Response to Hurricanes for Hostipal wards Essay

Research from Composition:

ALL OF US Disaster Preparation and Insufficient with Regards to the Hurricanes and US Administration

Introduction

The health policy relating to U. S. disaster preparation or perhaps lack thereof with respect to hurricanes is definitely one that need to include a better system of interaction between the U. S. devastation response groups and the hospitals in the afflicted regions. Since Hurricane Katrina showed, the U. H. was not able to handle the level of response needed in the wake of the tragedy the storm produced. The difficulties with the respond to Hurricane Katrina were quite a few: there was simply no National Response Plan (NPR) in place and there was no National Occurrence Management System (NIMS) in existence. Additionally , the Government Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was almost ineffective: it was in decrease for years, was suffering from significant turnover amongst top commanders, and the people who were in charge lacked the correct leadership experience and expertise to supervise an effective response to a natural catastrophe like Typhoon Katrina (Lewis, 2009; Select Bipartisan Panel to Investigate the Preparation intended for and Response to Hurricane Katrina, 2006). A large number of lessons had been learned seeing that Katrina which may have enabled the U. S. to be better prepared to manage hurricanes and be sure that medical care facilities will be ready to treat these in require. This policy brief will certainly describe the health policy issue, its impact on access/cost/quality, the particular policy would do to assure better gain access to, what some of the potential unintended outcomes of the policy may be, and what stakeholders will likely support and oppose and why.

The Policy

The policy beneath discussion is the problem of preparedness and a lack of dexterity between the response agencies and local area clinics. To provide take care of people during an emergency situation in a time just like a hurricane, right precautions need to be followed and a process has to be developed that all stakeholders can appreciate and follow. What this kind of policy calls for is interagency collaboration to make sure that the powerful quality treatment is being shipped to those in need during a hurricane disaster. This is a crucial policy since, as Katrina showed, only agencies which have been motivated by a cohesive heart will perform well. First, FEMA had badly trained personnel and Fresh Orleans Episode Command Program (ICS) has not been ready or prepared to reply to a disaster like Katrina, which was the fault of leadership below both Representative Michael Dark brown, who resigned shortly after Katrina, and New Orleans county. Second, FEMA had been struggling to provide enough shelter for those affected by the hurricane and the following flooding, and this was obviously a result of leaderships failure to arrange. Third, leadership failed to present adequate logistics in managing the response and had to rely on the leadership in the U. T. Coast Protect to accomplish whatever of material in the consequences of Katrina (Samaan Verneuil, 2009). The U. H. Coast Safeguard excelled and surpassed targets in the

[ parts of this kind of paper will be missing, just click here to view or perhaps download the complete document ]

will make clear their role in hurricane response and preparedness though there will also be significant hurdles to overcome with regards to planning and coordinating with relevant companies. At the same time they can be likely to benefit from the additional funding secured that they are provided to formulate these strategies. The government and express and local response agencies are usually likely support this plan as it means their efficiency will be better and a much more rapid response effort may be developed ahead of time with pre-planned steps for communicating quickly put into place. The population is likely to support this plan because it implies that they will obtain better treatment, improved use of care, and that the same complications seen during Katrina and other hurricanes will never be revisited. Expense of care will be covered by the us government under urgent declarations funding and so the general public will not have to consider their own medical care bills at the time.

Conclusion: How to Vote

Voting to support this kind of policy should be the top priority over everyone in Congress mainly because it will be a positive step in linking the gap between current health care facilities and the organization response groups tasked with developing ideal plans intended for hurricane unfortunate occurances. By supporting this coverage and voting for it Our elected representatives will be able to present constituents they may have put their utmost interests in mind. A policy like this would generate more cohesion and better

Research from Dissertation:

US Disaster Preparation and Not enough with Regards to the Hurricanes and US Administration

Intro

The health plan relating to U. S. disaster preparation or lack thereof regarding hurricanes is one that must include a better system of conversation between the U. S. disaster response clubs and the hospitals in the affected regions. While Hurricane Katrina showed, the U. S i9000. was not willing to handle the degree of response necessary in the wake of the failure the storm produced. The issues with the respond to Hurricane Katrina were several: there was not any National Response Plan (NPR) in place and there was not any National Occurrence Management System (NIMS) in existence. In addition , the Federal government Emergency Supervision Agency (FEMA) was practically ineffective: it was in drop for years, was suffering from significant turnover among top market leaders, and the people who were in charge lacked the correct leadership encounter and know-how to supervise an effective response to a natural devastation like Typhoon Katrina (Lewis, 2009; Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation intended for and Response to Hurricane Katrina, 2006). Various lessons have already been learned as Katrina which may have enabled the U. T. to be better prepared to handle hurricanes and be sure that medical facilities are ready to treat those in want. This policy brief will describe the policy issue, its impact on access/cost/quality, what the policy would do to assure better gain access to, what some of the potential unintended outcomes in the policy could possibly be, and what stakeholders will likely support and oppose and why.

The Policy

The policy underneath discussion may be the problem of preparedness and a lack of dexterity between the response agencies and local area clinics. To provide look after people during an emergency situation in a time just like a hurricane, appropriate precautions need to be followed and a protocol has to be developed that all stakeholders can enjoy and follow. What this kind of policy requires is interagency collaboration to make certain the successful quality treatment is being shipped to those in need throughout a hurricane catastrophe. This is an important policy mainly because, as Katrina showed, only agencies that are motivated with a cohesive spirit will work. First, FEMA had improperly trained staff and Fresh Orleans Episode Command System (ICS) has not been ready or perhaps prepared to react to a disaster just like Katrina, which was the because of leadership beneath both Representative Michael Darkish, who retired shortly after Katrina, and Fresh Orleans local government. Second, FEMA had been unable to provide satisfactory shelter for all those affected by the hurricane and the following water damage, and this was obviously a result of leaderships failure to organize. Third, leadership failed to provide adequate strategies in controlling the response and had to rely on the leadership of the U. H. Coast Safeguard to accomplish anything at all of material in the consequences of Katrina (Samaan Verneuil, 2009). The U. S i9000. Coast Shield excelled and surpassed targets in the

[ parts of this kind of paper are missing, just click here to view or perhaps download the whole document ]

will clarify their role in hurricane response and preparedness though people also be significant hurdles to overcome regarding planning and coordinating with relevant firms. At the same time they can be likely to enjoy the additional funding secured that they are provided to produce these plans. The government and point out and local response agencies can also be likely support this insurance plan as it means their effectiveness will be increased and an infinitely more rapid response effort may be developed ahead of time with pre-planned steps pertaining to communicating quickly put into place. The general public is likely to support this insurance plan because it implies that they will receive better attention, improved use of care, and the same concerns seen during Katrina and also other hurricanes are not revisited. Cost of care will probably be covered by the federal government under urgent declarations funding and so the general public will not have to consider their own health care bills at the moment.

Conclusion: How you can Vote

Voting to support this kind of policy ought to be the top priority above everyone in Congress since it will be a confident step in linking the gap between current health care establishments and the organization response clubs tasked with developing suitable plans pertaining to hurricane catastrophes. By assisting this coverage and voting for it Our elected representatives will be able to show constituents they may have put their finest interests as the primary goal. A policy like this would create more combination and better

Tweet