Finally, this sub-component also recognizes the growing issue associated with diversion of prescription medications into the dubious black market. The policy provides funding for methods to redress that issue by improved traffic monitoring of prescriptions for managed substances, such as the practice of “doctor shopping” sometimes accustomed to obtain legal prescriptions pertaining to controlled chemicals with the purpose of distributing them illegitimately for profit (USONDCP, 2004).
III. Disrupting the Market: Attacking the Monetary Basis of the Drug Trade: The third key component of the President’s medication policy features law enforcement and prosecution in a manner created to address the economic basis of the medicine trade. Particularly, the policy authorizes the two increased money as well as tactical reorganization of varied elements of the criminal justice system with respect to the illegal drug trade. In this regard, the policy stresses a priority concentrating on initiative created to identify and prosecute certain criminal companies and enterprises involved in the illegitimate drug trade (USONDCP, 2004).
Additionally , the policy provides funding and guidance for raising the ratio of U. S. prosecuting attorneys focused on the anti-drug issue in association with Arranged Crime Medication Enforcement Activity Forces (OCDETF) and both state and native law enforcement initiatives to interdict the supply from the illicit drug market. These ingredients of the policy include money of law enforcement fusion centers for the collection, analysis, and appropriate dissemination of necessary information associated with specific legal activity; elevated funding to get border safeguard services designed to interdict illegal drug smugglers before goods enter the region; and improved funding to get elements of the criminal proper rights system involved in identifying against the law funds and money transactions in order to dismantle criminal enterprises profiting from unlawful drug sales and inability to conform to U. S i9000. income tax laws (USONDCP, 2004).
Policy Evaluation:
Law enforcement takes on a crucial function in the President’s drug coverage. While additional aspects of the policy focus on treatment as well as the rehabilitation of offenders much more productive methods than incarceration, law enforcement operations are still the main means by which offenders arrive under the umbrella of any such program. The policy distinguishes between new (and other low-level) medicine users via those implicated in medicine sales and distribution.
The dual function of law enforcement officials is (1) to apprehend drug users in order to provide incentive for their non-reflex participation in beneficial drug abuse and treatment programs in lieu of incarceration; and (2) to improve pressure upon criminal corporations responsible for the distribution and sales of illegal prescription drugs into the U. S. black market. The apprehension of low-level drug dealers is usually delegated to local police authorities with increased federal financing, while government law enforcement and border protection law enforcement agencies address smuggling across U. S. edges and large household criminal companies involved in the division of drugs within the U. S i9000., respectively.
Similarly, the policy emphasizes the roles of schools and communities with respect to providing direction and consciousness to children at risk of experience of drug use before their exposure. This aspect of the policy acknowledges the deficiency of relying exclusively on a single or the other; instead, it provides funding and guidance to both school programs and communities so that their initiatives complement each other and complete where the different leaves off.
Criticism of Policy:
The most obvious criticisms from the policy is that (1) that utterly fails to address the discrepancy involving the manner in which the U. S. government doggie snacks legal drugs like liquor and smokes and illicit drugs. In principle, this discrepancy undermines the insurance plan because it counters its credibility, particularly because of the large lobbying occurrence of cigarette interests in Washington (Farwell, 2008).
Most likely more importantly, the policy basically neglects a defieicency of addressing the social issues that give rise to criminal activity of all sorts, including nevertheless hardly limited to illicit medication use. Particularly, the policy neglects the improvement of interpersonal factors, particularly in low-income/high-crime residential areas that often lead to increased vulnerability to illegitimate drug employ (Macionis, 2003).
Bibliography
Farwell, S. Gentleman Who Offers Tips on How to Prevent Arrest Is Running for Congress; the Dallas Early morning News (Mar. 3/08)
Macionis, J. (2003) Sociology ninth Edition. Nj: Prentice Corridor.
USONDCP (2004) the President’s National Drug Control Technique. Retrieved August 21