Mumia abu jamal article

Wesley Cook was created in 1954. While having been protesting by a George Wallace pertaining to

president move in late 1960s, several white-colored men bitten him. He claims that two men

grabbed him. One kicked his face and skull, while the other started him inside the

groin. Because the conquering progressed, this individual looked up and saw the two-toned

gold-trimmed pant lower-leg of a Phila. police officer. He yelled to get the

law enforcement, who saw him on a lawn being beaten to a pulp. A police officer

marched above briskly, and kicked him in the face. 1 I have been pleased to

that faceless policeman ever since, for he kicked me straight to the Black Panther

Get together. 2 Wesley Cook started to be a founding member of the Black Panther Partys

Philadelphia chapter in 1969 when justin was 15. After joining popular news

agencies in the 1970s, Wesley Cook improved his name to Mumia Abu-Jamal.

As a adolescent journalist, Jamal took the in testimonies about law enforcement officials

brutality. Jamal was known to be a rare ability of the airwaves journalism. He had a

strong intellect and a using empathy intended for poor people. He was known as a

skillful interviewer to become a well-known figure in local transmissions

journalism. Jamal appeared on National General public Radio, the National Dark Network

and native Philadelphia channels including WUHY-FM (now WHYY). He had a whole lot of

admiring friends in journalism and politics, together no previous record of crime or

violence. Irrespective of his personal connection with police brutality and years as a

teenage Black Panther, he stored his noises clean even under the microscopic lense of the

F and Phila. police cctv surveillance. By the later 1970s, Jamal was also

an ardent sympathizer and supporter of MOVE a black adepte

antiestablishment, antipolice group. He started wearing his hair in long

dreadlocks like a MOVE affiliate. By mid 1981, Jamals growing passion with

MANEUVER had sacrificed his ranking as a correspondent and expense him his job at WUHY.

He started freelancing his writing skills, while moonlighting as a cabdriver. He

was robbed while on duty together with his cab, thus he started to handle a gun. three or more During

this time around, the Phila. Police Department was therefore notorious pertaining to violence and

police violence, that the Usa Justice Division, in an unprecedented

1979 civil suit, charged then creciente (and ex – police commissioner) Frank Rizzo

and the leading police instruments with encouraging rampant law enforcement brutality, racism

and resting. This match was after dismissed in jurisdictional argument. 4 About

December 9, 1981, Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner was shot to death.

Upon July 3, 1982 Mumia Abu-Jamal was convicted of Officer Faulkners murder and

sentenced to death. Beyond these two facts, there are a number of versions of

the occurrences that lead to Mumia Abu-Jamals certainty. This newspaper will

assessment the happenings of 12 , 9, 81 and show that Mumia Abu-Jamal was not

provided a fair and impartial trial by his peers, and was mistakenly convicted and

sentenced for the fatality of Official Faulkner. What the Jury Read: On 12 , 9

81, at 3: 51 a. m. Expert Faulkner ceased Mr. William Cook (Jamals

brother), who was driving a Volkswagen Beetle for a targeted traffic violation, on the

south part of Locust Street regarding 80 toes east of 13th Road. The area in the

time was reputed for its seediness. The area had many late-night bars, discos

cafes, and streetwalkers. Police officer Faulkner radioed his area and then added:

On second thought, send me a lorry. 5 He was apparently intending to arrest

Mr. Cook or someone in Mr. At home cooks car for an unknown purpose. According to 2

prosecution witnesses, both Faulkner and Prepare food got away of their automobiles. Faulkner

spread-eagled Mr. Make across one of the cars and then suddenly turned and

slugged Officer Faulkner. Faulkner reacted by clubbing Cook several times with

his 17-inch torch. Mr. At home cooks face and neck were bloody once police

arrived. By chance, Mumia Abu-Jamal was left in his truck’s cab and left a

parking lot on the northeast corner of Locust and 13th. This individual accelerated coming from a

walk to a work as he charged toward Expert Faulkner across Locust Avenue. It was

hardly ever fully revealed at the trial, why Jamals cab was parked nearby. He merely

happened to be about. In any event, this is how the point empty shooting

started to occur. According to the prosecutions theory, Jamal happened to run up in back of

Officer Faulkner to inside one foot, and shot him in the back. The wounded

Faulkner turned around and returned open fire, hitting Jamal in the chest, and

falling onto his back. Jamal then emptied his gun into Police officer Faulkner for close

range, finishing him off using a shot among his eye. 6 Less than one-minute

later on, police attained the picture. The wounded Jamal was sitting on the curb several

feet via Faulkner, together with his empty shoulder holster on and his clear gun local.

