Decreasing the voting age to 16 essay

A debate that has seemed to become more popular in the past couple of years is definitely the voting age group n the United States, and if it should be lowered to sixteen. Many young adults across the nation have reached away and attempted to bigot to help get the subject matter some focus and get those inside the political world talking. Numerous others, mostly adults, are shocked and shocked at this idea, and don’t apparently take them or perhaps the uproar for the debate significantly.

I have discovered 3 articles via a number of different types of sources on this debate.

To keep it interesting, We included articles or blog posts that were opposed as well as proponents lowering the voting era. These articles are ‘Top 10 Reasons for Cutting down the Voting Age, ‘ ‘Don’t Drop the Voting Age, ‘ and ‘Maintain Our Voting Standards. ‘ The initially article, named the ‘Top Ten Causes of Lowering the Voting Age’ was authored by the Countrywide Youth Legal rights Association. That held very strong, sound arguments and reasons for convincing its audience of their claim to lower the voting era to 18.

It was amazing how many and varied reasons they gave to support all their views and content that they included prevalent opposing arguments. The author also included evidence and reasoning to derail these common views on the matter. Logos was one of the most common appeals used in this article, that they tried to stay very logical so that their very own arguments were more sound and harder to prove wrong. One of the most prevalent arguments employed against lowering the voting age is the fact teenagers are not mature, dependable, or clever enough.

They managed to shed some light on this prevalent viewpoint when they proclaimed that, Voting Rights Act of 1965 states that: ‘any person who is actually not adjudged an incompetent and who has accomplished the sixth grade in any State or territory, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Lujoso where teaching is carried on predominantly in the English terminology, possesses enough literacy, understanding, and cleverness to political election in any selection. ‘

When a Sixth level education is definitely deemed satisfactory knowledge to vote, how could older children be refused the right to have your vote? They managed to bring a refreshing fresh point to the table, with almost a slight sarcastic undertone. As the modern idea starts to sink in, it is easy to go along with them, when a sixth quality education may be the requirement to vote, then it is rational that of sixteen year olds should be in order to vote. Additionally, they continue on with using logical appeals, which has a sensible point against the same subject, “The fact is, intellect or maturity is not the basis upon which the right to vote is naturally, if which were the case all voters will need to pass a test ahead of voting.

Youth shouldn’t be kept to a stricter standard than adults; reduced the voting age.  This statement is quite straightforward and speaks to get itself, even though youth and adults are treated in a different way in other sensory faculties, on the subject of voting, if it is certainly not based only on maturity and brains, then what claims the actual opposers need to stop the potential of lowering the voting age group? It maintains to the logical sense, and clearly undermines the common questions toward the debate in front of you.

If you think as to what the author is attempting to convey and what target they are aiming to reach, it is a national connection trying to help get the voting age decreased, they did not use very much ethos throughout their article, but it wasn’t really necessary for them to support reach this goal of rethinking the legal voting age. Their particular main appeal was trademarks, and that by itself for them was powerful and convincing enough, because they remained quite unbiased throughout the article and thus remained purely logical and factual, which is easy to influence an audience given that they appreciate it.

We were holding just looking to get the facts in existence and explain why they will feel the age group should be reduced. They definitely include knowledge on the subject, and they definitely know what they’re talking about. A good example of where they will used ethos to help their particular claim is usually when they estimate a college teacher,  A 1996 study by Generic Merrill, a great Arizona Express University writing professor, located a strong increase in turnout. Merrill compared turnout of signed up voters in five urban centers with Children Voting with turnout in five cities without the system.

Merrill identified that between five and ten percent of respondents reported Kids Voting was a aspect in their decision to vote. This indicated that 600, 000 adults nationwide were encouraged to vote by the program.  This declaration actually uses two appeals to ethos, an outside source who may be knowledgable within the topic, and a record study that helps prove that lowering the voting age would possibly help increase the voter turnout, although many persons say in any other case.

