John george haigh circumstance case study

Forensic Evidence, Forensics, Internet Personal privacy, Serial Criminals

Excerpt via Case Study:

John George Haigh Case

George Haigh Case

The John George Haigh case was another death investigation case that set a significant benchmark inside the history of fatality investigations and its implications in the death research and future criminal trial world continue to resonate to the very time. This is true for several reasons plus some of the less obvious reasons will be assessed and talked about in this quick treatise.

The main one obvious point that this circumstance changed is that a body is not necessary to convict a criminal and this is even true once speaking of offences like killing and/or dramón killings like those fully commited by Haigh. Despite the body being disposed of, the huge batch of forensic evidence that implicated Haigh was considerable and even in the event that were not the case, the circumstantial evidence that pointed to Haigh was also quite damning, which is something that is usually potentially fewer obvious to several people. These part of that vein of thought will be discussed up coming.

One will not need to look too much in the recent past to get a high-profile circumstance where a physique was not present when an police arrest was drawn. The author of this report is usually referring to the murder in the United States of Idle Peterson at the hands of Scott Peterson. Lacy Peterson’s body was not found right up until April 2003, after the girl disappeared the prior December, but Scott Peterson was below suspicion a long time before then. Yet , the restoration body plus the extreme suspect items he previously on his person when he was arrested a few days later on were quite damning even though Lacy’s presence in the water had removed a lot of the forensic evidence. The things in Scott’s possession were nearly $15, 000 in cash, twelve pair of shoes, 200 blister packages of sleeping pills, a shovel, many credit cards belong to family members besides Scott and Lacy Peterson and so forth. Throughout the entire trial, only one item of forensic evidence was entered, that like a strand of hair present in a pair of giant pliers. The vast majority of evidence that resulted in the conviction was non-forensic and circumstantial in naturenot unlike the Haigh circumstance although the Haigh case a new lot more forensic evidence although no human body. The Peterson case was your other method around but both cases led to croyance and the Haigh case taking place is what generated convictions of men and women like Peterson possible (MurderPedia. org, 2013).

Even with the forensic proof, the newspaper trail that implicated Haigh, even if this did not confirm the killing, surely provide motive and opportunity because dead people tell zero tales which makes it all the more easier to rob from them. A definite pattern will be established between missing people and the fact that Haigh was robbing them blind therefore even if the forensic evidence was there, it will still most likely render a conviction (especially if it took place in modern times) as the correlation involving the deaths and the theft is simply too much of a coincidence to be explainable any other method.

It was not due to not enough effort, Haigh made it a spot to destroy people

Tweet