Society provides other alternatives to reducing crime than simply locking people in
prison. Preventative programs focus on the community, school, family, employment
and places. Additionally , there are therapy and restorative justice
programs that can also be used to decrease crime. Prisons are the simply
alternatives we hear about by politicians as a result of notion that prisons
happen to be tough on crime. In reality, the method that reduces criminal offense the
many is the toughest on offense, and many research studies
demonstrate prisons are not the best alternatives. Over 65% in the people
convicted for 3-Strikes are for drug-related offenses. There is superb evidence
that putting many 3-Strikers in rehabilitation programs costs a smaller amount to
world overall than simply putting them in penitentiary for twenty-five years or more. In
addition, you will find preventative applications that can be used as opposed to the
prison cellular. Each $1 we spend on prisons is actually a $1 that individuals could dedicate elsewhere
(or not be taxed inside the first place). The problem with only dealing with crime by
locking persons in jail is that they have done nothing to alleviate the roots of
the problems that cause criminal offense in our society. Other people will be born and grow up
in the same areas where the previous offenders existed and will probably devote
the same acts because the root problems still exist. There is very much
evidence that the gap between wealthy plus the poor is growing in the United
States. Regrettably, the U. S. s response to the situation has been: The
rich receive richer, and the poor obtain prison. To pay attention to street criminal offenses and
drug-related crimes can be considered a hidden way to set up attention camps
pertaining to the poor and minorities. There is much evidence that white-collar corporate
bad guys cause a lot more economic riches to be illegitimately distributed and can
result in a lot more deaths and injuries than street offense (e. g., violating
protection standards in employment, emission of environmental hazards). Really does society
spend as much to enforce the laws to them? Are they brought to prison for the same
sentences because the poor road criminals? Happen to be wealthy users of drugs winding up in
the prisons? The control and punishment versions adopted
by the U. H. may cause various other problems. Sociable rebellion and deviance among the list of
young may possibly increase. And, in an opposing manner, several of our youth may take hold of
control and punishment since the answers to all the
problems. An expanding devision amongst these two groupings could cause severe problems
in the future.