. (Feist & Feist, 2009, s. 112), archetypes became Jung’s emotional and social replacement for the lost camaraderie this individual hadwith Freud. These different personalities helped Jung cope with his tremendous grief.

Jung suffered a devastating, personal, cultural dilemma once his attached to admiration for Freud ended. Jung’s childhood was rattled with emotional concerns, from introversion, neglect via his mother to identify dilemma. According to Feist, Jung was searching what he thought to be the ultimate conclusion, the archetypes of all archetypes the “self(Feist & Feist, p. 111).

Studies of families created by the American Sociological Review, show “schizophrenic children offer empirical explanations of the underlying reactive orientation in thecontext of parent and child contact, i. e., where the requirement is associated with the inner psychological condition of a person captured in the conflicting streams of supportive surface and rejecting substructure (Etziono,. 881). Matn Bergmann wrote, “Winnicott detected, Jung’s the child years schizophrenia, additionally, it appeared that Jung stated paranoid attitude towards Freudian psychoanalysis.

In the words of Brian Feldman, “Jung applied his theories to stabilize his personality after the crucial period of his ‘confrontation with the unconscious’ which occurred pursuing his break with Freud. Junghad problems confronting thing loss and a sense of desertion by his mother, in the event you focus on the aspects of Jung’s personality which can be ‘typical of psychosis and psychotic character (Feldman, g. 256). In accordance to Bergman, Jung got many spiritual issues that were unresolved (Bergman, p. 362).

Jung’s identification with Our god and contact with the occult created limitations that Jung was not able to clarify nor hurdle. Jung was an extremist, placed that chaos is religious beliefs that has not as yet understood by itself, that person is essentially spiritual, which is displayed by the anthropological fact that all knowncultures add a belief in God or perhaps gods (Bergman, p. 361).

It is only modern aberrant “urban”man, according to Jung, that has departed out of this and provides paid the price in uncontrolled mental disorders and dislocation. For the concept of God, to use Jung’s terms, is a central archetype in our collective unconscious; hence trying to deny it really is like planning to deny it truly is like looking to deny we human beings required a parent (Bergman, p. 361). Freud and Jung did not share a similar belief program when it came to religious beliefs, rued was very hesitant, according to Bergman. Actually through their very own differences, Freud still placed Jung in high consider.

In Bergmann’s words, inch I believe that if Freud ever examine what Jung said regarding Freudian psychoanalysis after 1914, it would have got caused him a great deal of pain. (Bergmann, p. 52). Jung appeared to be concealing from his issues simply by escaping into his subconscious, according to Bandura, those who avoid risk or have low self-efficacy values will probably live in their outdated pattern of thinking and behaving for a long time (Bandura, 1997). In the words and phrases of Pinquart and Silbereisen, Jung’s specific resources (such as self-efficacy; Bandura, 1997).

And the understanding that confidants, such as friends and family, support or perhaps toleratenew habits of considering and acting (Myers & Booth, 2002), have an impact in whether one grasps fresh opportunities or falls in depressive or emotionally dangerous behaviors (Pinquart & Silbereisen, p. 294). Jung experienced no one that can help him through his turmoil, this individual and his companion, Freud experienced parted ways. No one otherwise really may understand upon Jung’s intellectual level what he was dealing with emotionally. As a coping system, Jung escaped into a great emotional abyss, this is where this individual found his inner beings, we call archetypes.

Relating to Feist, Jung related personally to eight archetypes as icons, the personality, shadow, anima, animus, the Great Mother, the Wise Old Man, the Main character, and the Self. Jung every archetype held a particular situation and had a specific function inside the personality and/or forming in the personality, throughout lifespan. Jung identified them as “players in the framing process of the personality (Feist & Fesit, p. 106 -112). Jung identified the persona while his initially Archetype, he would describe this inner trip as “the process of individuation.

According to Doran, Jung wrote “the process of turning into one’s own self, individuation means turning into an ‘individual, ‘ and, insofar because ‘individuality’ embracesour innermost previous and matchless uniqueness, additionally, it implies becoming one’s very own self “(Doran R. Jung, Gnosis).

The archetype known as the “self started to be a key image in Jung’s archetype theory and carefully related to his most powerful personal religious knowledge. Jung specifies the Personal as “the totality from the personality, our life’s goal, the centre and area of the complete psyche taking on consciousness plus the unconscious, and supra ordinate to the mindful ego (1916/1928, pars. 274, 404; 1944, par. forty-four; 1963, s. 417).

‘There is little hope of our ever having the ability to reach possibly approximate awareness of the Home. (Schlamm, l. 410) Schalamm wrote that towards the end of Jung’s life this individual declared the fact that experience of the Self taken with it a luminosity of these kinds of intensity that this could be compared to the experience of being ‘anchored in God’ (Jung, 1976, p. 371), (Schlamm, s. 410).

