Sociology drug addiction theory term paper

Addiction, Cigarette smoking, Sociology, Égo?ste Personality Disorder

Excerpt via Term Newspaper:

Relating to NIDA (2007), cigarette use resulted in the fatality of approximately 75 million persons in the 20th century, with a projected total approaching 1 billion by the end of this hundred years at the current rate of usage.

On the other hand, NIDA even now currently views “drug” addiction as a disease, despite its contradictory inability to assign, the same portrayal to nicotine addiction.

In justifying where it stands that habit is a “disease of the human brain, ” NIDA (2007) relies primarily in neurological data provided by advanced methods of brainwave studies and brain imaging technologies, which usually identify characteristic differences between neurological replies to the ingestion of drugs and alcohol by individuals vulnerable to addiction plus the responses of individuals less prone to addiction to a similar agents.

These studies show that the minds of lovers respond extremely differently via those of nonaddicts, in depth, as well as in terms of local involvement (NIDA, 2007).

However , as Reinarman (2005) while others explain, several differences stand for learned patterns of autonomic responses rather than inherent physiological differences feature of different medical diseases. Similarly, the same brainwaves and other neurological indications of drug addiction will be equally apparent in the minds of individuals hooked on food, physical exercise, sex, wagering, caffeine, cigarettes, and even searching. Therefore , in principle, precisely the same criteria should certainly justify classifying as a disease virtually any human being behavioral activity that causes these kinds of neurological responses.

Conclusion:

Ingesting substances seen to produce momentary sensory pleasure, or these known for their value in feelings enhancement can be described as feature of human societies throughout the world, many certainly predates recorded background (Brecher, 1972). Whether a particular practice is regarded as an accepted and normal activity or deviant antisocial actions are largely a function of culture and cultural norms. Regardless of their cultural connotations, an extremely wide range of individual behaviors are capable of resulting in habit forming behaviors. Often times, it is the societal perspective linked to the ingestion of a particular element, more than anything else, that defines obsession with it as being a disease, since similar habit with respect to substances (or behaviors) unattached to social stigma is not similarly specified.

Admittedly, innate predisposition and external environmental factors play a role in make some individuals more susceptible to craving than other folks. Nevertheless, understanding addiction as being a disease nonetheless, necessarily, consists of amorphous criteria and very subjective determination, accurately because its symptoms vary so much among and among different people, as well as mainly because addiction to drugs mirrors obsession with benign manners so strongly.

Ultimately, what is important more than a definitive classification of drug addiction as genuine medical disease is that the symptoms be addressed within a manner conducive to their alleviation and to closing the habit. Toward that end, the best strategy is always to address the factors implicated in addiction before that they manifest themselves in craving, regardless of it is precise naming.

References

Brecher, E. (1972) Licit and Illicit Medications. Little Darkish Co.: Boston

LeGrand. L., lacono, T., McGue, M. Predicting Craving, ” American Scientist (March-April 2005)

Reinarman, C. Dependency as Achievement: The Bright Construction of Disease. Dependency Research and Theory; Aug 05-13(4): 307-320

Sullum, J. “The Unexpected Truth about Heroin and Addiction, ” Reason (June 2003)

U. S. G. H. They would. S. Medications, Brains, and Behavior: Technology

Tweet