The miller s tale and the reeve s tale article

The fabliaux, “The Reeve’s Tale” and “The Miller’s Tale” of Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Reports, express comparable characteristics however simultaneously communicate differences. “The Reeve’s Tale” is far more obstructive ? uncooperative than “The Miller’s Tale”, which is portrayed as a story of slapstick humor and ignorance. Equally “The Reeve’s Tale” and “The Miller’s Tale” overlap on the theme of lies. Both of these reports express the theme of payback. “The Reeve’s Tale” focuses on the concept of the sin more than “The Miller’s Tale” truly does.

Both “The Reeve’s Tale” and “The Miller’s Tale” possess the common topic of lust. Both these fabliaux reveal their narrator’s motive pertaining to reciting these kinds of tales. Even so, the clear victor between conflict from the reeve and the Miller would obviously always be the Reeve.

“The Reeve’s Tale” largely deals with sex, burglary, and cruelty which in turn allow someone to describe it as a “black” comedy. “The Reeve’s Tale” dealt with a sinister Callier named Simpkin, who took wheat and corn.

The narrator explains, “He was a thief as well of corn and meal, and sly in which; his behavior was to steal” (109). Simpkin is a notorious brute who is married into a daughter of a parson. They have a 20 year older daughter named Molly and an infant. The Miller prepared to steal meal from the two students, Joe and Steve. Knowing in the Miller’s trick, they organized to take payback by fornicating with the Miller’s daughter and wife. The Miller’s Tale is different or in other words that the narrator speaks associated with an old father as being naive and unaware of his surroundings. The Miller marries a woman, whom ends up staying seduced by a young man called Nicholas. The narrator points out, “Now, men, this gallant Nicholas eventually began to romp and make a pass at this fresh woman, within a mood of play, her husband becoming out, straight down Osney method. Students are sly, and giving way to whim he made a grab a caught her by the quim” (91).

“The Miller’s Tale” is not as vulgar and sexually crude as “The Reeve’s Story. ” The 2 tales vary because the father tells a sinister tale of treason whereas the miller tells a tale more concentrated about slapstick humor. Despite specific differences between fabliaux, both tales discuss common characteristics. Both “The Reeve’s Tale” and “The Miller’s Tale” share the theme of deception. Simkin of “The Reeve’s Tale” attempts to trick his clients, including the two students, Alan and Ruben.

The narrator says, “On hearing which the miller robbed him more one hundred times than he had robbed before; intended for up until then he’d only swindled politely, nevertheless he took outrageously, forthrightly” (110). In “The Reeve’s Tale”, Joe and John exact their revenge around the Miller simply by deceiving him and causing the Burns physical soreness. In “The Miller’s Tale” Alison deceives Absolon. The narrator clarifies, “And on the window away she set her pit, and Absolon, so good fortune framed the farce, organized his oral cavity and kissed her nude arse…” (103). Alison led Absalon to think he was going to receive a hug, but your woman tricked him into the kiss her naked butt ,in shame,.

The theme of revenge can be evident during both of these reports. In “The Reeve’s Adventure, ” Alan and Steve take payback on the burns by sleeping with his little girl and partner. Alan exclaims to Steve, “But by no means ye mind, all shall be for the best; We tell en, John, because sure as I’m a man I’m going to have got that wrench there, merely can! The laws grants easement when things gan amiss…” (115). In “The Miller’s Tale” Alison seeks to take revenge on her hubby for being also jealous. Alison says to Nicholas, “My husband is really full of jealousy, unless you be careful about your step and hold your breath I realize for certain it can be my loss of life, she stated, ‘So retain it well below your hat'” (91). Always wishing for an opportunity to spite her partner, Alison provides into Nicholas’ desires.

The Miller in “The Reeve’s Tale” is an extremely sinful and wicked man. He is a dishonest robber whose partner is the daughter of a clergyman. Since clergymen are forbidden from marital life and sexual, she is as a result an illegitimate baby. The narrator says, “And her birth was smirched to put it lightly; being the daughter of a celibate priest…” (109). “The Reeve’s Tale” greatly entails the sins of violence, adultery, and thievery. Nevertheless , “The Miller’s Tale” concentrates more for the gullibility and ignorance of the carpenter. The carpenter of “The Miller’s Tale” can be an old guy, who is very easily deceived due to his gullibility. Nicholas reassures Alison, “A scholar does not have to blend his sensibilities so much to trick a carpenter” (91). The reeve in “The Miller’s Tale” can be described as simply a naïve old man rather than a sinner like the burns in “The Reeve’s Tale”.

The concept of the lust is noted during both reports. In “The Reeve’s Tale”, the two students, Alan and John, experienced sex while using Miller’s girl and wife. The narrator describes, “Alan rose up; towards the wench he crept. The wench lay toned upon her back and slept, and ere she noticed him, he previously drawn thus nigh it absolutely was too late on her behalf to weep. To put it briefly, these were soon by one” (115). The two lustful students served on their desire to have revenge for the Miller. In “The Miller’s Tale”, Nicholas’s love pertaining to Alison is lustful, although Absolon comes with an idealistic and romantic love for Alison. Nicholas recognizes Alison much more of a sexual and physical way, rather than in a romantic manner. Nicholas says to Alison, “Where are your manners? Eliminate your paws! ” In that case Nicholas started to plead his cause” (91). Even following Alison declined Nicholas’ attempts to jump her, this individual still persisted, manifesting his lust for Alison.

The drunk and belligerent Robin the boy wonder offers to follow up “The Knight’s Tale” with a tale of his own. The host eventually allows Robin to tell his tale, yet Oswald things this decision. Robin by speaking attacks Oswald with this kind of tale, and infuriates him. The Reeve shouts “Shut your trap! Giver using your drunken harlotry. It is a sin and foolishness, explained he, To slander virtually any man or bring scandal on wives or girlfriends in general.

For what reason can’t you handle a few other tale” (87)? In reply to this “slap in the face”, Oswald stands and gives an account of his own. This individual counterattacks and provide an even more vulgar and atrocious tale slandering Robin regardless. Oswald says, “I’ll pay him again before I’ve done in his own filthy words, you may expec. I hope to The almighty he destroys his weakling neck. He sees the mote within my eye, when there is un, although cannot view the beam there in his’n” (108). This kind of entire dispute is induced over spite.

The drunken Robin, in one’s view, was defeated by Oswald in this struggle of wits. They both equally used graceful violence to silence the other person, yet Oswald seemed to have the advantage of sobriety on his part. In the end, the dispute resolved nothing.

Bibliography

– The Canterbury Stories, by Geoffrey Chaucer

1

Tweet