Person freedom and rights essay

“Is it most important to value one’s own lifestyle, happiness and interest as well as to obey the greater authority from the state? ” This statement raises problem of the person’s freedom and rights in comparison to the state’s control over individual’s life. In this conventional paper I will be fighting against Socrates and Confucius view of placing the state ahead of the person. This paper is made along my line of protection which examines the issues and arguments around the individual independence and legal rights.

This debate largely dwells on the idea of freedom from Socratic and Confucius philosophy, Christianity and individual flexibility and also modern/postmodern thinking within this subject.

The concept of freedom and rights in ancient Greek Viewpoint

Socrates and Confucius are two significant philosophers whom tried to develop the relationship between the individual independence, rights and the state control (Philosophy research guide). In accordance to Beck “both Confucius and Socrates lived in cultures where hereditary privilege was the main aspect in social status.

Nor of them was extremely high-born, but they absolutely were not cowboys either” (Beck 2010: 14). Socrates led much in political debate, he would not engage in personal career. Having been so much worried about how state laws were implemented in city life style, which determined a healthy marriage between the residents and the point out. However , this kind of relationship really should not be forced or coerced with them rather it will come the natural way.

Both Socrates and Confucius teachings’ had been meant to put together men intended for the world of national politics. This is why they will both “stressed the value and importance of beliefs and portrayed the ideal point out in the midst of various prevailing governments which were far from perfect. They criticized all their unjust techniques and clinically diagnosed their problems. Socrates has gone in to more detail in delineating the several types of government” (Beck 2010: 7). But Confucius went additional by educating about the value of personal control and temperature. That taught about the values of social controls and proper behavior.

Beck keeps that “for Socrates as well as the Greeks personal behavior was focused even more on the person as his own responsibility of self-discipline and would not extend thus strongly in the social milieu. The rules of propriety had been designed to bring harmony in relationships, when temperance is involved with the a harmonious relationship within the individual” (Beck 2010: 5 ). This displays how individual freedom and rights played an important position in the brain of the Greeks. Of course , the state of hawaii is important although too is definitely individual freedom. However , both men emphasized the need for progression of knowledge. This knowledge shall be taught in schools and public locations.

Confucian philosophy it today, being used in The japanese, Korea and China. This puts very much emphasis on learning and educational beliefs but imitating the learn teacher’s words and deeds. Education is definitely therefore , being utilized to correct several unbecoming patterns from the ethical perspectives (Philosophy study guide). The values of Confucius philosophy has become translated in to human patterns and principles in the Asian societies. Taking the lessons from the Socratic and Confucius ideology, this viewpoint emphasizes the requirement to practice advantage and temp at all times, as a result avoiding chaffing and rash actions (Beck, 2010).

Christianity and specific rights

Christianity was born in Palestine in the time Roman colonial rule. The relationship between Christianity and the Express was relatively not healthy, as these two agencies often mixed both in basic principle and practice. Being a Roman Citizen during the time would combine many responsibilities and tasks which one necessary to follow. Nevertheless , the Romans were thought to be atheists for insistence on emperor worship. Roman Residents were instructed by the rules to widely follow and worship the cultic figures that showed the Roman gods. This worship was characterized through private and public worship and giving of sacrifices (Stumbaugh & Balch, 1996) in special locations and temples.

However , for several years intellectuals and philosophers began to question this cultic praise. Roman Individuals were needed to perform a few rituals, prayers and sacrifice to firm their worship. Through this worship all citizens were obliged to affirm their very own allegiance towards the emperor. Christian believers refused to adhere to the demands in the state to follow along with the worship of demi gods of Roman beliefs. As a result, this kind of refusal resulted in the persecution of Christians who insisted in worshipping their only God and Lord Christ. Christians made a decision to live in distinct set of life style which is different from the spiritual institutions of the Roman Disposition and its sociable environment.

This kind of shows the unhealthy relationship between the condition and the cathedral. This forced the Apostle Paul to deal with the issue of obeying the state laws and regulations and control in the Romans Chapter 13. The divine right of rulers has been disputed and discussed through the years. The question often asked is whether Christians are obliged to follows point out laws and regulations. How long should Christian believers go to obey the regulations of the condition even when it truly is against their particular religion? For many years, Christian theologians and theologians have attempted to grapple with all the concept of the State and the Church. There are individuals who believe that the Church and State happen to be mere attributes of the same endroit and therefore, Cathedral leaders must be involved resort the affairs of the Point out. This view was generally developed by theologians such as Matn Luther, Zwingli and Steve Calvin (Stumbaugh & Balch, 1996).