Cook was standing a few feet apart against a wall, with what two witnesses

called, a peek of impact on his encounter. 7 He allegedly told police that he had

not do with all the shooting and was simply prosecuted pertaining to hitting Workplace

Faulkner. Around the surface, the prosecution provided a clean theory. The

prosecutions circumstance pointed into a clear legal conclusion that Jamal got committed

first-degree murder of the police officer which has a maximum word of loss of life.

However , together examines Mumia Abu-Jamal meant confession, the population

defenders deficiency of experience in capital killing cases, the changing accounts of

three eye witnesses, the physical evidence obtained at the picture, and

differences between the officers at the landscape, the clean prosecution theory

starts to disentangle. The Phila. police section themselves could of absent a

good way to demonstrating Jamals sense of guilt. For example , there were no conclusive match

among Jamals firearm and the bullet that slain Officer Faulkner. The police

could have tested Jamals hands to ascertain if he had recently fired a gun.

The officers on the scene, could of smelled the firearm barrel to ascertain if it

was recently terminated. 8 The Philadelphia law enforcement officials failed to go the extra mile in

evaluating the evidence in addition to doing so did not prove past a reasonable doubt

that Jamal was guilt ridden and deserved to be sentenced to fatality. The Admission:

Priscilla Oshawa, a clinic security guard and Officer Whilst gary Bell (Faulkners

former spouse and greatest friend) both swore that they heard Jamal, as he was

lying on the floor of the medical center emergency room certainly shout: I actually shot the

mother*censored*er, and i also hope the mother*censored*er drops dead. 9 Jamal contends

this confession was fabricated. The confession was allegedly shouted in

the emergency room whilst he was being detained by fifteen or so Philadelphia

cops. In fact , non-e of the officers present pointed out Jamalsconfession within their police information or selection interviews over the up coming few months.

Not really a word from the confession identified its way into any police statement for

more than two months. twelve Furthermore, it is extremely peculiar that the intelligent guy

whose livelihood depended on articulate communication might spontaneously and

flamboyantly incriminates himself. Priscilla Durham initially mentioned Jamalsconfession to police investigators in a February 9, 1982 interview, 62

days and nights after the capturing. She believed that your woman mentioned the confession to

hospital investigators the day after the murder, that has been, written straight down by

hands. Prosecutor McGill seemingly shocked, claimed to acquire never seen the

statement. While Ms. Durham was on the see stand through the trial, an unsigned

unauthenticated, typewritten document dated 12 , 10, 1981 was browse to

the jury and admitted while evidence against Jamal. 11 Officer Whilst gary Bell produced no

reference to Jamals admission in his information after the capturing. It was

not until 80 days after that Official Bell remembered the croyance. Officer

Bell explained that he was therefore devastated by simply seeing Police officer Faulkner along with his

face almost blown off that he did not keep in mind the admission. 12 Because of the

ineffectiveness of Jamals protection lawyer and the bias of Judge Sabo (the

presiding judge) the jury under no circumstances heard virtually any exculpatory data. Officer Gary

Wakshul, who had been in the terme conseillé wagon that took Jamal from the field to Jefferson

Hospital, reported later that morning that people stayed with you at

Jefferson until i was relieved. During this period, the Marrano male produced no

remarks. 13 Performed Officer Wakshul not notice the confession, or did he stage away

for a minute and miss that? While selecting Officer Wakshul on charges of

police brutality simply by Jamal, Expert Wakshul given a new assertion, 64 days and nights after

the murder (February 11, 1982). Officer Wakshul now claimed to hear the whole

confession loud and very clear. When asked by the job interviewer to explain his initial

survey, Officer Wakshul said that the statement disgusted me, and I did not

know it had any importance right up until today. 13 Judge Albert Sabo Jamals

defense group and proponents claim that Judge Sabo has sentenced more people to

death than some other judge in america. Therefore , the judge was biased

against Jamal in the first place, due to the mother nature of the alledged crime. However

the security team in search of a lso are trail, neglect to mention the frequent disruptive

nature of Mr. Jamal during his trial. The reality is that Judge Sabo has been a

sitting evaluate since mid 1970s. During his tenure, he has almost exclusively presided

over capital murder circumstances. Therefore , if Judge Sabo has presided over more

capital abuse trials than any other sitting down judge in the United States, it

would be due to his tenure as being a judge certainly not his tendency. The fact more death

fees and penalties have been released from Evaluate Sabos courtroom is not only a function of Judge

