Food, Inc.: How the Industrial Food can be Making all of us Sicker, Heavier and Lesser – and What You Can do About this (Karl Weber [editor])
“When you think of the California economy, you believe of high-tech industries just like Silicon Valley, you imagine of Showmanship. You don’t consider poor, needy migrants selecting fruits and vegetables with their bare hands” (p. 4).
This is interesting because people frequently associate spots with a few prominent things, disregarding many other edges of those places. It jogs my memory of how Korea is connected with high-tech industry, Hyundai and Samsung, although people usually do not think of Korean language art, music, history, or its everyone else much.
“Factory farms try to increase the range of animals that they raise each year. To do so, yet , they use a lot of practices that present health concerns for consumers” (p. 22).
This is a unique point mainly because industries today try to top their competition by increasing the level of production at all costs. In reality, consumer overall health must be guarded even in the cost of slower production, but you may be wondering what happens is that consumer health is affected for the sake of higher production. That is totally incorrect.
3. inches… companies try to convince us that they can execute a better task of policing themselves than the government may. I don’t believe any company should have the right to decide what is secure and not secure without a lot of government oversight, especially when they have billions of us dollars at stake” (p. 39).
I still find it interesting just how companies want to avoid oversight, claiming that they can police themselves although they always put their profits before consumer well being. Companies looking into themselves pertaining to unethical behavior is the same just like criminals checking out themselves pertaining to crime. How come would that they find mistake with their very own activities that they can rely upon to create money?
5. “In short, organics is around more than food. It’s regarding survival” (p. 59).
This can be an interesting declaration because we all normally consider food once we say “organics” but it much more than that. Getting rid of organics for the sake of funds may lead to a catastrophe.
a few. “The difference between traditional and contemporary techniques for enhancing the genetics of life lies not merely in the complexness of the research involved in the economics of sociable and corporate control implied by new methods” (p. 69).
I found this quotation interesting because, as the author points out further, moving from classic farming to industrial farming is not only regarding science. Economics and national politics of corporate control happen to be part of this shift. New farming approaches can be easily manipulated so that a few firms can enhance themselves in the expense of consumer well being.
1 . “Contrary to biotech industry promoción, recent research have found that U. S. maqui berry farmers growing GE [genetically modified food] plants are using in the same way many harmful pesticides and herbicides as conventional farmers and perhaps are using more” (p. 84).
This is interesting because significant companies spot one thing nevertheless do totally the opposite. And so they manage to do this by concealing their actions through promoción.
2 . “The grain required to fill a 25-gallon SUV gas tank with ethanol could feed one person for a complete year. ‘ And yet the us is providing large subsidies into a program that feeds autos, not people” (p. 93).
This is an interesting quote since it suggests that the us government is easily sacrificing the demands of people with regard to business passions. The offer refers to the business enterprise of hammer toe ethanol plan that is designed to give food to automobiles, not people – but on the expense of individuals.
3. “In 1965, ten billion animals animals were alive on earth at any presented moment; eight billion had been slaughtered annually. Today, thanks in part to CAFOs that spur faster growth and shorter life-span, twenty billion dollars livestock family pets are alive at any second, while almost fifty-five billion dollars are killed annually” (p. 112).
This is an interesting observation. While the globe population seeing that 1965 more than doubled, the number of animals slaughtered each year has multiplied by more than five times. Therefore , why are presently there so many starving people in the world then? Just isn’t the increase of livestock creation supposed to cure the number of starving people?
4. “Packaging materials, like plastic-type, are oil-based products that need energy to be created and therefore are responsible for emitting 24, 2 hundred tons of green house gas every single year” (p. 112).
This can be an interesting estimate because it take into account the fact that such simple things because the use of plastic packaging contributes so much to greenhouse emissions and thus to global warming. This reminds us that preserving the environment starts with every of us, within our daily activities such as eating.
five. “Today, almost eighty percent of the 2 . 5 mil farm workers in the United States had been born outside the Usa States” (p. 132).
We find this observation important. Many Americans generally complain about immigration but immigrants, because this offer reminds us, are supplying Us citizens with foodstuff they eat every day! So , why is generally there so much animosity toward immigrants these days?
1 ) “Agricultural personnel face a larger threat of suffering from pesticide-related illness than any other sector of society” (p. 143).
I find this interesting again. A lot of the agricultural staff in America are immigrants plus they expose themselves to the danger of poisoning more than any sector of society, yet at the same time immigrants are charged of a great deal evil today. They are sometimes described as a “threat” to American world!
2 . “Increased demand for beef, thanks to changing living specifications, has also altered food price structures and contributed to around the world food shortages” (p. 153).
This is interesting because the ever-growing number of people will be relying after fast food which has meat in it. Which is adversely affecting meals price structures and contributing to world hunger. And yet consuming McDonalds is known as “cool. “
3. “If you do trouble, you will arranged an example to get other people. If perhaps enough others bother, each one impacting on yet another in a chain reaction of behavioral modify, markets for all manner of green products and alternate technologies can prosper and expand” (p. 174).
This really is an interesting offer that stresses the importance of individual actions. No person action is definitely insignificant and individual responsibility should not be avoided by saying that one are unable to change the universe. This will remind of a renowned quote of Gandhi’s: “be the modify you want to find in the world. “
4. “The question is definitely, who determines what food is safe? Inside our society, the decisions are produced by the same type of people who decided in the Dred Jeff ruling that slaves weren’t human beings” (p. 186).
This is interesting because we normally rely on the safety of food about government and company regulators whereas these government bodies define each food while either “safe” of “unsafe” sometimes with regards to the profitability from the definition at a given time.
5. “Sometimes, the hardest element of learning something new is being aware of what questions to ask” (p. 197).
This is a unique comment. Being unsure of what inquiries to ask may lock their mind into a restricted part of inquiry, making it unable for one to know and understand larger issues.
1 . “Supermarkets provide a vital community service tend to be not cultural services companies. Their task is to offer as much foodstuff as possible” (p. 212).
This is an interesting quote since it reminds us that people cannot maintain supermarkets exclusively responsible for the unhealthy diet programs since grocery stores operate within business model, not only a social providers model. They cannot be expected to provide social services because all their main concern is maximizing earnings.
2 . “In a pattern