Jung believed that self-realization was reached like a final part of growth and maturity, and never all would achieve this enlightened state of accomplishment (Feist & Feist, p. 111)). Yet this is an individual that did not reach that enlightened stage within just his very own perception. Jung associated with 8-10 various personalities, archetypes, inside his own mind, this may be symptomatic ofpotential Dissociative Disorder, (DD), containing also been connected with religious ownership.

According to Rosik, DD patients claims to distinguish demons from alter egos (archetypes), based on the subjective a conclusion of seglar and faith based observers, every rooted in different worldviews (Rosik, p. 114). Religious or perhaps spiritual ownership has been inhibited as a possible substitute for the “alter ego’s expressed and recognized by Jung (Singleton, l. 178), “Experiences of wicked are generally regarded as counters with evil spirits, which possess special powers, identified by name and act against humans. (i. e. Legion in the Bible).

This is suggests how Jung described his alter ego’s known as “archetypes. The theory of possession seems unlikely to get a man of Jung’s opinion in The almighty. The description of Jung’s inner journey and studies of “alter ego’s are more descriptive of emotional uncertainty, rather than that identified with spiritual control. In Bowman’s word, “DD (Dissociative Disorder) is not a spiritual disorder, but a mental disorder that requires Psychological treatment. Exorcism is known as a spiritual treatment that does not fit in in the remedying of psychiatric disorders, DD included (Rosik, l. 114).

Bowman believed delayed memories of childhood trauma, (i. e. Jung’s lovemaking abuse determined later in life), played a key function in DD and/or MPD. (Bowman, s. 232-243). Jung identified 8 distinct archetypes symbols, DID/MPD have understanding features, which might be in close comparison to Jung’s archetypes. Symptoms of DD and MPD are defined as “the existence within the individuals who expresses two or more distinct personas, each which is prominent at a particular time (American Psychiatric Affiliation, 1980.. 257).

According to Phelps you will discover over fifty definitions of personality; the majority of refer to internalvariables that for some reason cause a individual’s behavior yet do not refer to personality to be behavior (Phelps, p. 237). In contrast, Eysenck (1959) mentioned his situation as “Personality as the sum total of actual or potential habit patterns of the person, since determined by genetics and environment.

Ironically, Feist describes Jung’s “Wise Old fart Archetype in the same manner (Feist & Feist, g. 110) Skinner (1953) asserted that individuality represent “topographical subdivisions of behavior. ‘As we know by Jung’s relationship experiments, particularité signify processes. Behind personal complexes, we might find an archetypal “system of readiness foraction’. (Zabriski, g. 36).

As Jung referred to that a slip of the tongue, a recollection lapse are simply just unconscious phenomenon that typically emerges in the unconscious, along the way of “individualization As we have previously stated, ‘Jung’s method of learning archetypes does not employ a great experimental technique’ (Shelburne 1988, pp. thirty-three, 122). ‘The transference phenomenon is certainly one of the most important syndromes on the process of individualization’. (Jung, para. 539 Jung identified archetypes a way to organize emotions accountable for the formation and reaction

to external concerns, that created internal practices within the human psyche. Going through the options that Jung’s archetypes were a result of mystical possession, transference, multiple personality disorder or various other emotional disorders as a result of a traumatic and introverted the child years experiences as a result of sexual mistreatment. The start depressive habit initiated by the termination with the relationship among Freud and Jung, resulting in the potential means of utilizing self- hypnosis while form of get away, which led to the connection and discovery of the many archetypes that Jung describes in the theory of personality expansion as symbols.

According to Feist & Feist, Jung claimed that everyone has various archetypes, that they serve individual functions and come from exceptional experiences individuals. The knowning that Jung’s archetypes were basically use of icons, seems to be a shared theory. ‘Symbolic form’ denotes a symbolic appearance in its most extensive meaning: the expression of ‘mental’ material through perceptual ‘signs’ and ‘images’. The important question concerning these forms is whether they are in all of the their kinds of possible applications based on a single fundamental principle (Pietikainer, g. 331).

Studies don’t identify why Jung used icons to identify, classify and affiliate with these kinds of unexplained icons within the ordinaire unconscious, called archetypes. First he divided the mind into three parts, the ego getting the most mindful. Jung believed memories were the items of the unconscious. The communautaire unconscious is where the archetypes were kept. Archetypes, relating to Jung were basically inherited thoughts, such as how you can love, connection and respond in certain situations, automatic, integrated reactions.

According to Doctor George Boeree, ‘The contents of the ordinaire unconscious are called archetypes. Jung also called themdominants, imagos, mythological or esencial images, and a few other names’ (Boeree, 1997). According to Jung the Mother archetype symbol presents nurturing and “mothering. The symbol with the Shadow that Jung uses is associated with the irony of the spirit, the evil we own, but don’t admit.

