Terrorist attacks of sept 11 2001 whether term

Detrimental Disobedience, Guantanamo Bay, Patriot Act, Ethnicity Profiling

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Terrorist problems of Sept. 2010 11, 2001 [… ] whether the federal government needs to perform all it could in order to protect its people, even if that means they have to surrender some of their municipal liberties. The terrorist problems of Sept 11, 2001 changed America forever. The folks understood we were holding vulnerable the first time in decades, and they understood that reliability measures will have to increase – that was clearly comprehended. However , People in the usa have surrendered many of their very own civil protections since the terrorist attacks, and that is simply not suitable in our society. I was not happy to surrender some of the most important municipal liberties for greater secureness, because I believe that many from the civil protections we surrendered were not necessary, and the Patriot Act provided the government much more power than necessary.

In the aftermath of September 14, people were terrified. They wondered how it absolutely was possible for the highjackers to get on plank the airplanes with weaponry, and how they will could living and working freely in the us while planning the disorders. It produced sense that security measures would have to boost; we had to make sure this may not happen again. Greater secureness measures for airports had been clearly as a way. They have converted air travel into a nightmare, nonetheless they do provide a greater degree of security relatively. (This is usually not regarding the many faults in the program that have allowed a variety of prohibited items on flights during tests, that is certainly another issue. )

However , Congress, the President, as well as the Attorney Basic enacted a number of other actions that have taken away some of each of our most important municipal liberties. An author notes, “A month after Bush’s declaration of conflict, Attorney General John Ashcroft led a practically unquestioning Congress to sanction laws that will change the idea of what it means to be ‘free’ in the us that old back over 200 years” (Cassel 2). The situation with these kinds of laws, particularly the Patriot Work of 2001, is that they are so broad, they may be used practically with impunity by firms like the F and Homeland Security, and thus no one is really safe from federal government scrutiny, regardless of how innocent they may be. Author Cassel continues, “This definition is really broad that practically any act of civil disobedience could be construed to be ‘terrorism. ‘ (A political demonstration taking place in the path of your ambulance, for example , could be called ‘dangerous to human life)” (Cassel 2). I believe you will find at least some people in government who also are not previously mentioned using this extensive definition for private or self-serving reasons, and that is one purpose I believe our civil protections have been broken in hazardous and adverse ways. Sadly, most People in america simply folded over and disregarded this invasion on their municipal liberties, assuming it was “unpatriotic” to protest this significant loss of city rights.

The Patriot Take action and other legal guidelines took away the civil protections of all individuals, but they targeted Arabs and Muslims, as well. Author Cassel notes, “There are hundreds, even countless numbers, of horror stories of innocent people that were inhibited

Tweet