It truly is through this theological thought that all led to State Churches including the Church of England and Lutheran Churches that are frequently found in the Scandinavian countries. On the other hand, there are those theological views which will holds that Church is usually supreme in the State since it subscribes towards the higher heavily powers. It truly is this keen authority which makes many chapels to argue that they can subjected to divine power rather than state control. Those theologians who subscribes to this thought argue that the State is in additional position to Church. Through out the Middle Age groups, the Roman Catholic Church view produced the notion that Church and State has to be separate or perhaps remain individual entities. This kind of thought as well advocates that State and Church that has to not just stay separate yet is also impartial of one one other (Bramsted, 1978).

Most of theologians hold the view that Cathedral and Point out different agencies and have different origins. The Church is in debt for its beginning and devotion to The almighty and therefore Christian followers ought to express their allegiance from God. Although the State, is viewed as the work institution that is put in place simply by God pertaining to human Contemporary society to physical exercise power and authority of human beings. Yet , the Church has no control over men, although can only appeal to their brains, hearts and consciences. Consequently, those who have approved to be beneath the rule with the Church need to adhere to Cannon laws, regulations (Stumbaugh & Balch, 1996). In this case, the church could exercise power over them, control their particular behavior patterns, thoughts and lives. The Church also offers the power to fix, admonish and even discipline people who contrary to the guidelines of their trust.

The concept of liberty and rights in modern day European viewpoint

Modernity is considered to be the period between 1750 to late 1960s. The development of ideas in the western world is closely connected with the philosophical thoughts of their day. This era was connected with enlightenment thought often linked to scientific improvement, technological growth and professional revolution. This new thinking permeated social thinking, values and relations. A single those of these philosophers who contributed significantly to the development of enlightenment considering in relation to individual freedom and rights were Jean Jacques Rousseau. Jean Jacques Rousseau, who were living between 1772 to 1778, is among those philosophers who also committed his life to follows the best of liberty during his political job. He followed the personal line of republican persuasions and sympathized together with the Republican values. He contended that the associated with western world corrupted the goodness of human nature (Friend, 2004).

He emphasized that progress in the arts and sciences written for moral degeneration and the corrosion of modern societies. He contended that human beings existed mainly because they live social groups that afterwards produced inequality. And therefore, once people begins to are in fixed relationships like interpersonal groups, the quest for independence begins to emerge because they want to free themselves from social bondages and oppressive social contracts. Consequently , this is the commencing of social inequalities and oppressions. Concerning Civil Society, Rousseau argues that it was founded by the person or folks who emerged simply by enclosing people in teams. Then it said ownership over the piece of land. Consequently , civil society has been utilized by individuals to rationalize and maintain contact in house, which is depending on inequality and associated meaningful decays (Friend, 2004).

Nevertheless , although people have the will to decide on what is right for them, it is important for everybody to put aside their particular personal and ethno-cultural passions for the common good of others. Although, the concept of common goal is important, the majority of scholars believe it brings about a form of int�gral leadership or perhaps authoritarian leadership. It also causes dictatorship in the majority. The other European who developed this concept in the rights of man can be Thomas Paine. He strongly suggested for the rights of man theory was about the defense in the Principles of French Wave.

The various other philosopher whom contributed to the introduction of individual liberty was Thomas Pain. In respect to Paine, human beings happen to be born with equal, man rights though they do not live isolation with others inside the society. Every human being provides the right to reside in freedom and revel in the benefits of assistance with other folks in the contemporary society. However , this is simply not often recognized, in our communities because these types of principles in many cases are violated mainly because human beings are certainly not perfect. They may have imperfect and naturally deprived nature that usually wants to carry out evil.

Paine argued therefore , that the all-natural rights of most people can simply be properly secured when people figure out how to deposit individuals rights which they cannot maintain as specific human beings. Nevertheless, the state gets the overall of the individual’s lifestyle especially when considering addressing the problems of assault against mankind. The state also has the overall privileges over the protection against the damage of others. To him, it is only the state which has the require to ensure the stability of our communities. This means that a legitimate government has to be based on the concept of people rule for the sake of the people (Friend, 2004). This type of government is what is often refereed to as democracy. It is only the democratic federal government that can be regarded as a legitimate form of government which represents the rights of the people. Democratic governments were made to defend and protect the rights of individual people and safeguarded the security of most citizens (Bramsted, 1978).

The idea of freedom and rights in the post modern day world opinions

Much of the european culture resulted from the matrix of the enlightenment period. This promoted the attitude of tolerance toward others and relative look at towards perception of any time. The Enlightenment doctrine promoted then doctrine of individuality, purporting that people are free, emancipated and need to act in autonomy. The basic principles democracy is based on the idea of government consent, in other words, it really is about people centered authorities that is elected by people for the folks. The power directed at people derives from the electorates. The concept of person rights to freedom provides attracted a lot criticism from the intellectual neighborhoods and philosophers. The Marxist philosopher states that the rights of individual go despite social progress because they are certainly not in line with ethnic or historical relativity (Bramsted, 1978).