The persona may be the image that the public see’s, not our true personal, how we need others to watch us. The Anima and Animus will be part of our persona, alma is the girl aspect present in the ordinaire unconscious of men, and the animus is a male factor present in the collective unconscious of women. Jung’s theory engaged many family members archetypes.

The father, symbolized as an specialist figure, the child archetype presents the future, becoming, rebirth, and salvation. Archetypes represent story characters including the hero, and the maiden. In Jung’s theory the hero is well guided by the sensible old man. He’s a form of the animus, and reveals for the hero the size of the ordinaire unconscious. There may be an animal archetype that represents humanity’s human relationships with the pet world, character verses nurture.

According to Jung there are many archetypes in every person, you can never reach “individualization until you have encountered all of them personally through some form of emotionalexperience. Ironically, Jung admitted that individuals can never be able to know what the archetypes actually are, and even through his profound efforts to clarify them, they are nothing but pretty much successful translations from one metaphorical language to a different (Jung 1949, para. 271).

This assertion of Jung is to some degree self-defeating, whenever we conceive study regarding archetypes from a technological prospective. Jung seemed to are in a world of animation, a world of creation of his own producing.

Although, he was a great observer of human nature, he offered no empirical or experimentalevidence that could present proof that his hypotheses were falsifiable and viable. In Conclusion: In light of Jung’s belief that every people possess numerous alter ego’s, generally known as archetypes, must be denied.

In order to subscribe to this kind of theory should be to suggest that the majority of the population is usually mentally sick to some degree, subject to hallucinations and/or delusions such as Jung knowledgeable in his personal, self induced hypnotic says, known as “creative illnesses. A subscription to Carl Jung’s idea system simply, would be to subscribe to it as a whole, and that would include “denying our inborn archetype as God (Bergmann 361).

Because of many views and observations, the archetype may just be the human mindful in its older and moralistic state. A great emotionally healthier person should have the premonition and emotional intelligence to second guesses their actions and decisions. These decisions aren’t based on voices and conversations of innate “alter ego’s and beings, that dwell inside our collective subconscious, but from your personal character traits and moral philosophy that we acquire and choose in life, by choice and exposure, equally good and bad. We all did not get these reactions, we discovered these reactions and were given “free will to accept or perhaps deny these people.

Instincts alternatively is inherited traits, the instinct to outlive, adapt, like and the human need to be social are all Our god given attributes, even Hersker had these traits and he had zero human ancestors’ to get such attributes or intuition. References American Psychiatric Connection (APA). Analysis and statistical manual of mental disorders. First release, 1952; Second edition, 1968; Third edition, 1980; revised, 1987; Fourth edition, year 1994;. Washington D. C. Bakhtin, M. (1981). Dialogical Creativity. Trans. Meters. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press. (1984). Complications of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis:

University of Minnesota Press. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bergman, David, (2006). Spiritual Madness, Log of Religion and Health, Vol. 45, No . 3, Fall season 2006). DOI: 10. 1007/s10943-006-9033-x. Retrieved coming from Liberty School Library, Hottest Academic Search, 06/28/09 EBSCOhost database Bergmann, M. H. (2008).

Freud/Jung: Enlightenment/ Romanticism, And The Illogical, Issues In Psychoanalytic Psychology Vol. 40, No . one particular, 2008 Freud/Jung: Enlightenment/ Romanticism, New York: Columbia University Press. (1998). The Conflict Among Enlightenment and Romantic Philosophiesas Reflected inside the History of Psychoanalysis. Lecture towards the Berlin Psychoanalytic Society.

Recovered from Freedom University Catalogue, Premiere Academics Search, 05/29/09. EBSCOhost repository. Blackman, T. (1996). The Oxford Dictionary of Viewpoint. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boeree, George C. (1997) The Basic Articles of C. C. Jung. Copyright 1997, 2006 C. George http://webspace. ship. edu/cgboer/jung. html Bowman, E. H. (1996b). Delayed memories of kid abuse; Portion II: A summary of research findings relevant to understanding all their reliability and suggestibility. Dissociation, 9, 232-243. Doran, Ur.

(1993, fall 93). Jung, gnosis, and faith rejected. Cross Currents, 43(3), and 307. Gathered from Liberty University Library, Premiere Educational Search 06/21/09 EBSCOhost data source. Erzioni, A. (1968). Fundamental Human Demands, Alienation and Inauthenticity: American Sociological Assessment, Columbia College or university. P. 881 Retrieved by Liberty School Library, Hottest Academic Search 06/19/09 EBSCOhost database. Feist, Gregory & Feist, Jess, (2009). Ideas of Individuality: Jung: Synthetic Psychology. (7th ed. )

New York: McGraw-Hill Feldman, Brian. (1992) Jung’s Infancy and Childhood as well as influence after theDevelopment of Analytical Mindset, Journal of Analytical Psychology Palo Descanso, California. 261 Ford, Kathleen Carey (2004). Portrait of your Lady: Mary, Piero, plus the Great Mother Archetype. Diary of Religion and Health, Volume 43, No .

