Dow s bid for rohm and haas dissertation

Dow started being a manufacturer of commercial bleach in 1897, and was founded simply by Herbert Dow. He merged his business in early 1900s with Midland Chemical, which lead to diversity of his portfolio to agricultural and food products. In 1912, Dow started to yield dividends every quarter without any cutbacks or disturbances. By doing so, these were the only Lot of money 200 organization that set up these numbers. Dow started to be a major participant in the M&a field, simply because they acquired between 1983 and 2007 95 business, had taken stakes in 58 businesses and divested 166 businesses.

In 2006, Dow’s CEO Andrew Liveris released the ‘Dow of Tomorrow’ strategy, which consisted of two pillars.

1 was pursuing an asset light approach to its commodity business. In order to do so , he authorized a JOINT VENTURE agreement having a subsidiary from the Kuwait Petroleum Company, called Petroleum Industrial sectors Company. Dow and PICTURE signed a Memorandum of Understanding, which generated Dow a $7. 2 billion after duty revenues. Second, Mr. Liveris wanted to make a high-growth and high-value added performance organization.

In order to achieve this target, Dow decided to purchase Rohm and Haas. This acquisition had the idea for Dow to become a developer of high-value chemicals and advanced components.

Why does Dow want to buy Rohm and Haas?

As mentioned inside the introduction, CEO Andrew Liveris announced the ‘Dow of Tomorrow’ strategy. This included becoming a high growth and high-value added producer of specialty chemicals, with fewer cyclicality. Rohm and Haas fitted the picture perfectly, simply because they were an advanced material and specialty chemicals company, within 27 countries. Besides the interesting company account description, there are several other reasonswhy Dow was interested in the Rohm and Haas business. Most important reason was that the acquisition will make Dow decrease its cyclicality and enhance its progress prospects. Expanded product portfolios, increased geographic market, better market programs and innovative technologies will obtain the predicted growth and cost synergies.

Forecasts anticipate additional expansion synergies beliefs between $2. 0 and $2. six billion and $0. eight billion costs synergies, which include shared services and governance, manufacturing, supply chain and work process improvements. Apart from the above-mentioned advantages, Dow and Rohm is actually a global leader in specialty chemical compounds and advanced materials in the event they put together forces. Also by merging their R&D, the development of new items and improvements could be stimulated. So overall, Rohm and Haas built in the picture forecasted by Claire Liveris perfectly. Rohm and Haas supported Dow’s dedication to maintain their highest criteria in chasing and choosing growth for you to satisfy their very own long-term aktionär values.

Was $78 every share an acceptable bid?

In order to draw a conclusion in the reasonability from the bid, we need to valuate Rohm and Haas as a firm with and without the synergetic effects created by the acquisition. If perhaps this total value exceeds the $78 share price, Dow are going to pay the price, as it will be beneficial for them. Some great benefits of the synergetic effects can be determined by separating it involving the two companies on a multiple or 50/50 basis.

The excel document attached to the assignment comprised a WACC of almost eight, 5% based on a taxes rate of 35%. Inside our analysis, we all also computed a WACC with a tax rate of 26%, since this was the common tax rate. This leads to a WACC of 8, 7%. As a basis, we took 2% growth.

Rohm and Haas had for time of the acquisition 195, 200, 1000 shares exceptional. From the “balance sheet” of Rohm and Haas 2008H1, we took the values of cash and debt (long and short-run debt). Both equally inputs were needed in order to calculate the share price. Below, you will find how we computed the talk about price pertaining to the conditions with and without synergies.

The synergies engaged consist of two different types, namely growth and cost synergetic effects. Growth synergies include extended product portfolios, increased geographic reach, increased market programs and impressive technologies. These kinds of synergies are required to create between 2 and 2 . 6th billion dollars, which gives typically 2 . three or more billion. Second, potential price synergies include purchasing synergies, shared providers and governance, manufacturing & supply cycle improvements and work procedure optimization. These kinds of synergies are required to generate 0. 8 billion dollars dollar. The values of the synergies combined totals a 3. you billion dollars gross gain, which is a netted by deducting the 1 . 3 billion cost of execution, leaving a worth of 1. eight billion us dollars.

