Freud and Psychoanalytic Theory
The seminal theorist selected coming from Chapter 7 of the Morgan (2006) text is Sigmund Freud. Freud was among the early leaders of psychoanalytic theory, typically prevalent today and is associated with a psychodynamic perspective as well as its presence in contemporary companies. There is a exclusive way in which psychoanalytic theory – and many of the concepts advanced by Freud – may influence functional cultural identity. By extension, there are a number of different ways social identity may pertain into a leader’s effect on the understanding of social identity and organizational (and individual) functionality.
Perhaps the main notion of psychoanalytic theory is that someone’s past takes on a substantial role in his or her present. The specialist utilizing this kind of theory efforts to identify key elements in a person’s past which have been contributing to myriad manifestations in his or her present your life, and change these to both positively impact this current and long term behavior on this person. The goal is to then rebuild one’s persona out of its several components (such as the Id, Superego, and the Ego). This theory also features various portions of psychosexual developmental stages, which can be believed to be the cause of one’s individuality and numerous cognitive problems such as neurosis (Garcia, 95, p. 498).
This point of view can affect cultural personality in any plethora of possibilities. However , precisely what is most significant relating to this perspective is that it generally does not take into account various sociological and cultural factors – certainly not towards the extent that other ideas and advocates do. Actually the portions of psychoanalytic theory advanced by simply Freud will be predicated on the fact that most folks are the same in spite of culture and just consist of different aspects of persona. As such, the dominant aspect of cultural personality associated with this kind of perspective is actually a Westernized one with little accountability to get other nationalities. Thus, the principle influence of this perspective on useful cultural id is that it reinforces Westernization and, to a lesser magnitude, Western brilliance. Rather, it does not take into account various other aspects of lifestyle that hypotheses that are modern-day do. This merely increases the conviction that Western ethnical homogeneity reigns, and requires much more priority in explicating psychodynamic forces than other ethnicities, and other hypotheses that are even more inclusive of additional cultures, perform.
Within an organizational context, social identity is greatly linked to the efficiency of the two