2 . Retrieved from Liberty University Collection, Premiere Educational Search 06/21/09 EBSCOhost database. Knox, Blue jean. (2004). From archetypes to reflective function: Journal of Analytical Psychology, 0021″8774/2004/4901/, 1-19. Retrieved by Liberty University or college Library, Hottest Academic Search, 05/18/09. EBSCOhost database.

McIntosh, P. (2008) Reflective duplication: a figurative approach to highlighting in, about, and about actions: Journal of Educational Actions Research, Volume. 16, No . 1 . March (2008) ISSN 0965-0792 ISSN 1747-5074 DOI: 10. 1080/09650790701833162. School of Inter-professional Studies, University Campus Suffolk, Ipswich, UK, Recovered from Liberty University Collection, Premiere Academic Search 06/02/09 EBSCOhost data source. Phelps, Brian, J. (2000). Dissociative Personality Disorder: The Relevance of Behavior Evaluation. Behavior and Disassociation. The Psychological Record, 50, 235-249. South Dakota State College or university.

Retrieved from Liberty University Library, Premiere Academic Search 06/26/09. EBSCOhost database. Petteri Pietikainen, Petteri. (1998) Archetypes as representational forms: Journal of Synthetic Psychology. 0021″8774/98/4303/325: 1998, 43, 325- 343. The World of Synthetic Psychology, Vantaa, Finland, Printed by Blackwell Publishers Limited, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 350 Primary Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.. Recovered from Liberty University Collection, Premiere Academic Search 05/21/09. EBSCOhost repository. Pinquart, Matn & Rainer K. Silbereisen, (2004).

Man development in times of socialChange, Theoretical considerations and research needs. The Foreign Society for the Study of Behavioral Development. Foreign Journal of Behavioral Creation, DOI: 12. 1080/01650250344000406, College or university of Jena, Germany. P. 28 (4), 289″298. Retrieved from Freedom University Collection, Premiere Educational Search 06/26/09. EBSCOhost data source. http://www. tandf. co. uk/journals/pp/01650254. html Schlamm, L. (2007) C. G. Jung and numinous encounter:

Between the known and the unknown: Religious Research, School of European Culture and Languages, European Log of Psychotherapy and Guidance, December 2007; 9(4): 403″414. Canterbury, UK. Retrieved by Liberty University or college Library, Hottest Academic Search 06/26/09. EBSCOhost database. Skea, Brian R. (2006). Sabina Spielrein: Out of your shadow of Jung and Freud. Diary of Deductive Psychology, C51, 527″552. Retrieved from Freedom University Selection, Premiere Academic Search 05/16/09. EBSCOhost repository. Singleton, Andrew (2001).

Simply no Sympathy pertaining to the Devil: Narratives about Wicked; Encountering satan. Journal of recent Religion, Vol. 16, No . 2, 2001, ISSN 1353″7903 print/ISSN 1469-9419 on-line/01/020177-15 O 2001 The singer & Francis Ltd, DOI: 10. 1080/13537900120040654.

Page 178. Retrieved via Liberty College or university Library, Premiere Academic Search 06/22/09. EBSCOhost database. Tressoldi, P & Guido Del Prete (2005). ESP beneath Hypnosis: The Role of Induction Guidelines and Personality Characteristics. Stanford & Stein’s, 1994 meta-analysis. Retrieved via Liberty University or college Library, Premiere Academic Search 06/26/09.

EBSCOhost database. Downtown, Elizabeth, (2005). Fordham, Jung and the personal: a re-examination of Fordham’s contribution to Jung’s conceptualization of the home. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 50, 571″594 0021″8774/2005/5005/571 2005, The Society ofAnalytical Psychology. Released by Blackwell Publishing Limited, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford. Retrieved upon June 1, 2009 from your EBSCOhost data source.

Winnicott, G. W. (1964). ‘Review of Memories, Dreams, Reflections’ in Psychoanalytic Explorations. Cambridge, MUM. Harvard School Press, 1989. 273-274 Zabriskie, Beverly G. (1997). Thawing the ‘frozen accidents’: the archetypal perspective in countertop transference: Archetypes ad Accidents: Journal of Analytical Mindset, New York, 42, 25-40, Retrieved from Liberty University Collection, Premiere Educational Search 06/26/09. EBSCOhost data source.

1

Tweet