“Embryo cloning is the technology that will make the creation of eugenically engineered ‘designer babies’ in a commercial sense feasible. ” (Darnovsky M. 2002) This also pertains to the growing concern in some quarters that technologies just like stem cell manipulation can be subject to misuse. “Many impairment rights active supporters and workers argue that it can be being used in a misguided look for ‘perfect’ infants, and many feminists voice concern about its use to meet ‘gender preference’. ” (Darnovsky M. 2002)
There is therefore , from a religious point-of-view, solid objection to the new technology via many significant churches, specially the Catholic Cathedral. From a conservative religious perspective control cell study and the cloning of body parts are seen to become tantamount to saying that guy can create himself instead of God. This means that man and not God becomes the creator; which clearly undermines the foundations of countless of the world’s prominent theologies.
Therefore a large number of who happen to be opposed to the scientific worldview based only on purpose see the significance of cloning technology to be in immediate conflict with ethics and theology. Many of these critics are of the view that cloning will reduce the intrinsic well worth of what it means to be a man.
Experts just like Jeremy Rifkin, the author with the Biotech 100 years: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World, states that, “… were shocked and dismayed that clonal individual embryos had been patented and declared being human ‘inventions’. We oppose efforts to minimize human your life and its various parts and procedures to the status of simply research tools, manufactured goods, and utilities. ” (Rifkin 23)
The above mentioned view perhaps summarizes the central turmoil between the technological and the spiritual worldviews in many other areas of modern society as well. The critics of new systems such as control cell research, while they are aware of conceivable heath rewards, are concerned that the very take action of man reproduction will lose its innate worth and its particular essential romantic relationship to higher religious values. Within their view if stem cell research is transported to it is logical bottom line it will imply that the act of reproduction and individual creation can be a ‘production of a product’, which will exclude human nature and active creation and deny culture of the necessary impression of amazement and unknown at existence.
In conclusion, record has shown that there is often an initial negative a reaction to new methods. This may be the truth with stem cell research but the controversy about this technology goes further than just a argument about fresh science. Problems such as cloning and come cell exploration reveal the underlying turmoil and split between the faith based and scientific views of life. The scientific view is essentially focused on human creation and does not, in many cases, take into account moral and religious issues. Faith on the other hand is involved with discovering humanity in the context better values and ideals that go beyond realistic science. In this article you will find a number of researchers and theologians who are attempting to find prevalent ground between these two viewpoints.
Antiaging. 12 , 5, 06\. http://www.antiagings.co.uk/
Darnovsky M. Embryo Cloning and Beyond. 12 , 5, 2006. http://www.genetics-and-society.org/resources/cgs/200207_tikkun_darnovsky.html
Goldenberg S. Religious right battles science intended for the cardiovascular system of America. 2005.
December 6, 06\. http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1407422,00.html
McGillion C. Religion vs . research might be fantastic. 2003. 12
5, 06\. http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/04/28/1051381900365.html
Rifkin, Jeremy. “Why I Are at odds of Human Cloning. ” Tikkun July-Aug. 2002: 23+.
Come Cell basics. National Study centers of Well being. December a few, 2006. http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/basics1.asp