William Shakespeare includes a Duke to represent the most authority estimate many of his plays. In The Comedy of Errors as well as the Merchant of Venice, the two Dukes carry complete control—or, at least, what they perceive to be finish control—over their very own respective regions. Shakespeare uses these two characters to show just how “authority” is usually oftentimes an illusion, which, ultimately, everybody, including the Dukes, are impotent to the legislation. While the Dukes enforce and ostensibly make the law, they may be still controlled by its strict rules. Shakespeare presents the legal system as static and critical to contemporary society: a Duke neglecting to enforce what the law states would “Much impeach the justice of his state, ” leading to pandemonium to ensue (Merchant III, several, 29). Although the Dukes often do not accept it—for meaning, social, and legal reasons—they “cannot reject the span of law” (Merchant III, three or more, 26). To this end, Shakespeare shows his audience that even the top authority figures are not above the law.
Solinus, the Fight it out of Ephesus, spends the vast majority of Comedy of Errors hesitant to carry out what the law states. After Egeon recounts his life account, Solinus swells with shame, declaring:
Now trust me, had been it not against our laws—
Which princes, might they, might not disannul—
Against my personal crown, my personal oath, my personal dignity,
My soul should sue since advocate for thee (Comedy I, one particular, 142-145).
Even though Solinus desperately really wants to pardon Egeon, he are not able to risk breaking the law and placing a precedent for foreseeable future Syracusians who also travel to Ephesus. From a moral viewpoint, Solinus knows that freeing Egeon is the just action, which is why punishing the man is such a hardship on the Duke. Solinus displays his strong set of ethics if he permits Egeon to live right up until sundown, allowing for the possibility of somebody paying his ransom at the last minute. Going further, once Solinus is usually walking Egeon to the performance site, this individual calls to be able to his people, “Yet once again proclaim it publicly, /If any good friend will pay the sum pertaining to him, /He shall not die, so much all of us tender him” (Comedy Sixth is v, 1, 131-133). Shakespeare causes it to be clear that Solinus does not want to go through with the execution—so clear, in fact , that it is probably his determining characteristic—illustrating the concept even if a Duke abhors a legislation on a meaningful level, this individual still must enforce that.
The Fight it out of Venice also grapples with the concept of morality once enforcing his laws. Rather than internally fighting meting out your law, however , the Duke of Venice projects his ethical standards onto others. After Shylock demands a pound of Antonio’s drag, the Fight it out says, “How shalt thou hope for mercy, rendering none? ” (Merchant IV, you, 88). Subsequently, Shylock highlights the hypocrisy of the Duke, saying “You have amongst you various a purchased slave, /Which—like your butts and your puppies and mules—/You use in shoddy and in slavish parts/Because you bought them” (Merchant IV, 1, 90-93). Shylock’s critique stretches beyond this one incident: the Duke enforces the law with no complaint because it favors him, but when one of his friends is danger, this individual starts rhapsodizing about values. This suggests that the Fight it out is not really concerned with values than protecting the people he associates with. The 1st half of work IV, landscape one—where it appears inevitable that Shylock is going to kill Antonio—demonstrates the Duke’s powerlessness when confronted with the law. Just the fact that the Duke, a noted anti-Semite, asks Shylock for mercy shows how desperate he is to help Antonio.
Social status also bleeds into both Dukes’ enforcement of the regulation. In Work V, landscape 1 of Comedy, Solinus will not possibly entertain Adriana’s claim that the Abbess determined a crime. Solinus relies on his preconceived notions of Abbesses—that they are women of religion, and therefore entirely incapable of wrongdoing—to judge Adriana’s declaration. He reports, “She is actually a virtuous and reverend female. /It can not be that the girl hath performed thee wrong” (Comedy Sixth is v, 1, 135-136). Immediately thereafter, Solinus reveals his predilection for Antipholus of Ephesus, saying to Adriana:
Very long since they husband served me personally in my wars,
And I to thee employed a prince’s word,
When though didst make him master of thy foundation,
To do him all the sophistication and good I could. (Comedy V, 1, 162-165)
Solinus does eventually pardon Egeon, but not until it finally is revealed that Egeon is Antipholus of Ephesus’s dad. More importantly, Antiphons of Ephesus offers to pay Egon’s ransom. Without even Solinus’s kindness—which, again, evidences his affinity for Antiphons of Ephesus and his interpersonal biases—Egeon would have been collection free together with his son’s cash. In this regard, Solinus is certainly not breaking the law, he can merely helping out a friend.
The Duke of Venice uses similar logic when meting out Shylock’s punishment pertaining to attempting to murder Antonio. Even though the state of Venice can be entitled to half of Shylock’s estate, the Duke shows mercy and willingly reduces the penalty to a smaller good. This favor is arguably even more beneficial to Antonio, though, than it is to Shylock. The Fight it out essentially allows Antonio to decide on Shylock’s treatment. After Antonio insists that Shylock “presently become a a Christian” and “record a gift/Here unto his kid Lorenzo and his daughter, inch the Duke immediately agrees, saying, “He shall accomplish this, or else I actually do recant/The pardon that I later pronounc? g here” (Merchant IV, 1, 382-385, Product owner IV, one particular, 386-387). This shows how a Duke—so very long as he is at accordance while using law—will demonstrate preferential treatment to his friends. This further emphasizes his powerlessness with, and not enough knowledge of, legislation.
Going additional, Shakespeare shows that the two Dukes are quite poor by carrying out their duties. Although Solinus claims that he’s “not partial to infringe our laws, inch he enables Egeon to have for the rest of the day (Comedy I, one particular, 3-4). This kind of circumnavigation from the law can be exacerbated by the fact that Egeon does not subject to his death sentence. Indeed, this individual seems encouraged by the inevitability of loss of life, saying, “Proceed, Solinus, to acquire my fall, /And by doom of death end woes and all” (Comedy I, you, 1-2). Solinus reveals his distaste for the law quickly, and his motivation for slowing down the delivery is entirely internal. This individual lets subjective opinion secret in what ought to otherwise be an objective decision.
The Duke of Venice is more than just poor at carrying out his duties—he is flat out inept. The Fight it out only provides a vague comprehension of the law, even though he enforces it. Following trying—and failing—to appeal to Shylock’s humanity, the Fight it out acquiesces and reluctantly admits defeat, all set to say goodbye to Antonio. Portia’s shrewdness is the simply reason that Antonio is spared by Shylock’s cutlery. She deals with to uphold the contract while continue to 1, protecting Antonio’s life—a feat that the Duke could not accomplish—saying, “Prepare thee to cut off the drag. /She thou no blood vessels, nor minimize thou less nor more/But just a pound of flesh” (Merchant IV, 1, 322-324). She also has a familiarity with arcane Venetian regulations. This further reephasizes the idea that the Duke’s expert is an illusion. The most powerful person in The Vendor of Venice is not really the Fight it out, but Portia, because she actually is the only character who thinks like a attorney. To this end, Shakespeare is suggesting that knowledge begets power. Your most humble character in the play—an heiress, for example—can command one of the most authority within the room.
Solinus and the Duke of Venice will be ostensibly the two most powerful characters in their individual plays, but , in actuality, they are at the mercy of what the law states, just like everyone else. They do not rule over their particular domains, what the law states does. Shakespeare depicts those two Dukes as useless, empty authority figures, showing that power is rooted in more than just status.