Policy from the department of job and essay

Promote Care, Wellbeing, Infant Declaration, Child Declaration

Excerpt via Essay:

Policy through the Department of Job and Family Services

A recent coverage was integrated by Anytown’s Department of Job and Family Solutions regarding the concern of child endangerment, that the children of a home in which there are certain offenses will probably be removed until the parents or caretakers can present themselves to have been rehabilitated. To explain this decision, the Department of Job and Family Solutions referred to the social learning theory. This kind of policy newspaper will addresses the ethical and moral issues involved with implementing this new policy, consider the impact of implementing this sort of a policy, and conclude by simply discussing whether the Department of Job and Family Providers correctly construed and used this theory in planning and putting into action this policy.

There are several moral and meaning issues that can arise coming from implementing this new policy. Initial, has the theory been utilized correctly? Cultural learning theory does, in fact , imply that kids could find out violent tendencies from their father and mother (Ormond, 1999). However , it implies far more than that. Social learning theory declares that people learn from noticing the people surrounding them. It implies that children will be taught behavior from whoever their caretakers happen to be, the people that they observe the most. On a functional level, though, who does this replace the parents with? The usa foster care system, whilst it may be the greatest the state has to offer, is notoriously problematic. May be the state a classic better caretaker than a violent parent? Together with the history of engender care in the usa, foster care may not be the most helpful to the kid. In 2009, there are 423, 773 children in foster treatment in the United States (Lawrence, Carlson, Egeland, 2006). Adults who were in foster proper care as children experience higher rates of physical and psychiatric morbidity than the standard population. Most of these facts, along with recent research, suggest that foster care positionings are more detrimental to children than remaining in a troubled home.

The impact with this law really should not be underestimated. The end result could be confident. It could take those child away of a house in which they were abused, or perhaps witnessed misuse, or other crimes. This might reduce the quantity of offense in the future, as children could either not really learn that behavior, or learn that that behavior was penalized. It could also remove kids from homes in which the father and mother were confused and have other items to concentrate on just before they take good care of their kids. It could also get high risk children and households involved in the program at an early age, from which further disruptions and difficulty could be averted.

This plan could have critical negative influences on the welfare of the child, as well as the culture in general. This kind of law could break up various families. Especially, the policy is overreaching in its knowledge. It would punish many groups of non-violent offenders, like persons being punished for one instance of

Tweet