Freud or rogers sigmund freud study paper

Sigmund Freud, Carl Rogers, Psychotherapy, Humanistic Psychology

Excerpt from Research Conventional paper:

Prevos (2005) additional states

“A person’s identification is formed through a series of personal experiences, which reflect how a individual is perceived simply by both him or their self and the outside the house world – the phenomeno-logical field. Persons also have encounters of which they can be unaware as well as the phenomenological discipline contains equally conscious and unconscious perceptions. The concept of the self can be, according to Rogers, yet , primarily conscious. The most important determinants of patterns are the your that are mindful or are able of becoming mindful. Roger states that a meaning of the personal that includes a reference to the subconscious (as with Freud) can not be studied objectively as it can not be immediately known. inch

This perfect description given by Prevos (2005) is just what Rogers may have envisioned of his theory. His is designed, unlike Freud, were to enable humanity to return, instead of alienating individuals simply by placing them in categories related solely to desire and sexuality. However , both specialists aimed to describe human motivation, and this can be seen as an similarity of two extremely opposite standpoint.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Both equally theories have got strengths and weaknesses. Various psychologists consider for example , the timing of the theories appropriate the growth with the psychological discipline, as well as the decades in which these people were constructed. It truly is, further, a logical prediction to mention that hypotheses will evolve, and that is exactly what happened when Rogers could not agree totally with Freud. However , although Rogers theory saw the great in people, there are still very good aspects of Freud’s theory, like the fact that “amidst all of Freud’s arrogance this individual actually wanted to listen to people. After finding the facts in his own personal introspections of his dreams and years as a child, he noticed that this is where the information wasBy hearing the sufferers he could gain regarding their unconscious and help all of them overcome their particular hysteria. inch

Conclusion

It really is, thus required for recognize not merely Freud and Rogers different takes on psychiatric therapy and character, but likewise the comparison between those two people, in addition to the strengths and weaknesses within each theory. These paragraphs have touched upon facets of each of these scopes; however , a more comprehensive research is surely necessary in order to addresses all completely.

Prevos, P. (2005). Hidden Personalities Relating to Freud and Rogers. Retrieved Sept 29,.

Freud Life and Work. 2011. Freud Data. Retrieved Sept 29,.

Prevos, P. (2005). Hidden People According to Freud and Rogers. Gathered September up to 29,.

Prevos, G. (2005). Invisible Personalities Relating to Freud and Rogers. Retrieved Sept. 2010 29,.

Carl Rogers. (2011). Simply Mindset. Retrieved September 30

Prevos, L. (2005). Concealed Personalities In respect to Freud and Rogers. Retrieved September 29,.

Prevos, P. (2005). Hidden Individuality According to Freud and Rogers. Retrieved September 29,.

Ansbacher, Corey, Phillips and Schultz. (2005). Freud’s Pros and cons. Retrieved September 30,.

Tweet