Postmodernism rejected the enlightenment landscapes that characterized much of then simply 18th to 19th 100 years. Post modernism promoted the notion of pluralism, individualism and relativism. It rejected the notion of one green print or overall dominating theme that dictates the thinking of person. Instead, this calls for the plural sort of human relationships. It opposes the notion of meta-narratives and calls for one particular many narratives in expanding human story. Contrary to the Enlightenment theory, post modernism problems this concept of development or perhaps progress or the so called notion of forward match of the past. Therefore , the guidelines of justice, freedom and rights inside the postmodern world view are incredibly much fragmented. It is also socially constructed depending on the social, economical, cultural and political situations. The World western mostly work out liberalism which can be based on freedom and legal rights of specific human beings. This is exactly why post modernism is often in loggerhead with modern enlightenment theory (Bramsted 1978).

Nevertheless , the Tolerante individualism which usually subscribes to Liberal democracy promotes the ideals of civil and political liberties. Civil liberty is big movement in the united states that demands for the rights of Citizens. The theory of legal rights advocates pertaining to the legal rights of others as well as as their own. Such rights include existence and freedom of others. This kind of view has created into man rights movement that considered centre level in the world of national politics advocating to get universal human rights. Liberalism emphasizes the significance of universal flexibility and multicultural citizenship. This view argues that individuals should display unique commitment for their personal lives but not to enforce these people others. Civil liberties as well argue that the government has no right to infiltrate into their personal lives. This means that many of us have the rights to live a peaceful and free existence without disturbance from the state (Bramsted, 1978).

Personal View

Freedom is usually some thing which in turn we all treasure and keep hold of ideally. But individual freedom is a thing that is socially constructed. The concept of freedom have been misinterpret and misconceived. These kinds of views of freedom happen to be erroneous in nature. Some individuals think that liberty is the absence of laws, control and restrictions. I have privately heard a teenager shouting back again saying that they would like to be free from their particular parents’ rules and regulations. Some even feel that freedom can be without anarchy or live without regulations or rules. Many people and especially young people think that flexibility is about living irresponsibility, without being responsible or being liable to any human body.

For some persons freedom is about the elimination of work and obligation. This equates to apathy and staying slack. Although from my understanding, independence demands most of our time and work than once in bondage. When your are bound, you are well looked after by your captors for instance if you are in jail, it is the responsibility of the prison authorities to look after you. Even more I have read some people saying freedom is retiring via responsibility. But is not true since one cannot separate freedom from responsibility these are two sides of the same coins. Certainly, some lengthen, say that independence is about rest from sociable boundaries and rules, but this is misunderstanding. One has to relax since they are free. Essentially, some even believe freedom has been released via external control. They argue that it is regarding being still left alone to perform what they want or perhaps like without control from the father and mother, employers or use the government.

Bottom line

This newspaper has attemptedto answer the question whether that most important to value their own existence, happiness and interest in order to obey the higher authority in the state. It really is question which will address problem of person freedom and rights. Person freedom and rights are two concepts that are connected together. One particular cannot do without the different. The concept of liberty is often associated with being released through the external handles whereby one thinks they are not held accountable or responsible towards the others. Those two views had been very good for many years because scholars cope with them. You start with the Ancient greek language philosophers just like Socrates and Confucius, specific freedom and rights had been discussed in more details. These philosophers trained that although we are cost-free agents were are still exposed to human control and governance. This means that we could still appreciated to follow the principles and polices of the express.

However , the void of obeying the state and its decrees is what induced much friction between the cathedral and the condition. For many years, the first 100 years were persecuted by the Both roman governments for now disobeying the emperor’s instructions on cultic worship. This factor was taken table by theologians for many years latter as to whether the church can be free from the powers with the state. This is also implied as to whether indeed Christians are free by following the rules ordered by state.

Throughout the enlightenment period various thoughts began to come up concerning the issue of specific freedom and right from contemporary Europe philosophers. These talk produced additional debates upon liberalism, democracy and individual rights. Following a end of modernity the postmodern paradigm began to arise to give several views to the people ones held by modernity thinkers. The post modern day mind view argues there is one fulfilled narratives, that people all include our testimonies of what is right and wrong, we have to follow precisely what is appropriate for all of us. I would certainly not subscribe to any of these views although a mixture of both equally. I would like to dispute that individual liberty is there, although we have to end up being accountable about what we carry out to others. Our concept of independence, rights and happiness should be inline while using laws of our societies.

1

Tweet