In order to make the most suitable valuation and draw the best conclusion for the reasonability of the discuss price of $78, put into effect the original and revised prediction into account. Equally cases are also used for the sensitivity examination to be while specific as it can be. Below are the sensitivity studies of Rohm and Haas for the original forecasts.

Based upon our assumptions, share cost of Rohm and Haas is $55. 79 devoid of synergies and $65. 01 with synergies. These beliefs differ slightly from the reveal price all of us found in each of our valuation evaluation, however this is due to rounding and number of decimals difference in WACC and growth proportions. Lowest benefit without synergetic effects is $47. 10 having a growth of 1% and a WACC of 9% and a highest share price of $95. 58 which has a growth of 3% and a WACC of 7%. If we now consider the original outlook with groupe, we see an elevated share value, which is rational, since benefit is created by synergy. The share price of Rohm and Haas is $65. 01 depending on the growth price of 2% and a WACC of 8. seven percent. The reveal price differ between lowest value of $56. thirty-two and highest value of $104. eighty, based on the same input just like the analysis with no synergetic effects.

In both equally cases, the share cost is below $78 so in the event Dow provides this value in both equally situations, the will not cash in on this buy. However , we all will still perform the 50/50 and multiples value in order to discover which is the very best in the situation if perhaps Dow is usually obliged to obtain Rohm and Haas. Seeking atcase had been synergies are set up and using the 50/50 technique, we get a share value of $55. 79 + ($65. 01 ” $55. 79)/2 sama dengan $60. 5. As we mentioned previously, this cost does not meet the $78. Now using the gross income of Rohm and Haas as a percentage of the low profit of both businesses combined, we have a multiple of 26. 11%. Applying this 0, 2611 multiple, the right share price is $55. 79 + (0, 2611 5. (65. 01 ” $55. 79)) sama dengan $58. 20 Again, this is certainly below the reveal price of $78, that makes the outcomes of both strategies unfavorable intended for Dow.

Today let us consider the revised outlook. Since this is a post-crisis forecast, predictions were lowered, which usually lead to a reduced overall worth. Hence, this will likely be reflected in our tenderness analysis by simply lower discuss prices. Listed here are our studies.

As previously predicted, share prices will be lower in the revised forecast due to the turmoil adjustments. In the interest of the case, we all will also execute a 50/50 and multiples computation. If we glance at the 50/50 discuss price, we have a reveal price of $41. 35 + ($50. 60 ” $41. 38)/2 = $45. 99. The multiples basis will give us a talk about price of $41. 35 + (0, 2661 * ($50. 60 ” $41. 38)) = $43. seventy nine.

Reviewing both forecasts and within these types of forecasts the two with minus synergy, we can conclude that the share cost of $78 is certainly not reasonable. This conclusion holds in the case of 50/50 and many calculations.

Main deals dangers and allocation

We will pay special attention to Exhibit 4 once examining the major risks and their respective allocations. The 1st risk comes from the item 1 ) 01 talking about the financing of the package. Dow will issue a fixed amount of $4 billion dollars in transformable preferred stocks and shares to Berkshire, Hathaway and Kuwait Purchase Authority. This kind of amount can be independent of the current stock selling price of Dow, meaning that a drop in Dow’s discuss price will need more shares to pay for the deal, decreasing the relative voting rights of current shareholders. To be a lot more precise, in paragraph 2 . 1a this states that no matter what happens Dow has to pay out $78 buck per talk about at the time of the merger, copying all the financialrisk to Dow.

Furthermore, a big part of the offer is loaned with a $13 billion financial loan, issued with a consortium of 19 banking institutions lead simply by Citigroup, Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley, increasing all their leverage rate and total risk of the corporation. These excessive debt principles come with high interest payments, leaving fewer funds to meet their dividend obligations. In a feasible economic downturn this problem becomes bigger, increasing the probability of not meeting all their dividend payments which have not been improved for over ninety-seven years.

