Critique of blue jean watson s theory essay

The Theory of Human Nurturing was written by Jean Watson. This model includes ten carative factors to support nurses with caring for all their patients. Doctor Watson cell phone calls this a transpersonal relationship. Watson describes transpersonal care ‘as the capacity of one human being to receive an additional human being’s expression of feelings also to experience these feelings to get oneself’ (Walker, 1996, l. 992). It is much more when compared to a scripted restorative response, it is just a moral obligation that soars from within the nurse, and Watson identifies nursing as both an art and a science.

The first premise with this theory is that the more person the feelings are, that the registered nurse transmits, a lot more strongly will the caring process affect the person (Walker, 1996). The two persons in a nurturing transaction are both in the process penalized and becoming.

The moment of coming together within an actual nurturing occasion reveals the opportunity for every person to understand from the other, how to always be human.

Watson indicates more than a pure mergence of experiences; the girl suggests a spiritual union of souls (Watson, 2008; Walker, mil novecentos e noventa e seis, p. 92). This writing will evaluate Watson’s theory and critique using Chinn and Kramer’s model of evaluation using information, clarity, convenience, generalizability, availability, and importance (Meleis, 2012, p. 184). Clarity Watson precisely describes the principles and subwoofer concepts central to this theory. Watson points out abstract phenomena by using common language in extraordinary methods, and uses non-technical, advanced, fluid, and evolutionary terminology to artfully describe principles.

Watson’s tendency toward metaphorical expression provides urgency with her moral message for medical (Alligood & Tomey, 2010). At times, lengthy phrases and sentences must be read more than once to share meaning. The increasing inclusion of metaphors, personal reflections, artwork, and poetry produce her intricate concepts even more tangible and more aesthetically interesting (Walker, 1996). According to Watson, ‘A model of patient science which goes beyond a great intellectualization in the topic attracts us right into a timeless yet timely space to revisit this perennial phenomenon from the human condition (Watson, 2008, p. 8).

Critics of Watson’s operate have concentrated on the usage of undefined or changing/shifting meanings and conditions and her focus on the psychosocial as opposed to the pathophysiological aspects of nursing (Alligood & Tomey, 2010, l. 101). Watson tends to describe abstract phenomena by using regular language in extraordinary methods. Watson’s propensity toward metaphorical expression adds urgency to her moral communication for nursing (Walker, 1996). Simplicity Watson draws on several disciplines to formulate her theory.

To understand the theory as it is presented, someone does finest by being familiar with the extensive subject matter. The idea is more regarding being than about doing, and it must be internalized thoroughly by the nurse whether it is to be actualized in practice. Overall health as unified unity of mind-body-soul recapitulates emphasis on human idealism inspires nurses to readopt or realign themselves with a dedication to care (Walker, 1996). Basic ideas and areas appeal to nurses aiming to ‘carve out’ a patient practice in the context of contemporary health care. Generalizability

Watson’s theory seeks to get a moral and philosophical basis for nursing. The range of the platform encompasses most aspects of the illness phenomenon. In addition the theory addresses areas of preventing disease and going through a calm death, therefore increasing the generality (Alligood & Tomey, 2010). The carative factors that Watson described give important suggestions for registered nurse patient interaction; however , some critics include stated that their generality is limited by emphasis added to psychosocial instead of physiological areas of care (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).

Transpersonal relationships may put the affected person at ease, trust increases, which is a great environment for healing to happen. Watson points out that concepts, defined as foundations of theory, bring new meaning towards the paradigm of nursing and were created from clinically inducted, empirical encounters, combined with philosophical, intellectual and experiential background; thus her early function emerged coming from her individual values, philosophy, and awareness about personhood, life, well being, and treatment (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).

Accessibility An additional characteristic with the theory is that it does not provide explicit guidelines about what to accomplish to achieve real caring healing relationship. Healthcare professionals who want concrete guidelines may not feel protected when trying to rely on the idea alone. Several suggest it would take very long to incorporate the caritas into practice, and more state that the emphasis on Watson’s personal growth gives her latest publication an idiosyncratic quality that although appealing to a few may not appeal to others (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).

This theory will not lend alone easily to research conducted through traditional medical methods (Walker, 1996). A few critics have stated that generality is limited by the emphasis placed on psychosocial rather than physiological aspects of nurturing (Alligood & Tomey, 2010). Watson continually state how a transpersonal marriage is the first step toward her theory, she calls this a particular kind of individual care relationship, a union with one other person-high consider for the whole person and their getting in the world (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).

1

Tweet