Pathos also seemed lacking in this article, but as I said before, was unnecessary, simply because were aiming to achieve a rational, complete disagreement that would be hard to challenge and easy to convince a group. This is an ideal way of convincing an audience with no taking the convenient way out, as much do, by simply appealing to only their thoughts. Another common, easy method authors use for make their particular arguments is making unstated assumptions, which can be easier to derail and also sort of the sluggish way out, you will find more dignified ways of producing a solid declare, that won’t always be rebuttaled and so quickly.

Unstated assumptions is another tactic the writer of the ‘Top Ten Reasons for Lowering the Voting Age’ did not contain, which makes their article much better, mainly because as stated previously, others usually are so quick to rebuttal against these people, since unstated assumptions no longer include actual, legitmate causes of their bring about and debate. The second document, ‘Don’t Drop the Voting Age, ‘ is from a Canadian online mag that protects all kinds of issues, by Robyn Urback.

Her opinion is quite clear from the beginning of the document, when she begins with an imagination, “In this kind of fantasyland, the Liberals run on a solid platform of increased Justin Bieber performances, even though the Conservatives will be trailing with the “More University Dances five-year-plan. The NDP’s “We’ll Talk to your Mom about Extending your Curfew assurance, however , have not really removed.  Funny, yet an important over hyperbole, as if that is what happens if teens were given the justification to vote.

Her tone through this complete article, while shown in many quotes, demonstrates that she would not take teenagers, even children, very seriously, she appears to look at the complete idea of reducing the voting age as being a joke, and a sarcastic tone lights through in her writing often as well. She also analyzes B. C. Liberal leadership candidate Robert de Jong’s idea that 16-year-olds should be able to election in provincial elections because it will create a “culture of engagement simply by getting teenagers to the forms early, to giving out opsicles at polling stations.

It might be ovious right away in her article that she is quite biased, and it seems that her clouded, close-minded judgment affects her capacity to convince her audience and provide a solid disagreement for her claim in the beginning of her content. That being said, she still delivers her viewers with interests logos, ethos, and pathos, and tries to include a large number of outside resources as well as remain more neutral after her immature responses in the preamble of her article.

The girl continues upon, “While advancing the political election to 16- and 17-year-olds would spectacularly increase turnout in the newly-formed “Under 18 category, the relative figures will be in the same way abysmal maintain yourself aged 18-24. In fact , they would probably be a whole lot worse. Statistics show that voter turnout increases with age, also within the 18-24 category. And so if these trends are any sign, 16-year-olds may likely have the most severe showing of all. “

She begins this kind of quote by using logic, that lowering the voting era would boost turnout inside the under 18 category, stating the obvious, yet says that they can wouldnt always be much different from the turnout pertaining to the 18-24 category. Almost all very true, nevertheless how does your woman know that the amount for those underneath eighteen would not be virtually any different from all those ages 18 to twenty four? In reality, the lady doesn’t, she’s making a great unstated assumption, which has no real backing or perhaps evidence, and so does not support her debate at all, it truly ruins it because every she did was give us with her personal judgment and tips, which would not help to encourage us very well.

She will appeal to ethos from this quote, by including that statistics (although she does include wherever they arrived from) display that voting increases with age. If perhaps that assertion is true, and proven simply by statistics, in that case wouldn’t lowering the voting age to 16 help the 18-24 age group increase? The girl did not contain that point, which is surprising considering it seems like a very good one, but it really is obviously because would again derail her previous debate that decreasing the voting age will not help whatever.

The author goes on to talk about the implications of the sixteen year old voting if perhaps they were “bribed by their father and mother, or with a stroke of luck that they voted, what knowledge would they have in what they’d be voting for? She makes a rational point to help this claim, “With handful of more than a decade out of diapers, the newly-authorized arrêters would have tiny life encounter from which to draw political conclusions or cast an educated vote. Alternatively though, being uninformed does not negate one’s right to election.

