Josiah faber re m8d1 routine activity theory

White Scruff of the neck Crimes, White colored Collar Criminal offenses, Cellular Phones, Examination Activity

Research from ‘Discussion and Results’ chapter:

Josiah Faber

RE: M8D1 Routine activity theory

I agree that to some extent there will always be some kind of crime with an individualized basis. Viewing offense solely like a social trouble rooted in poverty generally seems to ignore the lifestyle of white-collar crimes, which are generally perpetuated by individuals who have all of their basic material needs satisfied. However , I do think the concept of criminal offenses reduction has its own validity relating to some types of crime, such as selling drugs, which can be fostered by a culture of desperation and a lifestyle of criminality. I do not really think individualized therapy is necessitated, merely a better social support network for the indegent to prevent several types of crimes.

STEVE RHODES

LSO ARE: M8D1 Regimen activity theory

I agree that routine activity theory would not purport to become a broad, all-encompassing theory. It is merely 1 tool among many intended for law enforcement officials and members of the public to work with to engage in more effective criminal offense mitigation strategies. Striving to eliminate factors that make it easier to commit crimes can reduce the likelihood of the offense being determined in the first place. This is certainly obviously the very best case situation for the victim.

To work with inductive theory to explain the cellular phone model might be to see the conditions beneath which mobile phone theft is likely to take place (such as in congested areas, for instance , or during concerts or perhaps arenas with many distractions) and reduce the capability for those conditions to make it easier to interact in thievery, such as motivating people to continue to keep cellphones in front-lying carriers vs . packed in school bags where the mobile phones can be very easily accessed simply by thieves.

JEREMY TOMLIN

The example of observing how the occurrence of security cameras in London (or other forms of security monitoring) reduces offense is an excellent sort of applying routine activity theory in an inductive manner. Elevating law enforcement existence is often applied as a strategy to reduce crime. I likewise agree with the example regarding deductive applying the theory: the idea that increased on the web usage simply by teens will mean virtual lovato behaviors popular among the age group is based after the idea that behaviours common to young adults in actual life will be moved online, specifically given the absence of parental supervision.

JOSIAH FABER

M8D1

I differ that due to the fact there is the occurrence of an official this would quickly guarantee that the crime you mentioned will not have been determined: crimes do sometimes take place in the presence of security personnel. However , I do believe the theory advises on a basic basis, by creating conditions that boost the likelihood of detection, overall the speed of criminal offenses will lower. Your example of welfare fraud raises problem if certain types of crimes will be more or not as likely to be averted by program activity theory: because chaotic personal criminal offenses often happen to be irrational, prevention factors could have less of

Tweet