An extra interesting statement is the ticking fee to ensure the deal will close. When the deal can be not shut down before January 10, 2009, the repayment per talk about will increase with 8% every year, translating to the next deal value of approximately $3 million more per day before the deal can be closed. Additionally if the package is not really closed just before October 12, 2009, Dow has to pay $750 , 000, 000 termination cost. This will, again, transfer all of the risk to Dow in case the deal can not be closed before October 10, 2009.

In paragraph 3. 1 the fabric Adverse Result clause declares that Dow is in order to withdraw from the transaction in case the business, operations or economical conditions of Rohm is hit by a material negative effect. This seems reasonable but there is also a large pair of exceptions made in the clause for which Dow cannot pull away from the deal, including the pursuing events: virtually any event which in turn affects the chemical sector, macro economic system as a whole, the financial, debt, credit or security industry, any decrease in Rohm’s stock selling price or any failure to meet interior or printed projections. Therefore , in case of an economic downturn largely Dow is affected rather than Rohm. Wander and Haas are even protected from a decline in their share value. Thus, the statements above will, again, transfer just about all the risk to Dow

Furthermore, Dow takes on another risk by counting on the joint venture with Kuwait’s PIC to finance $7 billion with the deal. They don’t take into account the possibility that this partnership could fail as a result of i. electronic. a downturn in the overall economy. If it fails this leaves a niche of $7 billion inside their financing prepare, exposing Dow to more risk.

Finally, the overall high price and ticking clauses set a risky package when compared to the expected synergies. The probability of achieving almost all expected synergies is a size smaller than the probability of high costs, which can be certain. This leaves Dow exposed to a possibly large loss when the anticipated synergies are certainly not met in the future.

The only risk that Rohm and Haas face is the possible termination from the deal off their side in the event the deal can be i. elizabeth. taking a long time. They have to shell out a $600 million termination fee in the event the decide to do so. Other than that, thinking about the mentioned risk allocations from above, the total risk of this offer is mainly sleeping on the shoulders of Dow Chemical.

CEO recommendations

To offer a complete perspective of the choices that equally CEOs got at the time we all will initially describe the case they were in. Shortly following the deal announcement the financial crisis started, triggering an overall recession including inside the chemical industry. Dow was hit in many methodologies: overall talk about prices fallen with over 50%, a fourth 1 / 4 loss of $1. 6 billion dollars, quarterly revenue decline of 23% and a drop in functioning rate to 44% in 2008. Making Dow to shut off 20 facilities and firing over 5000 staff. Furthermore, following your joint venture offer was closed with KPC’s PIC, the failing olive oil prices and overall downturn caused KPC to terminate the contract by spending a termination fee of $2. five billion to Dow. This kind of caused a niche in the monetary plan for the merger to get Dow, reducing their share price even more and awkward their score to BBB.

As mentioned ahead of, Dow had not been the only one troubled by the economic recession. Rohm was facing a poor performance as well, forcing that to fire above 900 staff, freeze spending and a 20% decline in sales.

Considering the previously mentioned, Dow declined to close the deal with Rohm and Haas after acceptance from the European Commission and U. H. Federal Transact Commission. Arguing that the the latest macro-economic improvements are materials adverse effects, enabling them to terminate the deal.

Options and advice for Dow’s CEO, Toby Liveris

Thinking about the situation since described previously mentioned, Liveris acquired three different choices: continue while using termination in the deal, close the deal for $78 every share or perhaps renegotiate with Rohm and Haas to agree on several terms. In the event Dow is constantly on the terminate the offer it will go to court for the approval by judge. It requires to earn in courtroom otherwise Dow is forced to commit to the deal. Presented the assertions enclosed in the material negative effect clause, the chances intended for Dow to win are pretty thin. If Liveris opts to shut the deal to get $78 every share he will probably need a lot of additional funds. Considering the economy, and the fact that the joint venture failed, obtaining this quantity of additional cash will be very hard.

The possibility to acquire more personal debt through the already existing bridge loan from the bank from 19 different banks is fairly small with the low credit rating of BBB. If he does achieve acquiring more debt he may probably not be able to meet the net-debt-to-total-capitalization restriction in the covenant. This is, according to the first loan of $13 billion, required to be lower than 65% which they are not able to meet up with, thus certainly not creating bonuses for the banks to lend more cash.

