Condom distribution to teens composition

Over the past 3 decades, condom syndication has not properly helped against sexually transmitted diseases (STD) or teenage pregnancies mainly because condoms are used incorrectly or perhaps not at all. Problem remains: will it encourage teens to engage in sex by simply pushing condoms in their hands? We will explore the potency of the program, taxpayer views, and religious sights. The theory generally accepted in justifying the distribution of condoms to teenagers is the will protect them against being pregnant and STDs. However , in all honesty handing out condoms to teens is a pharmaceutical for tragedy.

Condom usage to curb motherhood and STDs may be misinterpreted by making a false perception of protection in people in whose behavior continually put them in danger. “We simply cannot tell people how much protection condoms provide,  explained Dr . Malcolm Potts, among the inventors or prophylactics lubed with spermicide and leader of Family members Health Intercontinental, a nonprofit contraceptive exploration group in North Carolina. I’m always astonished that we know the atomic framework of the SUPPORTS virus but don’t know very much about condoms.

 Critically, if one of the inventors of condoms is definitely stating he can not sure just how effective they are, then why promote use through the condom distribution applications in colleges? [ (Grunson) ] The assumption really should not be that all teens are wanting or ready to always be sexually energetic. “Schools send a nonsensical message if they teach children not to have sex but then give them condoms [ (Limbaugh) ]. The solution is not just creating a basket of condoms soaking in the nurse’s office. The condom syndication program motivates sexual activity and fosters the concept premarital sex is acceptable.

While many people don’t support the condom distribution plan, it is nonetheless being used, despite a very limited success rate because of the inability to make certain teens are using condoms on a regular basis. In a 1988 survey executed throughout the Us, 27 percent of low income, under no circumstances been married teens that relied on condoms started to be pregnant due to inconsistent condom use [ (JD) ]. Towards a more personal case, that of Cyntria Webber, the availability of condoms did not stop her from having sex with out a condom and having pregnant. Cyntria is offered as saying, “I merely wasn’t thinking of birth control at the time.  According to the same origin neither was the father of her child [ (Natale) ].

A major problem while using condom syndication program is teens not really using condoms consistently or correctly. In accordance to Issu, “A condom gives you the courage to get in the backseat, but you don’t use that once you get back there.  If consistent and address use of condoms could be set up among teens, then probably the condom program will produce better results. But as we understand, this is not the truth. A study considered at San Francisco’s Balboa High School confirmed disastrous effects for those needing the condom distribution plan to succeed. According to the January-February 1991 issue of Family Planning Perspectives: 2. The number of college students having sex bending.

* The schools’ total pregnancy charge increased in pregnancy. * There was an increase in sexually transmitted diseases. Once condoms had been distributed in Balboa High school graduation, the outcome was the opposite of what the plan set out to do. The program failed horribly; the exposure to Sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancies doubled rather than decreasing. This method was designed to reduce annual teenage births but instead they spiraled upward by simply one third. This figure didn’t include range of teens who also aborted all their pregnancies. Without even those numbers, the increase in births using a condom syndication program unchanged is incredible [ (JD) ]. On Summer, 10th, 2011, Pope, Benedict XVI was ridiculed, even by the Catholics, for his statement, “We cannot fix the problem of aids simply by distributing condoms.  Irrespective of arguments over the morality associated with an individual’s usage of a condom, there is no doubt about the Vatican’s certainty the promotion of condoms has become a failure in the battle against AIDS [ (Fink) ]. The condom syndication program in general public schools irritates people’s religions.

But offering students with condoms within a publicly funded environment gives a potential offence to people via a variety of beliefs. Catholics and followers of other religions who don’t believe in contraception find the apparent encouragement of sexual acts an affront to their faith based traditions. Numerous religions are members of society, and people citizens have got a right to voice their particular views regarding condom circulation or devices in their schools. Schools are not the place pertaining to condom devices, just as colleges are not that place pertaining to cigarette equipment or alcoholic beverages bars. Many high school students also have a problem cigarette smoking and drinking, but that will not mean educational institutions should spread filtered cigs or have a designated driver software. Certain activities, such as having and cigarette smoking, are legitimately appropriate for adults. Sexual activity should also be recognized as an activity ideal reserved for adult adults. Schools are even promoting safe sexual intercourse to teenagers as fresh as 18. A teen that young should not be involved in sexual intercourse at all.

