Critique a research article about nursing research

Study

Critique a Research Article Oosterveld-Vlug M. G., Pasman H. R. Watts., van Gennip I. Electronic., Muller M. T., Willems D. T., Onwuteaka-Philipsen N. D. (2014) Dignity as well as the factors that influence this according to nursing home residents: a qualitative interview study. Record of Advanced Nursing 70(1), 97-106.

This article is a critique of above mentioned breastfeeding research newspaper. It was done by six experts in the Holland with taking part nursing residence residents. The researchers consider nursing home residents’ dignity.

The title of this analysis paper features sixteen phrases. General suggestion is five to 10 words to get the title (Fischer Zigmond, 2004). Therefore this title can be defined as a lengthy name. This subject has keywords and can get idea regarding content in the paper to allow readers to find this conventional paper when looking a relevant data source (Bavdekar, 2016, Fischer Zigmond, 2004).

This analysis paper offers included the authors’ specialist status, their particular educational certification and also their particular addresses (Ryan-Wenger, 1992). And so the readers of this article can designate responsible people for the investigation and speak to authors (Fischer Zigmond, 2004).

The abstract of this research article has 258 phrases. Commonly an abstract has 150 to 300 words and phrases (Fischer Zigmond, 2004). Consequently this fuzy is in typical word selection. These creators have written their operate past tense while they may have written additional researchers’ work in present tense in the abstract(Fischer Zigmond, 2004). This subjective has the target, background, design, methods, outcomes, conclusions, suggestions and keywords. The abstract containsthe method, benefits, conclusions and recommendations for practice (Koopman, 97, Parahoo Reid, 1988). As a result this can be thought as a sufficient subjective.

These types of researchers have reviewedmany literature in launch and qualifications of this research paper. These types of parts give relevant details such as past researches and discussion of the clinical significance of the topic, and justifies the advantages of the study (Burns Grove, 2001, Polit Hungler, 1997), with appropriate recommendations (Fischer Zigmond, 2004). Consequently literature, introduction and backdrop can be defined as relevant for the research paper.

These experts have provided the research question in the “aim”. That problem is very well defined and clear. In the reporting of qualitative analysis, research query should be offered in a clear and thorough manner(Stiles, 1999). Therefore offering the research problem can be regarded as a good one.

The research design and also the technique were included in the “design” of this paper. These kinds of authors have got included a reference to justify their chosen design. The paper offers explained why the analysts have selected this method to collect data (Ingham‘Broomfield, 2008).

These experts have selected four Nursing Homes in the Holland for their study. These writers have reasoned their number of sample. This sampling was purposeful. The procedure used to choose participants ought to be clearly referred to and sampling should bepurposeful in qualitative research (Polkinghorne, 2005). These types of authors include ensured transferability through sufficient descriptions of sample (Letts et approach., 2007). This study provides presented qualities of participants (Low ain al., 1998). It seems the authors have got described this part completely.

These kinds of researchers have used open-ended questions in interviews to gather data a lot of the times. A number of open-ended queries are chosen to elicit various information feasible in the period available (Low et ‘s., 1998). Interviews have been conducted from May 2010 to June 2011 and lasted approximately forty-five to 60 minutes. Collection of data over a prolonged period improves the credibility (Letts et ‘s., 2007). Info were accumulated by three methods. That methods will be interviews, field notes and interviewer’s glare on the selection interviews. Using multi-methods to info collection is called triangulation (Burns Grove, 2001, Patton, 1999, Polit Hungler, 1997, Williamson, 2005). Triangulation uses to confirmation and completeness of information (Jick, 1979, Shih, 1998, Streuburt Carpenter, 1999), to try validity (Carter, Bryant-Lukosius, Dicenso, BlytheNeville, 2014), and also to improve credibility and trustworthiness (Letts et approach., 2007). This kind of data collection part appears to be written incredibly clearly.

Ethical considerations have in particular paper, but these authors have never described all of them. The authors of the research paper ought to describe values procedures which include how educated consent was obtained and recorded inside the research newspaper (Letts ainsi que al, 2007). Therefore through this research newspaper, the writers may not plainly described moral procedures.

After 20 interviews were carried out and analyzed, data saturation has become achieved (Oosterveld-Vlug et approach., 2014). These authors possess described just how achieved the info saturation. The researcher should certainly indicate how and when your decision was reached that there is sufficient depth of information to fulfill the uses of the analyze (Low et al., 1998). Dependability of this research was enhanced, due to this paper features clearly described the process of info analysis (Letts et ‘s., 2007).

These writers have explained about coding in the “rigour”. In this “rigour” these authors described how the researchers assure reliability with the coding procedure and this ensures trustworthiness of study (Houghton, Casey, Shaw Murphy, 2013, Letts ou al., 2007). This examine has explained how the results emerged from the data (Letts et al., 2007).

These creators have defined results with participants’ concepts in selection interviews. This analyze interpreted benefits and their ramifications, instead of just presenting these questions descriptive method (Bach, 2015). Results were crafted in earlier tense (Johnson, 2008). These authors included expected effects and also unpredicted results (Davidson Delbridge, 2011). The outcomes seems to be plainly described.

This analysis paper has a discussion. Intercontinental comparison and limitations have got included because sub-topics. These types of authors possess explained key findings in the study, importance of results, specialized medical relevance, option explanations, limits and ideas including relevant references (Hess, 2004). Therefore this debate can be viewed as a good one.

This bottom line has authors’ recommendations. It is considered as successful (Letts ain al., 2007, Low ain al., 1998, Shidham, Pitman DeMay, 2012), but it is difficult to find essential findings from the research.

These experts have included many sources cited in the research conventional paper in minuscular order. Then this readers can easily follow it easily (Davidson Delbridge, 2011, Fischer Zigmond 2004), but a lot of them are out of date. The referencesimprove readability and validity of the article (Taylor, 2002).

Tweet