Sabo but individuals juries in case. 15 Under the system of rights

used in Pennsylvania, the judge does not word the accused to fatality. A court

of 12 citizens listen to the evidence resistant to the accused and after that must make a decision

unanimously to impose the death sentence. In this case, Evaluate Sabo did not

sentence Jamal to fatality, the racially mixed group of 12 jurors, which Jamal

assisted in selecting performed. This decision was later on upheald by the Pennsylvania

Best Court in direct appeal. 16 The court transcripts and charm court

decisions uphold the very fact that Assess Sabo was eminently fair and individual with

Jamal during his trial. This individual frequently was disruptive during the trial which

resulted in various delays. Anybody can only think about how the actions of Jamal during

his trial adversly influenced the jury because they sat sequestered in a lodge for

six weeks. Judge Sabo defends him self by stating, In the old days we all lawyers

had a saying: For those who have the evidence working for you, argue the evidence. If you

have the law on your side, argue what the law states. And if you could have neither the evidence

or the law on your side, scream like hell. Now this news media has evolved that

to learn: If you dont have the evidence and also the law on your side: blame the

judge. Whom else will you blame it on? 18 The Jury: Jamals

followers and defense team have got claimed during the appeal process that the jury

was racially stacked against the defendant, breaking his municipal rights. During

the 1982 trail, Judge Sabo encouraged the protection to note the race of each

prospective juror so it may become section of the public record. Unfortunatly

the defense failed to do it. Therefore there is absolutely no record to verify or support

how a large number of prospective jurors for the 1982 path were grayscale of that amount

how lots of the prosecutions 15 preemptory difficulties to excuse jurors had been

used against eligible dark-colored jurors. This really is unfortunate seeing that during this component

of the trial, Mr. Jamal was performing as his own legal professional during the collection

process. Having demanded to symbolize himself, Jamal assumed the obligation

of asking prospective juror what their particular race was and remembering it in the writing of

the record. The Philadelphia Supreme The courtroom has reviewed the evidence and ruled

that Jamals municipal rights were upheld. The reality clearly show that in the

beginning of the trial, 3 or perhaps the 12 jurors seated had been black. Once one of the

dark jurors, Ms. Jenny Dawley, violated sequestration to attend to a sick kitten

the security as well as the criminal prosecution agreed to her removal. The defense statements

that the assess provided a white juror special plans who needed to take a

municipal service examination, and has not been as versatile for the Ms. Dawley. The facts

plainly indicate the fact that white juror had asked the all judges permission prior to

taking the check. Ms. Dawley did not communicate with the assess or any court

officers regarding her cat. Ms. Dawley while below sequesture with the hotel

just chose to move and take care of her cat. The lady was advised by the courtroom that your woman

could not merely leave, and responded per the public record, I dont care

what Judge Sabo or anyone says, I really do what I have to do, nobody will probably stop

me. Ms Dawley chose to break her sequestration without requesting the assess to

cater to her personal needs. The record as well shows that both defense and

prosecution decided to her dismissal. In short, the 1982 court that Mr. Jamal

helped select was properly selected and sitting down. The ethnic mix of the jury was

almost the same to that of Philadelphia during the time. The criminal prosecution had 4

(4) preemptory challenges left when the court was finally seated. If the

prosecution experienced desired, that they could of used these remaining challenges to

exclude the three dark jurors that have been seated. The court transcripts verify

that every of the jurors dismissed by the prosecution had been dismissed for valid

non-racial reasons. 18 The Witnesses Both the protection and prosecution have a

litany of witnesses. Over the years, many of these witnesses have transformed their

tales. A few of the witnesses have recorded sworn affidavits that the law enforcement

coerced them into producing false statements to support the prosecutions claims.

