Associated with Alexandria – Time Series Data
Tufte (2001) and other ambassadors of the visual screen of data have shown us just how easily you should understand complicated data in the next graphically displayed in ways that our minds are created to understand. Tufte argues that “experience while using analysis of datais essential for achieving precision and grace inside the presence of statistics,. although even book of visual design happen to be silent about how to think about numbers” (Tufte, 2001, p. 104). Tufke feedback, that “Illustrators too often discover their work as an entirely artistic organization – the text “creative, inch “concept, ” and “style” combine regularly in all possible permutations – a Big Believe jargon for the small job of making a time-series a few data points long” (Tufte, 2001, p. 204). Visual screen of data has other uses than simply a classy way to look at, appreciate, and analyze data. The process of concluding a visual display of information forces a defieicency of data ethics and completing data units. When data is absent in a image display, it can be glaringly obvious. And the procedure for figuring out how you can arrange info for best display generates an awareness of the assumptions that undergird the data collection – and ultimately, the information analysis. When building a visual screen of data, the analyst provides cause to “muse around the ineffable beginnings ofinsights” (Gladwell, 2007, g. 40). The analyst admits, if only secretly, that “There are eight different things it could mean – all of those will be possibilities. You can’t just take a look at one patterns [or data point] in isolation” (Gladwell, 2007, g. 43). If the data merely doesn’t add up, we might excel to recollect Averch’s caveat, that “If we believe that the information to be gained simply by evaluation should be proportional for the decision makers’ needs, period, budget, and attention, after that conventional quantitative evaluations may be infeasible or perhaps inappropriate” (n. d., p. 292).
Indicator # 20 Median low rent
Indication Response #4 – Representing Variance in Time (2000 – 2010)
Simply by 2010, 18. 8 million renters got at average housing expense burdens. The numbers climbed in 2008-2009 by 1 . 2 mil, which is almost twice the rise in 2007 – 8.
More than 69% of the enhance was among households paying more than half their very own incomes to get housing. The number of severely burdened renters last season was the largest annual boost over many years.
Source: America’s Rental Casing: Meeting Challenges, Building on Opportunities
The Joint Centre for Enclosure Studies at Harvard School.
Note: This report contains a plethora of visual data, however , non-e could be copied from your PDF and would require replication and permission to replicate http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/publications/rental/rh11_americas_rental_housing/AHR2011-5-Affordability.pdf
Visual Representation of Indication #4
Sign Reponse #5 – Which represents Variance on time (Cross-Sectional Data)
For minimum-wage workers, using the 1/3 of earned income standard, an affordable monthly hire is just $377. Many households that hire units have got incomes very well below that level, like the working poor and those living on fixed incomes. The full-time minimum-wage equivalent can be $14, 500. About .25 of all renters and about 1/2 of all tenants who get assistance possess household incomes below that figure. Last year, most assisted units hired for less than $600. Thirty-five percent rented for under $400 regarding 20% got rents in the range somewhere within those two figures. In rental units where tenets did not receive assistance, in comparison, only 31% rented at under $600 and 8% hired for less than $400.
Source: America’s Rental Real estate: Meeting Issues, Building upon Opportunities
The Joint Middle for Enclosure Studies by Harvard University or college.
Note: This kind of report includes a plethora of image data, yet , none may be copied through the PDF and would require replication and permission to replicate.
http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/publications/rental/rh11_americas_rental_housing/AHR2011-5-Affordability.pdf
Visual Rendering of Sign #5
Income Standard
Equivalent Annual Income
Cost-effective Monthly Hire
Supportable Per/Unit Development Price
Income to cover Unit
$51, 800
$1, 300
$110, 000
Typical Renter Profits
$30, five-hundred
$760
$64, 800
Full-Time Minimum Salary Equivalent
$14, 500
$360
$30, 800
Source: America’s Rental Enclosure: Meeting Challenges, Building about Opportunities
JCHS calculations applying data from U. T. Census Bureau, 2009 and 2010 Studies of Industry Absorption and 2009 American Community Survey.
Note: This report includes a plethora of visual data, however , non-e can be copied from the PDF and would require replication and permission to replicate.
Indication #22 Number of foreclosures
Indication Response #4 – Symbolizing Variance on time (2000 – 2010)
The 2009 foreclosure data from RealtyTrac indicates a rise year over year of 47% of national home foreclosure rates. Property foreclosure rates are reported to have leveled away in Q2 and Q3 2009. Although economists anticipate a surge inside the coming months as the breakdowns inside the foreclosure techniques are tackled. Also, adjustable-rate mortgages happen to be due to reset, a hypostatic proportion that are loans that do certainly not require borrowers’ income confirmation.