Even when people are back in diapers, they can still cast a ballot, irrespective of their probably eroding thinking abilities. Naturally , not all 90-year-olds have lost their very own wits, whereas no 16-year-old can remember, for instance , the tax-happy premier that hijacked the province two terms in the past.  First off, makes sure that she added the phrase ‘diapers’ simply to make sure that her audience will not forget 14 year olds still use them, and the girl makes a point when the lady makses an analogy between teens’ deficiency of experience and knowledge to senior citizens’ lack of recollection for their experiences, and they’re nonetheless technically in order to vote.

She also touches on the fact that teenagers are easily inspired, “There have been completely countless studies affirming how susceptible high school students are to exterior influence” and just count the quantity of Canada Goose brand wintertime jackets you see on young adults next time if you’re in a nearby mall if you have any doubts¦. Politics would become an even unsanitary game.  She is again making an unstated supposition that teens would be influenced by exterior sources just as much as she exaggerates that they carry out in her statement. Certainly, they usually are, and this lady has no real, factual evidence that they are motivated the way states they are.

The girl ends her article with all the statement, “Sixteen-year-olds should not be voting on that in which they may have little share, particularly during those conformative years once “relativism is really a word by using an English take quiz.  She went out of her way to make sure that the reader did not forget that teens will be, in fact , in high school. Your woman included a lot of pathos through this article, with snide comments towards children, teens, as well as the elderly, your woman made it extremely obvious, and she would not try to rule out her personal emotions and disdain to get lowering the voting grow older at all in her article.

It is surprising that the girl included a lot of her personal viewpoints and thoughts, because that will not help in persuasive her viewers to believe what she thinks, unless that they already go through the same way while she does on the subject. ‘Mainaining Our Voting Standards’ was the last content chosen for this analysis, authored by Michael J. Ring within the prestigious college of Massachusett’s Institute of Technology oldest online paper. He starts his document with the idea that both proposals to help reduced he voting age in Cambridge Town Council “Must be declined.  This individual also identifies these proposals as “Dangerous and troublesome.

He also states that, “The protests of bitter, whining pupils over the new Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment Program (MCAS) tests demonstrate that many teens are not yet adult enough to participate in the political procedure.  Maturity, a topic My spouse and i touched upon earlier in the National Youth Rights Association’s article research, where it truly is made clear that voting is not related to intelligence and maturity when considering many more mature adults with the same maturity as a 10 year old. It is rather obvious right from the start of this particular article what Michael J. Ring’s purpose and thoughts and opinions on the matter of lowering the voting age is, this individual feels very similarly about this as do Robyn Urback in her article My spouse and i mentioned previously, ‘Don’t Drop the Voting Age. ‘

He cares for you a lot about the Massachusetts Comprehensive Analysis System tests, and feels that children don’t. “A group of premature, angry young adults could wreak havoc within a close university committee selection, sweeping out candidates committed to high standards and the case reform in favor of candidates who will oppose MCAS and pander to the students’ selfish, myopic vision. This individual pretty much examines teens as to the sounds like a storm, ‘wreaking havoc’ and such. He makes a logical point if he states that, “Certainly, various 16-year-olds illustrate the maturity that should be needed of a décider, but undoubtedly many of their particular peers usually do not.  Isn’t very this authentic for adults too? I could think of many adults with the maturity of a adolescent, which makes young adults not much distinct.

He makes another point by making use of appeal to logos, “Councillors argue that interesting teens in the political process before that they leave intended for college will permit them to turn into knowledgeable about home town politics and form a voting behavior before giving for college¦ Any young voter away at university can easily follow hometown events with a little initiative.  News and information of events around the world is easy to find, fact. Obvious, nevertheless true level Michael T. Ring. This individual makes a terrible unstated presumption when he says, “Allowing non-citizens to election creates precisely the same problem that allowing 16-year-olds to vote would produce.

Granting the franchise to non-citizens injects a pool of voters who have simply no obligation to master about each of our political organizations into the electorate.  He’s comparing of sixteen year olds to non-citizens and saying sixteen year olds are not obligated to vote, basically, which is assuming that they can’t say for sure or value many of the issues they would political election on in the event that allowed the priviledge. Amazing that an author pulished in such an esteemed school’s on the net newspaper would make such a frivilous blunder.

1

Tweet