The defense witnesses contend that a third person was present through the routene

traffic stop by Police officer Faulkner. This kind of third person was in charge of shooting

Expert Faulkner and after that fled by walking. This operating man theory is the

simply theory at any time presented within the record that purports to demonstrate Mr. Jamals

innocence. 19 This section will try to identify most key witnesses for both the

prosecution and the defense and analyize their statements individually. The

defense promises that Veronica Jones is known as a key eyesight witness to overturning the

murder certainty. The night of the murder, Ms. Jones was obviously a prostitute operating

the neighborhood about 13th and Locust. Ms. Jones at first told the police

that she had observed two guys run in the scene by which Officer Faulkner was

taken, but transformed her story after receiving threats and promises via two

Phila. detectives. Ms. Jones was a mother of two during the time and was

facing criminal offence charges of welfare scams and was later convicted of these felony

charges. Nevertheless Ms. Smith testified in 1982 that the lady did not start to see the actual

shooting. She mentioned that the lady was doing work the street throughout the cornor and did

certainly not look down the street until following the shooting stopped. When your woman looked

throughout the cornor, she saw two men kinda jogging away from the crime

picture. Ms. Smith has never testified that these two men were involved in the

criminal offense in any way. twenty-one Today, Ms Jones says in a sworn affidavit that she offered

false account under pledge against Jamal. She claims that at the time of the

trial, she was coerced by the police to lye. In her statement, Ms. Roberts states

that approximatly one week before the trial she was visited simply by two white plain

clothed detectives. The detectives started by discussing Mr. Jamal rather than the

facts of the case. That they told her that if the lady testified at the trial and

identified Jamal as the shooter, she would not have to worry about her future

pending felony charges. The girl claims to of told the investigators at the time that

she did not see the shooting, but only heard the shots. The detectives are not

satified with this response and reminded Ms. Williams that the girl faced a long prison

sentence in your essay if convicted. She sensed at the time that if she did not testify against

Mister. Jamal, she’d never find her children again and spend several years in

prison. Ms. Smith also says in her sworn statement that through the trial the two

detectives had been in ordinary view, standing up at the rear of the courtroom. Debra

Kordansky is yet another defense eyewitness that is at the bedroom of her apartment

down the street from the crime picture. She read all five shots nevertheless thought they will

were firecrackers so your woman did not look out her home window until the police arrived about

the landscape. She observed ten team cars and two vehicles and a male running around the South

side of Locust Street. twenty-two Mr. Desie Hightower testified in 1982 that he was down

the street from the shooting, in back of a building in a building, getting into a

car together with his friend. Just like Ms. Kordansky, Mr. Hightower initially believed the

shooting was a child lighting firecrackers. Mr. Hightower testified that he would

not have a direct line of vision to the criminal offenses scene because he had searched for cover

lurking behind a wall when the firing started and then remained right now there until the

taking pictures stopped. Having waited until quite some time after the shooting stoped

before searching the corner towards the crime landscape, he explained that this individual saw

an individual running from your general part of the shooting. Mr. Hightower provides

never testified or mentioned that the person he observed running in the scene was the

shooter or involved in the criminal offense in any way. It should be noted that Mr.

Hightowers 1982 description from the person this individual saw operating after the law enforcement officials

arrived was an exact blend of Mr. Jamal the morning of the shooting and Mr.

Hightower got no explanation for this simple fact. Furthermore, Mr. Hightower was handed

a polygraph test in the testimony and passed. Bill Singletary was obviously a secondary

eyewitness for the defense. He not only was present at the crime field the night

of the murder, he had a long debate with one of many presiding officers.

However , this individual did not testify in the initial trial but was called simply by Judge Sabo

during the 95 appeal of the decision. Later in 1996, Mister. Singletary was called

the important thing witness in the 1996 HBO documentary within the Jamal trek. He explained that

he saw two shooters. The first shot Officer Faulkner in the as well as then

steered clear of down the street. The 2nd gunman stepped out of the car Officer

Faulkner pulled over (Jamals brother), taken the wounded officer hard

threw the gun aside, and happened to run away. In that case according to Singletary, while Mr. Jamal

approached Official Faulker to offer assistance, Officer Faulkner elevated his hands

and taken Mr. Jamal in the breasts. Mr. Singletary went on to say that this individual

personally got into contact with Officer Faulkner and observed him declare Get Maureen, get the

children. Maureen is actually Officer Faulkners wifes 1st name, nevertheless

they never had any kind of children. Mister. Singletarys account does raise some

interesting questions. The prosecution and defense medical experts both

decided that Officer Faulkner passed away immediately coming from his mind wound. Performed Mr.

Singletary actually talk with Officer Faulker? How did Mr. At home cooks mystery

traveling get posession of Mr. Jamals weapon, out of its holster, and capture

Officer Faulkner in the mind? How was Officer Faulkner shot inside the back?. Was

there an additional man (mystery man) in Mr. At home cooks car? If there was an additional man

in Mr. At home cooks (Jamals brother) car, why hasnt Mr. Cook come forward? Mr.

Cook provides stated pertaining to the record many times that he had nothing to do with all the

murder of Officer Faulkner and features refused to testify during the trial. Mr.