The Obama administration features launched a $110 million teen pregnancy reduction effort that may support a variety of programs, including those that teach about the risks of specific lovemaking activities, and the benefits of contraception; and others target primarily about encouraging teens to hold off sex. One is the Thorough Sex Education program which in turn promotes disuse from love-making, acknowledges that lots of teenagers will end up sexually active, and educates teens regarding contraception and condom work with. This includes discussion posts about abortion, STDs, and HIV. Investigator Douglas Kirby, of the Countrywide Campaign to finish Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, examined research of prevention programs which in turn had a strong experimental design and employed appropriate evaluation. Two thirds from the 48 complete sex-ed applications studied had positive effects [ (Stein) ].

Get real. Taxpayers probably should not have to support programs that they can find morally objectionable. Popular condom distribution will establish sexual activity as the norm between young teens, creating peer pressure to participate in sexual intercourse. The added temptations to engage in sexual activity that may be “protected will result in more women having sex at a younger era. Providing teens with condoms actually stimulates the earlier onset of sexual activity. In the event teens believe they will be “safe when using a condom, they are much probably be deterred coming from engaging in dangerous and immoral behavior.

20 years ago once i was 14, you had to get yourself a permission slip signed to just attend love-making education class. But today teenagers can obtain condoms, birth control, and pregnancy assessments without parents’ consent. This can be so incorrect: In fact it is sickening! It should be left up to the mother or father to raise their children and decide what to allow their children to obtain. Teenagers don’t understand all the health hazards involved with love-making. Condoms are not a cure-all.

Today, everybody wants a miracle drug, a few magic concoction, but nothing is usually 100 percent effective. That’s a strategy people only don’t understand. Even though you use condoms, it doesn’t show that you can sleeping with a new person everyday devoid of risk. “The safe love-making message just isn’t true,  said Doctor Bruce Voeller, who is performing research within the effectiveness plus the durability of condoms. He added, “You’re still playing a sort of Russian different roulette games. Instead of having six principal points in the holding chamber, you have one [ (Grunson) ]. It’s a dangerous game that teens do not think about during the heat from the moment.

Even with decades of trying distinct programs to minimize statistics in teen Sexually transmitted diseases and unplanned pregnancies, a highly effective approach can be not placing condoms in teenager hands. In fact , the condom syndication program inside schools hasn’t prevented Sexually transmitted diseases or pregnancies; it has carried out the opposite as shown by the increase in STDs and teenage pregnancies. By providing condoms, schools offend someones religions and make taxpayers pay the price of the system. Even with the so-called great intentions this system was designed to have, it can turned a page in history and not in a confident way. Safe sex is currently referred to as safer sex; yet , in reality, really not. Offering condoms is a band-aid on a huge issue that keeps rotating out of control.

Works Cited

Fink, David F. “AIDS and Condom Distrabution.  The Archdiocese of Indianapolis Online. 10 Jun. 2011. Web http://archindy.org/ 08 Jul. 2011. Gruson, Lindsey. “Condoms: Experts Dread False Feeling Of Reliability.  The brand new York Instances. 08 Jul. 2007. Web. http://www.nytimes.com/ 08 Jul. 2011. Hartigan, JD. “The terrible results of condom circulation programs.  National Center for Biotechnology Information. 25 Mar. 1999. Web http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ 08 Jul. 2011. Limbaugh, Rush H. Condoms: The newest Diploma. Boston: Bedford Books, 1996. 428. Print. Originel, Jo Ould -. “The Sizzling New World in Sex Male impotence.  American School Board Journal (1995): 18-25. Printing. Stein, Deceive. “Teen birth rate strikes historic low.  The Washington Post.

2 Feb. 2011 Web http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ 08 Jul. 2011.

1

Tweet