Nursing that folks employed within just data

Inferential Statistics, Breastfeeding Career, Assisted living facilities, Spss

Excerpt from ‘Data Analysis’ phase:

594

1 . 409

N

Understanding

Pearson Relationship

. 117

you

Sig. (2-tailed)

. 128

Quantity of Squares and Cross-products

42054. 186

Covariance

1 . 409

And

There is no statistically significant relationship between regarding the participator and the self-assessed knowledge regarding the use of computers.

Descriptive Statistics

Mean

Std. Deviation

In

Gender

1 ) 92

. 274

Experience

three or more. 87

1 . 463

Correlations

Gender

Encounter

Gender

Pearson Correlation

1

-. 246**

Sig. (2-tailed)

. 001

Sum of Potager and Cross-products

12. 860

-16. 872

Covariance

. 075

-. 099

N

Encounter

Pearson Relationship

-. 246**

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

. 001

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

-16. 872

Covariance

-. 099

2 . a hundred and forty

N

**. Correlation is usually significant on the 0. 01 level (2-tailed).

There is a statistically significant relationship between the male or female of the player and their self-assessed degree of knowledge relating to the ability regarding and use of personal computers. Women (f=2) outnumber males astronomically within this sample, as such this effect is highly prejudiced and should not be taken to stand for male as well as female pc experience in the nursing career.

Descriptive Statistics

Mean

An std. Deviation

D

Gender

1 . 92

. 274

Usage

sixty two. 41

12-15. 492

Correlations

Gender

Consumption

Gender

Pearson Correlation

one particular

-. 038

Sig. (2-tailed)

. 625

Amount of Squares and Cross-products

12. 860

-27. 302

Covariance

. 075

-. 160

N

Utilization

Pearson Relationship

-. 038

1

Sej. (2-tailed)

. 625

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

-27. 302

41041. 512

Covariance

-. 160

N

You cannot find any statistically significant correlation involving the gender in the participant and their self-assessed level of computer usage either at work or at your home.

Descriptive Figures

Mean

Std. Deviation

And

Gender

1 ) 92

. 274

Knowledge

62. 63

12-15. 682

Correlations

Gender

Expertise

Gender

Pearson Correlation

you

-. 036

Sig. (2-tailed)

. 643

Sum of Potager and Cross-products

12. 860

-26. 209

Covariance

. 075

-. 153

N

Understanding

Pearson Relationship

-. 036

1

Sej. (2-tailed)

. 643

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

-26. 209

42054. 186

Covariance

-. 153

N

There is absolutely no statistically significant correlation between gender with the participant and their self-assessed amount of knowledge concerning computers and their usage.

Detailed Statistics

Suggest

Std. Deviation

N

Male or female

1 . 92

. 274

Classes

1 . 73

1 . 511

Correlations

Male or female

Courses

Sexuality

Pearson Relationship

1

-. 040

Sej. (2-tailed)

. 603

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

12. 860

-2. 826

Covariance

. 075

-. 017

N

Courses

Pearson Correlation

-. 040

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

. 603

Total of Squares and Cross-products

-2. 826

Covariance

-. 017

installment payments on your 282

D

There is no statistically significant relationship between player gender as well as the number of training they required towards increasing their computer proficiency and/or knowledge.

Descriptive Statistics

Indicate

Std. Change

N

Training

1 . 73

1 . 511

Experience

three or more. 87

1 . 463

Correlations

Courses

Experience

Courses

Pearson Correlation

one particular

. 047

Sig. (2-tailed)

. 541

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

seventeen. 715

Covariance

2 . 282

. 104

N

Experience

Pearson Correlation

. 047

1

Sej. (2-tailed)

. 541

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

17. 715

Covariance

. 104

installment payments on your 140

In

There is no statistically significant correlation between the number of courses a participant had taken and their self-assessed experience level with pcs.

Descriptive Stats

Mean

Std. Deviation

In

Courses

1 . 73

1 . 511

Consumption

62. forty one

15. 492

Correlations

Classes

Usage

Training

Pearson Correlation

1

. 131

Sig. (2-tailed)

. 087

Sum of Pieces and Cross-products

Covariance

2 . 282

a few. 059

N

Usage

Pearson Correlation

. 131

1

Sej. (2-tailed)

. 087

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

41041. 512

Covariance

3. 059

N

There is absolutely no statistically significant correlation between number of classes participants required and the volume of computer system usage they will indicated.

Detailed Statistics

Mean

Std. Change

N

Training

1 . 73

1 . 511

Knowledge

62. 63

12-15. 682

Correlations

Courses

Know-how

Courses

Pearson Correlation

you

. 150*

Sej. (2-tailed)

. 050

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

Covariance

2 . 282

3. 547

N

Know-how

Pearson Correlation

. 150*

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

. 050

Sum of Squares and Cross-products

42054. 186

Covariance

several. 547

N

*. Relationship is significant at the 0. 05 level (2-tailed).

There is also a significant great correlation between the number of training taken and self-assessed computer knowledge. The more computer programs a player took, a lot more generally experienced they were about computers and computer utilization.

Above can be described as chart describing the rate of recurrence distribution of self-assessed hurdles to laptop usage as well as the application of computer-based courses to continued specialist development. (See Appendix a for statistical Data)

Appendix a

*insert your summary tables in this article. Because I have to submit in

Tweet