Singletary as well swears that he was accepted in the Phila. Police

Hq (Roundhouse) at 4am around the morning in the shooting and released for

9am. During this time period he was interogated and endangered by a dark Philadlephia

authorities detective. Mister. Singletary statements he provided a handwritten version from the

mornings situations, and once it absolutely was reviewed by the detective it absolutely was balled up and

thrown away. Finally discouraged, the meeting with detective entered up his own

variation of the situations that morning hours and demanded that Mister. Singletary indication the

typed document. Worrying for his safety, Mister. Singletary claims he unwillingly

signed the typed law enforcement officials version in the mornings incidents. Mr. Singletary also

says that the authorities treatened him at his place of business, house windows of his

gas place were regularly broken by police, which his towing vehicles were mentioned

for quite a few violations. He claimed in the HBO documented that the claimed

intimidation became so oppressive that having been forced to abandon his organization in

Phila. and keep town, shifting to South Carolina. There are many

inconsistancies with Mister. Singletarys affirmation. Log ebooks at the Philadelphia

Police Head office indicate that Mr. Singletary signed him self in and out of

the roundhouse. He was not questioned with a black investigator as he statements, the

records show Mister. Singletary was interogated with a white private investigator with less than

eight months experience. It is impossible to prove or perhaps disprove weather conditions or not he

was threatened by a detective with less than 8-10 months encounter. Both the

prosecution and defense agree that Robert Chobert was an actual eyewitness to

the taking pictures and one of many closest visitors to the offense. When he was 18

yeas old, Mr. Chobet was paid to throw a molotov cocktail into an empty school

building. He pleaded no tournament to the charges and was placed on probation. The

nights Officer Faulkners murder, Mr. Chobert was parked inside the taxi having been

driving 35 feet behind Officer Faulkners police car. He swore in the 1982

trail and 1995 appeal that this individual saw Mister. Jamal blast Officer Faulkner and did not

take his eyes off from Jamal until he was imprisoned and put into the police truck.

The protection claims that Mr. Chobert was driving a car his taxi cab without a valid drivers

certificate and that the Assistant DA Mister. McGill had an agreement with Mr. Chobert

that he would arrange to get his license in return to get favorable testimony.

Mr. Chobert confirmed during his mil novecentos e noventa e seis testimony that back in 1982, he do ask

the DA on how he could get his certificate back. 13 years after the shooting

and testimony of Mr. Chobert, he continue to does not have got his motorists license again

due to his limited source of funds, nevertheless has been in order to continue driving a car a

cab. Four people, Michael Scanlon, Cynthia White, Robert Harkins, and

Albert Magelton every provided testimony for the prosecution. All four witnesses

were unquestionably present during the shooting, eyewitnesses towards the murder, and

have been deemed credible by the court. Michael Scanlon was visiting

Philadelphia from away of point out and was sitting in his car on the intersection of

13th and Locust and witnessed the whole murder, beginning to end. Mister.

Scanlon testified extensively with the 1982 trek and proved that Bill Cook

attacked Officer Faulkner. He proceeded to testify that the official reacted to Mr.

At home cooks attack trying to subdue Mr. Cook. While this was going on, another gentleman

came running out from the building across the street towards the officer and

Mr. Prepare in front of the authorities car. Mr. Scanlon saw Jamals palm raise and

heard a gunshot. Then a officer chop down down on the sidewalk and Mister. Jamal walked

over and shot the police officer two further times at point bare range. An additional

prostitute functioning Locust streets that night was Cynthia White. Ms. White-colored

testified that she was across the street inside the parking lot after i noticed

Mister. Jamal running out of the great deal and pretty much on the suppress when he taken two

times at Expert Faulkner in the back. The officer overturn and staggered

and seened like having been grabbing to get something but fell. In that case Jamal came on top

in the officer and shot him some more. After it was all over, Jamal slouched

down and sat around the curb. Reliable Eyewitness Albert Magelton was obviously a pedestrian

walking across the area of thirteenth and Locust approximatley 20 yards

from your shooting. Whilst testifying more than 20 years ago to what he previously witnessed Mr.

Magelton explained, I noticed the gentleman (Jamal) coming from the parking lot.

He was moving across the street to where the official had stopped the

Vw. I noticed shots and i also did not see the Officer any more. I proceeded

back across the street to see what happened to the Official. And then,?nternet site was

shifting across the street, I actually looked to where We heard the shots. When I got to the

pavement, I actually looked down and found the Police officer lying presently there. I did not view the other

man (Jamal) right up until I moved up better and found him sitting on the reduce.