Visual Portrayal of Indication #4
Physique 2 . Rank foreclosures Throughout the States
Point out
Total real estate foreclosures
1 property foreclosure per # of homes
% change from Feb 3 years ago
% vary from March 06\
Nevada
some, 738
up to 29. 42
Colorado
6, 267
18. 02
16. twenty three
California
23, 434
thirty-five. 49
Atlanta
6, 769
-7. two
-11. 59
Arizona
four, 476
43. 65
The state of michigan
8, 610
-7. 5
11. 43
Florida
18, 303
-25. 29
54. 08
Kansas
8, 222
9. 95
74. 3
Indiana
4, 332
26
-12. 18
Illinois
several, 819
18. 08
seventy. 27
The state of texas
12, 755
2 . 98
6. 73
New Jersey
four, 780
-4. 53
twenty eight. 91
Massachusetts
3, 497
39. 99
Tennessee
a few, 178
-17. 15
-6. 53
Connecticut
1, 517
2 . 99
83. 21 years old
Missouri
2, 494
your five. 77
70. 59
New york
3, 241
1, 086
-3. 71
56. 34
Utah
you, 208
-25
-55. seventy four
Oklahoma
one particular, 138
1, 313
-18. 25
-16. 69
Washington
1, 736
1, 378
7. 16
-5. eighty six
Rhode Island
1, 392
15700. 00*
Idaho
one particular, 481
21 years old. 16
66. 67
Philadelphia
2, 921
1, 797
47. 82
-20. 69
Oregon
1, 949
a few. 03
twenty-eight. 13
Nebraska
2, 013
21. 43
New York
three or more, 711
two, 069
-18. 48
-7. 11
Ak
98
two, 094
20. 99
-3. 92
Iowa
2, 125
-2. thirty eight
Maryland
2, 220
Illinois
2, 323
-61. 86
-60. 16
New South america
2, 394
-32. 08
27. 84
Delaware
two, 399
The state of alabama
2, 436
79. 51
Kentucky
two, 501
10. 46
Kansas
2, 523
5. 67
Minnesota
two, 559
-13. 02
forty-four. 54
Va
1, 054
2, 738
46. almost eight
Wisconsin
a couple of, 785
-15. 09
67. 75
Louisiana
3, 252
-24. 51
Montana
a few, 522
18
-16. 43
New Hampshire
4, 757
South Carolina
your five, 155
-1. 16
-55. 67
Beautiful hawaii
65
several, 085
10. 17
forty-four. 44
Western Virginia
95
8, 891
26. 67
Maine
sixty-five
10, 029
South Dakota
32
15, 100
forty-five. 45
thirty-three. 33
North Dakota
twenty four
12, 070
33. thirty-three
14. 29
Mississippi
94
13, 498
-34. 72
28. 77
Wyoming
12
22, 385
-66. 67
-67. seventy four
District of Columbia
your five
54, 969
-61. fifty four
Vermont
you
294, 382
0
-80
U. T.
149, 150
6. 6th
46. seventy eight
*Actual maximize may not be as high as a result of expanded info coverage.
Signal Response #5 – Symbolizing Variance (Cross-Sectional Data)
The ongoing foreclosure catastrophe is expected to encourage development in the quantity of renter homeowners as ex – owners go for renting. Single family home house foreclosures will also add a steady movement of products to the local rental market. The ability of renter households to occupy these homes will be an important factor in maintaining the stability of distressed local communities hard strike by the property foreclosure crisis.
Visible Representation of Indicator #5
Figure several. Trends Every Foreclosure: Boston, MA; Alexandria, VA; S . fransisco, CA
Supply: RealtyTrac
http://www.realtytrac.com//propertydetails/popuptrendtool.aspx?TrendToolType=GEFPComparisonID=DefaultZipCode=CAreferrer=TrendCenter
Indicator Reponse #5 – Representing Variance in Time (Cross-Sectional Data)
Physique 4. Physical Comparison Alexandria City, Condition of Virginia, National
Source: RealtyTrac
http://www.realtytrac.com//propertydetails/popuptrendtool.aspx?TrendToolType=GEFPComparisonID=DefaultZipCode=CAreferrer=TrendCenter
Indicator Reponse #5 – Representing Variance in Time (Cross-Sectional Data)
Indication #39 Quantity of new, affordable rental products in conjunction with new developments
Indication Response #4 – Which represents Variance on time (2000 – 2010)
The State of Virginia uses the HUD data, stats or method for determining Express programs. Parameters are based on Reasonable Market Rent, Public Enclosure units, local rental assistance discount vouchers, or low income vouchers.
Housing Affordability Data Program. The Real estate Affordability Info System (HADS) is a group of files created from the 1985 and later national American Casing Survey (AHS) and the 2002 and later Local area AHS. This method categorizes enclosure units by simply affordability and households by simply income, according to Adjusted Median Income, Good Market Rent (FMR), and poverty cash flow. It also contains housing expense burden to get owner and renter homeowners. These files have been the foundation for the worst circumstance needs dining tables since 2001. The data documents are available for general public use, simply because were derived from AHS open public use documents and the printed income restrictions and FMRs. We are providing these files give the community of casing analysts a chance to use a consistent set of affordability measures.
HUD 2011 Good Market Rent Documentation System. This system provides complete paperwork of the advancement the Final FY 2011 Reasonable Market Rent (FMRs) for virtually any area of the country selected by user. After selecting the required geography, an individual is supplied a page made up of a summary of how a FY 2011 FMRs had been developed and updated beginning with the formation with the FY 2011 FMR Areas from the city Core-Based Record Areas (CBSAs) as structured on the Office of Management and Budget, the 2000 Census benchmark, the newly available 2008 American Community Review (ACS) 12 months data and the newly obtainable 2006-2008 3-year data, including information by Final FY 2010 FMRs, and updating to FY 2011 including information coming from local Randomly Digit Phone dialing (RDD) study data. The tables around the summary page include backlinks