Unfortunately, the American government has been seeking in the wrong place for people models, specially in Asia and Latin America. For example , the coca plant from which crack is derived increases in abundance in numerous geographical parts of northern South America and in Central America, where growers produce huge income as compared to work to pressure farmers and peasants to grow legal crops which will inevitably do not produce enough profits to be able to survive.
Of course , over the last 20 years or so, the U. S. federal government has been doing much including great charge to attempt to eliminate the developing of cocaína but these initiatives have also failed miserably. While Nadelmann pertains, even if foreign supplies of coca and also other drugs just like heroin could be cut off, “the drug abuse problem in the U. S i9000. would scarcely abate, ” due to the fact that much if not most of the prescription drugs like cannabis, amphetamines and hallucinogens (LSD) are made in the U. S i9000. Thus, if cocaine and heroin materials were taken away, drug users “would quickly substitute additional drugs” rather than cocaine and heroin, hence creating a never-ending cycle of drug replacement and a method wherein new types of medication are developed to replace this ones (1998, p. 113).
Nadelmann likewise points out that any drug control effort which depends upon source reduction is definitely futile and that the “single-minded quest for a medication free American society” is dangerously naive. Yet , the demand pertaining to drugs also plays an essential role in helping to design and implement any drug control policies, nevertheless this also is inherently unreasonable. Eventually, Nadlemann just sees medication legalization as the utmost effective approach to control drug abuse and the criminal activity associated with it; however , the U. S. federal government and most state government authorities see legalization as “politically unwise so that as risking increased drug use” (1998, l. 114).
One pertinent case is imagining waking up one morning to study a newspaper headline that says “Cocaine Legalized in the usa. ” With this, Nadelmann asserts “If a person before legalization never used cocaine, would he/she then begin applying cocaine mainly because it is legal? ” (1998, p. 115). Therefore , in the opinion of Nadelmann, the most economical and sensible medicine control insurance plan in the United States can be made up of some sort of harm reduction policy, including a cessation to putting persons in jail for medicine possession and an increase in treatment and substance abuse treatment applications, along with strictly-controlled legalization procedures.