Under oath in 1982, once asked by Assistant D. A. May well McGil what the police performed

with the person who was sitting down on the curb next towards the dead Police officer. Mr. Magelton

responded that they can handcuffed Jamal and put him in the lorry. One of the

representatives on the scene then got Mr. Magelton over to the wagon and asked him if

this was the guy that he had seen obtaining the street. Mr. Magelton

proved his history under pledge and there is simply no evidense the fact that defense of Mr.

Jamal has at any time challenged his testimony. Mr Robert Harkins was an additional cab

drivers placed immediately across the street in the crime landscape. Like Mister.

Chobert, Mr. Harkins was very close for the actual capturing and witnessed the

complete crime. Mister. Harkins gave a statement towards the officers around the scene

credit reporting the prosecutions theory. In his statement coming from 1981, Mr Harkins explained

that, I actually looked over and observed a police officer get a guy, the guy spun

around and the officer traveled to the ground. He had his practical the ground and

then thrown over at this time and the male who was position over the police officer

pointed that gun at the official and fired one shot after which he dismissed a second shot.

At this time the officer transferred a little then went smooth to the floor. I

noticed a total of three photographs and observed what appeared to be three flashes from the

gun of the man standing in the officer. Regardless of this fact, Mr. Harkins is definitely

in the exclusive position of having neither the defense nor prosecution phone him to

testify on the 1982 trial. However , Mister. Harkins was asked by the defense to

testify at the 1995 charm trial. Mister. Harkins mentioned under oath during the 95

trial that he had recently been repeatedly bothered by Mr. Jamals investigators

between 1990 and July of 1995. He continued to say, that there were many people

that came around, numerous people that would venture to my personal place of work, and

then call up me at my home. Everytime Mr. Harkins refused approach the defense

team. Finally after 13 years of keeping his quiet, Mr. Harkins

finally sucummed to the defenses pressure and agreed to give a statement to

one of Mr. Jamals investigators. After this individual gave his statement the defense staff

continued to make contact with him. Underneath oath in the 1995 trial, Mr. Harkins explained

that every time I might say something to the security, they would come back

with different things than what We said. I actually dont that way. Regarding the

witnesses of this trial, it is crystal clear that several prosecution witnesses: Scanlon

White colored, Chobert, and Magelton, almost all gave virtually the exact same account.

Furthermore, the person that defense witness Harkins describes as having shot

Officer Faulkner and then lay down on the curb, who had been later apprehended by

authorities was Munia Abu-Jamal. Observe credability can be described as major aspect in this case.

You will discover four eyewitnesses for the defense that claim there was clearly a third person

at the field of the offense or a traveling in the Vw? Pamela Jenkins

Cynthia White colored was a crucial witness to get the prosecution, due to the fact that the lady

was the just witness who also testified to seeing Jamal with a gun in his hands. No

various other witness promises to have noticed Jamal which has a gun. It may also be observed

Cynthia White has disappeared and can not be found by defense. Not any other

witness the morning from the shooting can recall seeing her that morning. It seems like

that only the prosecution plus the Philadelphia law enforcement now of Cynthia White wines

exact whereabouts. Following Jamals conviction, Ms. White continued to function

the streets under law enforcement officials protection. The girl was arrested many times after the trial

and all charges had been dismissed, or a plea good deal was resolved. Pamela Jenkins

recently came forward intended for the protection. Apparently, Ms. Jenkins was working as being a

prostitute in the evening and realized Cynthia White very well. Ms. Jenkins likewise knew a

number of Phila. police officrs at the time and was dating Officer Jones

Ryan. Ms. Jenkins features provided a sworn statement that Police officer Ryan asked her to

testify against Jamal and falsely recognize Mumia while the shooter, in spite of

the fact she wasnt even present during the shooting. Her statement went on to

say that Officer Ryan paid her $150 to help Ms. White and that the police place

pressure in Ms. Light to lay at the Mumia trial. Can be Ms. Jenkins testimony and

statement reputable after all these kinds of years? Seems like the government has used Ms.

Jenkins as a celebrity witness in a police data corruption case in Philadelphia. Too

trial, Ms. Jenkins revealed how the Philadelphia police used her to provide

fraudulent data to obtain a homicide conviction against Raymond Carter. Ms.

Jenkins testified that Officer Jones Ryan paid her $250 to testify against

Carter.

Tweet