Closing discussion for tough trial of ned kelly

Excerpt from Composition:

Final Argument

A modern-day reenactment: the tough trial of Ned Kelly

This is the history of a brave hero. A valiant head and daring luminary, who was not scared to stand up for rights. It’s the story of a guy who was not really afraid to stand up to get his as well as his community, and deal with to defend against an oppressive government and a damaged and chaotic police force.

This brave gentleman is Ned Kelly. In fact it is precisely due to his strong sense of justice and leadership capacity that produced him a target of the police and government.

We have seen the fact that police would resort to uncivilized violence for the sake of maintaining buy in a rigged system, that reduced the Irish Catholics of this country to poor, 2nd course citizens. The authorities were blindly carrying out the British government’s system, which relegated the Irish Catholics to everlasting inferior position. It was a method that unplaned British national superiority.

Although Ned had not been one to passively accept this sort of inequality. And that is what switched him into an enemy in the eyes of the federal government.

Ladies and gentlemen, Ned Kelly is innocent. This individual sits just before you here today, certainly not because of any kind of true plaisanterie or wicked that this individual actually harbored. He is located before you on trial for simply exercising his right of self-defense against ongoing and repeated chaotic and intense police episodes on him and his family.

The Real Story of this Trial

Let’s recap the evidence offered to you in today’s trial, beginning with the beginning. Ned comes from a proud Irish Catholic family who always resented the culture of control and dominance structured on the British empire. Ned and his friends challenged corrupt police, greedy terrain barons plus the wealthy institution in a quest to reform contemporary society for the better.

For this reason the constables despised him. So they hunted him down, consistently harassed him, and mistakenly accused him of wrongdoing. They caught his mother and friends only to frighten him. They arrested Ned himself based upon invented reports of taken horses or being inebriated in public. Law enforcement came to his house and instigated lethal shootouts with Ned fantastic friends. You heard evidence of one constable, Fitzpatrick, really had it for Ned. He sexually assaulted Ned’s sister and then spread an incorrect rumor that Ned had attacked him.

In spite of this kind of mistreatment by police, the testimony you might have heard here has demonstrated that Ned includes a solid personality. He was really loyal to his family members, friends, and supporters. He was intelligent and articulate, and attempted to advocate for self-reliance and dignity for his people simply by writing several editorials and letters. The British-controlled magazines refused to create Ned’s writings. Ned and his crew might have held up two British-run villages and robbed British banking institutions, but they did so without shooting a single taken. Moreover, Ned wrote numerous essays proudly owning up to this disobedience – he never tried to manage and cover. In these albhabets that were dismissed by the press, Ned described that his actions had been part of a greater moral movement for independence.

You found an example of Ned’s writings in his Jerilderie notification of Feb 10, 1879, wherein he demanded similar treatment. Considerably more . chance to review that notice again in the deliberations. That letter was just one of many examples of Ned’s intelligent and civilized work to tone of voice opposition towards the inequalities from the British system. Ned has not been alone – his letters reflected the feelings of countless followers. However, rather than cooperating with Ned and his followers, the police responded to the Jerilderie letter with even harsher and more aggresive militaristic tactics.

These aggressive police methods are part

Tweet