John is basing his decision purely on case study

Ethical Making decisions, Decision Making, The Decision, Smoking

Research from Example:

David is basing his decision strictly on consequentialism, while Mary’s point of view is more refined and contains both duty-based and rights-based points-of-view. Moral consequentialism focuses solely within the outcomes with the situation, that is why John is involved only with all the client’s smoking cigarettes status. To get John, receiving the client to quit is more significant than any other ethical aim. John is aware of also that the results of cigarette smoking are dangerous, which is an underlying cause for his ethical stance. Mary’s point-of-view is different. Though she sees John’s side, she also knows several items about moral decision-making. For one, both Martha and Ruben are wellness educators in a community medical center. As such, they are professionals and therefore are held to certain specifications. Their specialist status obliges them to work within ethical guidelines and legal frameworks. In other words, Martha and Steve have an obligation to fulfill all their professional responsibilities. Mary choose to find a way other than resting to help the consumer quit. In this manner, Mary harmonizes with a duty-based non-consequentialist framework. However , Mary also angles her decision on a rights-based ethical framework. Unlike John, Mary believes that all clients have the directly to truthful, appropriate, and honest information.

Ethical consequentialism is based on two fundamental principles. The very first is that the moral tenor of an act “depends only around the results of the act, inches and the second is that the “more good outcomes an work produces, the better or even more right that act, inches (BBC, 2014). In this case, Ruben works mostly with the former principle. The results of lying to the client will, at least in John’s head, be improved overall health prognosis to get the client. John cannot be sure that the “fear tactic” will work, but he believes it is worth a try since to refrain from using the dread tactic might lead to the client’s death. Ruben uses what is known as “expectable consequentialism, ” which presumes, “the morally right action is the action whose reasonably expectable outcomes are best, inches (Haines, d. d. ). Considering that it would be wrong to allow a client to die with out doing anything possible to avoid it, Steve bases his ethical thinking on a stringent consequentialist point-of-view.

Mary thinks that the benefits of their are health educators are absolutely important, if not she would certainly not be in this profession. Nevertheless , Mary bases her ethical reasoning upon duty-based and rights-based integrity. Both duty-based and

Tweet