Considering the previously mentioned, terminating the offer will not be conceivable and making the sale for $78 per discuss lacks funding. The best option Andrew Liveris therefore has is always to renegotiate the merger deal and buy a little while. He will after that be able to try to find other sources of financing or renegotiate the already existing mortgage. One likely option could be to sue KPC for terminating the partnership and proclaiming the $2. 5 billion, which in turn could finance the termination payment. Considering that this will likely destroy the partnership between these two companies this would not end up being recommended.

Alternatives and suggestion for the CEO of Rohm and Haas, Raj Gupta The case for Raj Gupta is a bit simpler: either sue Dow for not completing the deal or renegotiate with Dow to postpone the deal. Both having different pros and cons.

The first option is to go to court docket and continue the case that Dow has to complete the offer or otherwise shell out the termination fee. Taking into consideration theexceptions set by the material negative effect clause that macro-economic effects and effect on the chemical market in general are excluded out of this clause, Gupta will have a strong case and it is likely to prevail in court docket. Committing Dow to the deal or otherwise paying the termination charge of $750 million.

The second option is always to renegotiate the offer with Dow. The most important downside considering this option is that it could almost certainly come to a package which is fewer favorable intended for Rohm and Haas as compared with the original offer. Which term should be reconsidered? For example , a lower price every share would decrease the predicted value to get the shareholders. Shareholders will not vote for this kind of a deal, particularly the Haas family members who owns thirty percent of the company and is holding out to exit for $78 a share. The only option, though shareholders are not amused in the least, is to hold off the deadline of the offer, preserving the harmony between companies.

Even if Gupta can win in court, the possibility that the deal will go through thinking about the financing challenges of Dow is still small. Rohm and Haas is going to in this case only receive the end of contract fee of $750 , 000, 000. Gupta naturally wants the deal to go through and so do the investors of Rohm and Haas, enabling them to exit the business and receiving a higher premium while doing so. Terminating the deal is going to negatively impact both corporations and their shareholders. Therefore it will be better intended for Gupta to facilitate virtually any possibility that the deal goes through, even implying any decrease in cost per share. Our advice thus is to renegotiate the deal, making sure that this succeeds. The premium intended for the investors might be lower but equally companies can benefit from the bought synergies and shareholders can easily still opt to exit.

Resolving the legal argument

Considering the over, it would are typically in the best interest of equally companies to renegotiate the deal. However , Rohm and Haas decided to continue their path against Dow Chemicals. The judge will therefore make up your mind based upon the important points presented to him.

Based upon the facts only, the most probably option for me personally, William M. Chandlerthe Third, Chancellor in the Delaware Courtroom of Chancery, is to implement the combination contract between two celebrations. In particular, the specifics of the Material Negative Effect terms in section 3. one particular state that the MAE offer does not include the next events: “any event which usually affects the chemical market, macro economy as a whole, the financial, debts, credit or security industry, any fall in Rohm’s stock selling price or any failure to meet inner or posted projections.  To be further; the argument according to Dow which the recent material developments have created unacceptable uncertainties on the funding and economics of the combined enterprise, justifying the end of contract of the package, is overruled by the ‘specific performance’ offer in section 3. 1 )

Therefore , the ‘specific performance’ clause, as requested simply by Rohm and agreed upon simply by Dow, is binding and hereby unplaned. The combination will be performed as planned. Dow will have several different alternatives to solve the financing issue, cutting payouts, renegotiating debt and other methods to generate cash could be applied. If the package is certainly not closed ahead of January 15, 2009, mentioned previously in the contract, Dow will pay a ticking fee of 8% per year.

Dow must have been more careful creating the contract as it is authorized and prior to me today. Since the probability of an economic demise is especially set by the deal clause, I will generate no exception and hereby determine that the Dow will satisfy all deal requirements as stated in the contract. Every dime has to factors, if you risk it, you might lose it. Many thanks. *slams the hammer*

1

Tweet