Logistic Planning and Collaboration in Complex Relief Operations simply by Steven L. Romano
It appears to me that Romano is definitely addressing his article for the Department of Defense (DOD) pointing out several issues in their humanitarian tasks that this individual thinks require addressing. I found the article large and intense, although it is lightened up, to some extent, by simply photographs. Nonetheless, I wondered how the photographs were linked to the issue available.
Romano is usually unhappy together with the way that the DODF conducts its education missions saying the DOD violates many logistical issues in their functions:
Most education assistance/disaster alleviation (HA/DR) functions are seen as a rapidly changing circumstances and a lack of very clear and accurate information; also, they are distinguished by substantial pressure to quickly provide relief supplies and materiel to an affected place.
Romano maintains that DOD does have “the airlift capacity, disaster funding, critical supplies, and logistics systems being an effective interagency partner in responding to these types of crises” and that they need to just exert even more effort in meeting the challenges which might be inherent within their humanitarian assistance/disaster relief (HA/DR) operations. This individual concludes which the experience of U. S. Western european Command in bringing relief in the Atlanta crisis of 2008 is made up of significant lessons for improving humanitarian response.
Critique of Article
If perhaps not for the abstract, I would have experienced a harder time understanding Roman’s content material and drift.
The positive facets of the article are that Pontificio uses photographs to verify and add curiosity to his essay. This individual also categorizes his factors according to headings and supplies a summary that informs us of the essay’s intentions. The summary is apparent, crisp, and to the point. Latino also talks about why he intends to use the Georgia humanitarian assistance crisis while example and, equally important, foresees possible criticism that the Georgian operation was “a fairly small operation compared to DOD’s support for the Indonesian tsunami in 2005. ” His reasons for, however, employing it include the reality the Georgian incident is microcosm for UN humanitarian education missions and pointing to ways of increasing the quests.
Romano principal points his content with information and each the first is thoroughly described. Details are substantiated with facts and figures. This, too, can be described as positive stage.
On the other hand, the photographs that Latino provides, even though interesting, leave out details why they are as part of the essay. Mention of the the photograph in the body in the work and reason or perhaps its introduction would have recently been helpful. My spouse and i