Kahlo v. Rembrandt before referencing
Rembrandt and Kahlo – a comparison and contrasting study of two self-portraits
Both Rembrandt van Rijn and Frida Kahlo had been artists who also redefined the subject matter and elegance of painting for their respective generations. Although profoundly different in their sensibilities, historical situations, and individuality, both of these artists tackled the difficult task of fashioning an image of themselves upon fabric. Rembrandt, in fact , was specifically famous for portrait and painting his photo, at distinct junctures of his life (Martin Jacobus 93). Rembrandt’s 1659 oil canvas eligible simply “Self-Portrait” is feature of the unadorned, spare style of portraiture that defined this Dutch artist’s realistic design. In contrast, the Mexican specialist Frida Kahlo’s oil-on-masonite “Self-Portrait with Thorn Necklace and Hummingbird” of 1940 is known as a surrealist airline flight of expensive that should create a clairvoyant, rather than a textual self-portrait.
Rembrandt’s desire to target the gazer’s eye only on the artist’s physical self is manifest in the fact that his “Self-Portrait” only consists of a foreground and background. We have a deliberate lack of complexity in the dark background, which usually directs the viewer’s focus solely to the artist’s image. In contrast, Kahlo’s foreground of her encounter and the exotic animals and plants is set against a wild array of leaves and greenery. The lighter leaf against Kahlo’s image locomotives the audience’s eye towards the middle earth of the piece of art, while the pointed leaves business lead the viewer’s eye towards the background, which will deemphasizes Kahlo’s image and in turn causes the viewer to focus her natural environment.
Despite the lack of middle ground in the 1659 “Self-Portrait” Rembrandt’s painting should give a more strikingly practical view from the artist’s personal image. Rembrandt was deemed revolutionary in his day due to his deficiency of idealism. He paints his bulbous nasal area, his wrinkles, without deteriorating into grotesqueness, or trying to cover up his flows. Rather, he is interested in his defects but will not revel in these people. He reveals them so that they are besides making them in to an object of objective artistic study and scrutiny. Kahlo’s surrealism efforts a portraiture of the artist’s inner, wish life instead of an external realism, and the monkey as well as the cat that evidently preoccupy Kahlo’s brain are displayed, and given as much emphasis as the development of Kahlo’s face.
Although Rembrandt’s style is not really surrealistic just like Kahlo, his painting still contains several symbolism, but far more muted symbolism. As opposed to Kahlo’s dog iconography, his symbolism is definitely far easier to interpret because of its straightforward character. For example , Rembrandt includes a featured hand in his portrait, addressing his life as an artist. In Kahlo, it takes closer assessment to understand the way the dragonflies and butterflies of the painting resemble freedom and a aspire to transcend the physical discomfort Kahlo suffered in life (Martin